- #1
Thread Owner
So, if I am right and the gold is here as I believe, and if the family knew it was there, why did it stay there for 500 years? Actually,that is a good question. I bet you think I have an answer, and you are correct. Whether the answer is correct is another matter. 
The descendants of Moctezuma II did not quickly sink into poverty. II had offspring all over central Mexico, and often they were very important people in their regions.
Some of his descendants went to Spain to live, and were granted by the Spanish government, status and incomes of nobility ending only in the Twentieth Century. They still maintain privately their correct titles, and have sued for their monies to be restarted.
I don't have a lot of information on the other descendants around Central Mexico though I would like to, just in case those other regions have similar oral traditions.
In my region as late as the 18th Century, the head of the Moctezuma family still owned between 10 and 15 square miles of land, sharply down from the 17th Century. There would have been a major defense force around the home just as we see for very rich people today. Caciques were not expected to personally fight every man who had a quarrel with them, any more than governors in the USA are expected to personally deal with anyone who attacks them.
They were wealthy with all the land and resident workers. They did not need large quantities of gold for anything. Assuming they knew it was there...
By the mid-20th Century, land was sharply reduced. However, the descendant was still an important man, serving at least three times as president of the municipio. By this time, the area would have been fairly civilized, with few indigenous on the warpath. So, even the normal family members and ranch employees would produce considerable safety with the police as a back-up.
That man several times told his offspring if he didn't put something in the ground, he wasn't going to take it out. I believe they were raised up in the way he wanted them to go. Even if he knew it was there he had personal moral reasons to think it should stay there.
But, also in the 20th Century, when it became technically possible for someone to dig up the gold, the Federal government became more powerful, and decreed that all antiquities were the property of the Federal Government. Based on news items I have seen in recent years, obtaining and selling ancient gold items will get you tossed in the slammer. And, I do not mean for 24 hours until your attorney gets bail, either.
Perhaps the family did not know the gold was there. Anything is possible over that many years. And, they also viewed it as pure pulque talk. Until they found the skeleton and the gold piece around 100 years ago at which time the old man figured out, "Hey, the legends are true!" If I can figure it out, so could he. He was a smart man, though I have the advantage of the old books which he didn't.
Anyway, there are very valid reasons no one took the gold out over that 500 years. And, today the reasons are even graver to leave it there. You will not see that treasure in your lifetime.

The descendants of Moctezuma II did not quickly sink into poverty. II had offspring all over central Mexico, and often they were very important people in their regions.
Some of his descendants went to Spain to live, and were granted by the Spanish government, status and incomes of nobility ending only in the Twentieth Century. They still maintain privately their correct titles, and have sued for their monies to be restarted.
I don't have a lot of information on the other descendants around Central Mexico though I would like to, just in case those other regions have similar oral traditions.
In my region as late as the 18th Century, the head of the Moctezuma family still owned between 10 and 15 square miles of land, sharply down from the 17th Century. There would have been a major defense force around the home just as we see for very rich people today. Caciques were not expected to personally fight every man who had a quarrel with them, any more than governors in the USA are expected to personally deal with anyone who attacks them.
They were wealthy with all the land and resident workers. They did not need large quantities of gold for anything. Assuming they knew it was there...
By the mid-20th Century, land was sharply reduced. However, the descendant was still an important man, serving at least three times as president of the municipio. By this time, the area would have been fairly civilized, with few indigenous on the warpath. So, even the normal family members and ranch employees would produce considerable safety with the police as a back-up.
That man several times told his offspring if he didn't put something in the ground, he wasn't going to take it out. I believe they were raised up in the way he wanted them to go. Even if he knew it was there he had personal moral reasons to think it should stay there.
But, also in the 20th Century, when it became technically possible for someone to dig up the gold, the Federal government became more powerful, and decreed that all antiquities were the property of the Federal Government. Based on news items I have seen in recent years, obtaining and selling ancient gold items will get you tossed in the slammer. And, I do not mean for 24 hours until your attorney gets bail, either.
Perhaps the family did not know the gold was there. Anything is possible over that many years. And, they also viewed it as pure pulque talk. Until they found the skeleton and the gold piece around 100 years ago at which time the old man figured out, "Hey, the legends are true!" If I can figure it out, so could he. He was a smart man, though I have the advantage of the old books which he didn't.
Anyway, there are very valid reasons no one took the gold out over that 500 years. And, today the reasons are even graver to leave it there. You will not see that treasure in your lifetime.