WTC - were the buildings "pulled" ??

[TheDane]

Re: WTC - were the buildings "pulled" ??

TheDane this might explain why people working in the buildings days earlier were removed for some time and why bomb sniffing dogs were removed from duty. Great video.

Thanks, texastee !

The question is: If that is the truth about building 7. What is then the real truth about the twin towers ??

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Family Maps of Hinds County, Mississippi, Deluxe Edition - Grab it through Amazon!

[Treasure_Hunter]

Re: WTC - were the buildings "pulled" ??

That video on WTC 7 changes nothing for me other then they collapsed the building for what ever reason. 4 Planes were hijacked by terrorists, 2 hit the WTC, 1 hit the Pentagon, and 1 crashed in a field in PA.

If they wanted a way to go to war in the Middle East there were a lot easier ways to do so then attack outselves. There is no dramatic event that can not be questioned as a conspiracy if you wanted to.

 

[TheDane]

Re: WTC - were the buildings "pulled" ??

That video on WTC 7 changes nothing for me other then they collapsed the building for what ever reason.

Just 2 questions:

Why would they then later say they didn´t pull the building, why not admit it ??

If it is so that they "pulled" the building, why doesn´t the reason interest you ??

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

Re: WTC - were the buildings "pulled" ??

That video on WTC 7 changes nothing for me other then they collapsed the building for what ever reason.

Just 2 questions:

Why would they then later say they didn´t pull the building, why not admit it ??

If it is so that they "pulled" the building, why doesn´t the reason interest you ??

Doesn't change the fact we were attack by Muslim terrorists..........

 

[Newt]

Re: WTC - were the buildings "pulled" ??

Many don't understand( and haven't been there) how big the WTC's are.
From the video, the depth perception is not shown. A relatively little fire is just that.
The WTC towers were huge.

When steel is heated it loses strength. That's a fact.

Newt

 

[TheDane]

Re: WTC - were the buildings "pulled" ??

That video on WTC 7 changes nothing for me other then they collapsed the building for what ever reason.

Just 2 questions:

Why would they then later say they didn´t pull the building, why not admit it ??

If it is so that they "pulled" the building, why doesn´t the reason interest you ??

Doesn't change the fact we were attack by Muslin terrorists..........

That doesn´t really answer my 2 questions, does it ??

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

Re: WTC - were the buildings "pulled" ??

That video on WTC 7 changes nothing for me other then they collapsed the building for what ever reason.

Just 2 questions:

Why would they then later say they didn´t pull the building, why not admit it ??

If it is so that they "pulled" the building, why doesn´t the reason interest you ??

Doesn't change the fact we were attack by Muslin terrorists..........

That doesn´t really answer my 2 questions, does it ??

For me it does, doesn't matter to me if # 7 came down due to fire and damage on its own, or if it was imploded because of the damage it substained, neither one changes the fact that on 9/11 we were attacked by Muslim extremest terrorists..........

 

[Rooter]

Re: WTC - were the buildings "pulled" ??

Sorry but I had to do this.

Muslin (English pronunciation: /ˈmʌslɨn/, or less frequently: (/ˈmjuːsɨn/) is a type of loosely-woven cotton fabric, introduced to Europe from the Middle East in the 17th century. It became very popular at the end of the 18th century in France. Muslin is most typically an unbleached or white cloth, produced from carded cotton yarn. Wide muslin is sometimes called "sheeting", but not all sheeting is necessarily muslin. It is often used to make patterns for clothing, dresses or curtains, for example, but may also be used for upholstery. Muslin breathes well, and is a good choice of material for clothing meant for hot, dry climates.

 

[kuger]

Re: WTC - were the buildings "pulled" ??

The intense heat, helped by jet fuel, doesn't have to melt the steel supports, just soften them enough to sag.
Then the weight above overcomes them and crushes down.
The puffs down below that were seen would be the air compressed in the halls, stairways, and elevators being pushed out.


But that's no fun is it, much more interesting to attach yet another conspiracy theory to something.

Exactly!!

 

[TheDane]

Re: WTC - were the buildings "pulled" ??

Many don't understand( and haven't been there) how big the WTC's are.
From the video, the depth perception is not shown. A relatively little fire is just that.
The WTC towers were huge.

When steel is heated it loses strength. That's a fact.

