Re: XLT user's input please
Hello Ken,
I've had an XLT for about 7 years and have used it inland and at the beach for most types of metal detecting. The biggest drawback it has in my opinion is weight. Although this is a tradeoff with any brand that has graphic display along with all the extra features. I haven't been able to get the depth that I expected although most of my hunting is in soil that is highly compacted clay with rather high mineralization. I tried to remedy the weight problem with an accessory that attaches the upper part of the detector to my waist belt but it was cumbersome. One that would hang the control box from maybe a strap around the neck might work better. Having said all that, the many forms of target information that you can get with the XLT makes it a formidable detector in a variety of conditions. I recently hunted some fill dirt at a construction site with a friend that had a detector with no graphic display or tone id feature. This dirt was so littered with iron trash that it was almost impossible to hunt with any detector. I was able to pick out many more good targets than my friend. Having the xlt was a distinct advantage. I think that there is a few detectors out there that have better depth from the factory but the ton of id features on the xlt has spoiled me somewhat. It may boil down to what is the maximum number of features you can get at the least possible weight.
CAP