10 gram fatty

[1491]

Rang up as 12-25 on the Minelab eTrac in beach mud. Using the Coiltek 10 x 5 coil, plenty deep, and balances well with eTrac. Negative tide exposed some 'new' real estate. 😄 No karat marks, but has inscription that includes the Roman numeral III, in addition to owner's name. Anyone know what a ' III 17 / 12 ' character string represents, date-wise? [edit, after a little research, its apparent some Europeans still denote the month with a Roman numeral. So, March 17, 2012 seems the likely date. ]

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Agony and Death on a Gold Rush Steamer: The Disastrous Sinking of the Side-Wheeler Yankee Blade - Grab it through Amazon!

[Jose The Goon]

"1491", not sure of this, but possibly your ring is a pre-1906 wedding band that was made before Karat marks were required. Possibly 18K. (you should have it tested). Also, I see what appears to be 11/72 which could be the month and year of a wedding date etc.(November, 1872)
Congrats on your hefty gold find !! Nice ring !!

 

[1491]

"1491", not sure of this, but possibly your ring is a pre-1906 wedding band that was made before Karat marks were required. Possibly 18K. (you should have it tested). Also, I see what appears to be 11/72 which could be the month and year of a wedding date etc.(November, 1872)
Congrats on your hefty gold find !! Nice ring !!

Thanks for the reply! The 'date' portion reads ' III 17 / 12 ' (the wife and husband's names precede this and the engraving is stylistically, 'old'). Was wondering if lack of a jewelers mark might also indicate a non U.S. piece. Interesting that white gold apparently did not become commercially available until 1912. I will have it tested, seems on light side for platinum too.

 

[robertk]

Maybe the "III" is just a crudely done "11/" ? Which would make the date 11/17/72?

 

[1491]

Maybe the "III" is just a crudely done "11/" ? Which would make the date 11/17/72?

robertk, I added an additional photo of the date to the OP.

 

[mike b]

St. Patrics Day. March 17, 72 ?

 

[mike b]

Looking at it expanded, I see the "7" in 17 has a line across the vertical part We did that in the military so it wouldn't be confused with a #1. Now I see the "7" in 72 isn't crossed, it's hard for me to imagine an engraver doing one but not the other. So, the "72' might be a "12" not "72"

 

[robertk]

robertk, I added an additional photo of the date to the OP.

Ah. That's much clearer, and definitely a "III", not an "11/".

 

[1491]

It's a date format I haven't seen used before. The owner's name engraving is fairly ornate and not what I would call 'modern'.

 

[billb]

Congratulations on your success
Thanks for posting

 

[ArfieBoy]

Congratulations on a great find! Thanks for sharing. It is a beauty!

 

[OBN]

It's a date format I haven't seen used before. The owner's name engraving is fairly ornate and not what I would call 'modern'.

The design of the ring is more modern, 70's up. The inscribed almost looks Oriental, the names would be a clue to its age.. names can be dated to certain time periods and locations. I have many older gold rings, mine are all from the Eastern USA, time period 1860's up.. None look like your inscription......I'll post a few to show

And Nice save on the chunk of gold!

 

[1491]

The design of the ring is more modern, 70's up. The inscribed almost looks Oriental, the names would be a clue to its age.. names can be dated to certain time periods and locations. I have many older gold rings, mine are all from the Eastern USA, time period 1860's up.. None look like your inscription......I'll post a few to show

And Nice save on the chunk of gold!

View attachment 2174687View attachment 2174688View attachment 2174689View attachment 2174690View attachment 2174691View attachment 2174692

Thanks OBN, for sharing your pics and experience. Your age assessment is a better fit for the target profiles found at this spot over the years.

 

[DizzyDigger]

III 17 / 12

How about March 17th, 2012?

 

[1491]

III 17 / 12

How about March 17th, 2012?

Seems as likely as anything! Apparently, some Europeans still like to denote the month as a Roman numeral.

 

[DizzyDigger]

Seems as likely as anything! Apparently, some Europeans still like to denote the month as a Roman numeral.

Checked, and March 17th was a Saturday. Wedding day maybe?

 

[TORRERO]

Rang up as 12-25 on the Minelab eTrac in beach mud. Using the Coiltek 10 x 5 coil, plenty deep, and balances well with eTrac. Negative tide exposed some 'new' real estate. 😄 No karat marks, but has inscription that includes the Roman numeral III, in addition to owner's name. Anyone know what a ' III 17 / 12 ' character string represents, date-wise? [edit, after a little research, its apparent some Europeans still denote the month with a Roman numeral. So, March 17, 2012 seems the likely date. ] View attachment 2174576View attachment 2174609

In Europe they do the day first then the month, so it might be December 17. I don't know about the year..