Newt

Yes that is a fact, but was that fire enough to bring down those buildings the way they did ??

An important scientific problem has never been explained:

The buildings fell with a speed of FREE FALL !!
Scientists have calculated that the fall of one of the towers, with resistance of the floors, would last about 45 seconds.
HOWEVER IT TOOK LESS THAN 15 SECONDS !!

Is that because there was NO resistance ??

Watch these videos and judge for yourselves:

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

Re: WTC - were the buildings "pulled" ??

Many don't understand( and haven't been there) how big the WTC's are.
From the video, the depth perception is not shown. A relatively little fire is just that.
The WTC towers were huge.

When steel is heated it loses strength. That's a fact.

Newt

Yes that is a fact, but was that fire enough to bring down those buildings the way they did ??

An important scientific problem has never been explained:

The buildings fell with a speed of FREE FALL !!
Scientists have calculated that the fall of one of the towers, with resistance of the floors, would last about 45 seconds.
HOWEVER IT TOOK LESS THAN 15 SECONDS !!

I see the collapse starting just above where the damage was done and then following the way down with the additional weight of each floor adding to the speed, increasing to a free fall. Once a couple floors collapsed it was a free fall from then on as nothing was going to stop its fall.

As far as the few scientists comments, what do they really know about how long it will take, all they are doing is guessing. When was the last time a building of that size was ever pulled down....NEVER

There will always be a few looking for a conspiracy in every catastrophe that has any political implications........

 

[TheDane]

Re: WTC - were the buildings "pulled" ??

Many don't understand( and haven't been there) how big the WTC's are.
From the video, the depth perception is not shown. A relatively little fire is just that.
The WTC towers were huge.

When steel is heated it loses strength. That's a fact.

Newt

Yes that is a fact, but was that fire enough to bring down those buildings the way they did ??

An important scientific problem has never been explained:

The buildings fell with a speed of FREE FALL !!
Scientists have calculated that the fall of one of the towers, with resistance of the floors, would last about 45 seconds.
HOWEVER IT TOOK LESS THAN 15 SECONDS !!

I see the collapse starting just above where the damage was done and then following the way down with the additional weight of each floor adding to the speed, increasing to a free fall. Once a couple floors collapsed it was a free fall from then on as nothing was going to stop its fall.

As far as the few scientists comments, what do they really know about how long it will take, all they are doing is guessing. When was the last time a building of that size was ever pulled down....NEVER

There will always be a few looking for a conspiracy in every catastrophe that has any political implications........

Interesting that you use the expression PULLED DOWN !!

 

[Red James Cash]

Re: WTC - were the buildings "pulled" ??

WTC Hard Drives Show $100 Million In Criminal Credit Transfers Before Towers Fell

There was a sharp rise in credit card transactions moving through some computer systems at the WTC shortly before the planes hit the twin towers. This could be a criminal enterprise-in which case, did they get advance warning? Or was it only a coincidence that more than $100 million was rushed through the computers as the disaster unfolded?

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

Re: WTC - were the buildings "pulled" ??

Many don't understand( and haven't been there) how big the WTC's are.
From the video, the depth perception is not shown. A relatively little fire is just that.
The WTC towers were huge.

When steel is heated it loses strength. That's a fact.

Newt

Yes that is a fact, but was that fire enough to bring down those buildings the way they did ??

An important scientific problem has never been explained:

The buildings fell with a speed of FREE FALL !!
Scientists have calculated that the fall of one of the towers, with resistance of the floors, would last about 45 seconds.
HOWEVER IT TOOK LESS THAN 15 SECONDS !!

I see the collapse starting just above where the damage was done and then following the way down with the additional weight of each floor adding to the speed, increasing to a free fall. Once a couple floors collapsed it was a free fall from then on as nothing was going to stop its fall.

As far as the few scientists comments, what do they really know about how long it will take, all they are doing is guessing. When was the last time a building of that size was ever pulled down....NEVER

There will always be a few looking for a conspiracy in every catastrophe that has any political implications........

Interesting that you use the expression PULLED DOWN !!

I used "pulled down" only because you titled the thread as such...

 

[Red James Cash]

Re: WTC - were the buildings "pulled" ??

Heres an interesting little video about it.

 

[TheDane]

Re: WTC - were the buildings "pulled" ??

Maybe someone here can give an explaination for those explosions that the persons in that video hear ??