What's new

1941 s mercury dime

nsdq

Silver Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
4,040
Reaction score
1,931
Golden Thread
0
Location
Tarpon springs FL
Detector(s) used
AT-Pro,Ace 150, flea market digger
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
i wanted to show everyone this not sure if is lg s or sm s , enjoy
 

Attachments

  • Picture 139.webp
    Picture 139.webp
    12.3 KB · Views: 402
  • Picture 143.webp
    Picture 143.webp
    15.3 KB · Views: 400
  • Picture 146.webp
    Picture 146.webp
    15.1 KB · Views: 437
  • Picture 145.webp
    Picture 145.webp
    18.6 KB · Views: 442
A closeup of the mint mark would help.
 
hope this helps ,,, apears to be in a high mint state
 

Attachments

  • Picture 159.webp
    Picture 159.webp
    12 KB · Views: 489
  • Picture 155.webp
    Picture 155.webp
    11.5 KB · Views: 491
  • Picture 154.webp
    Picture 154.webp
    11.8 KB · Views: 586
  • Picture 153.webp
    Picture 153.webp
    12.9 KB · Views: 594
It's not full torch bands, but it looks uncirculated, and the mint mark looks large.
 
I think it might have been cleaned. The wear on the details doesn't seem to match with the luster? I could be wrong. Can you get a pic that's more head on and closer of the mint mark?
 
capndan151 said:
I think it might have been cleaned. The wear on the details doesn't seem to match with the luster? I could be wrong. Can you get a pic that's more head on and closer of the mint mark?






not cleaned , no wear anywhere on it , very hard to get a good pic due light reflection,, has extremly sharp details , pics give it no justice
 
CoinHELP! said:
It's not full torch bands, but it looks uncirculated, and the mint mark looks large.
:icon_scratch: :help: not sure about the full bands , they look to be there to me
 
nsdq said:
CoinHELP! said:
It's not full torch bands, but it looks uncirculated, and the mint mark looks large.
:icon_scratch: :help: not sure about the full bands , they look to be there to me

The bands must be fully "split", and I can't see that for the middle band which is the area of concern.
 
CoinHELP! said:
nsdq said:
CoinHELP! said:
It's not full torch bands, but it looks uncirculated, and the mint mark looks large.
:icon_scratch: :help: not sure about the full bands , they look to be there to me

The bands must be fully "split", and I can't see that for the middle band which is the area of concern.
hope this helps can't get better pics coin is just that shiny
 

Attachments

  • Picture 167.webp
    Picture 167.webp
    15 KB · Views: 636
  • Picture 161.webp
    Picture 161.webp
    12.1 KB · Views: 632
  • Picture 180.webp
    Picture 180.webp
    11.9 KB · Views: 638
Better, but still not good enough, however I can see line in the middle band now. Are you using a smart phone for the images? You might try a scan, if you have one.
 
CoinHELP! said:
Better, but still not good enough, however I can see line in the middle band now. Are you using a smart phone for the images? You might try a scan, if you have one.
smart phone????? i use a old skool brickfor a cell , i was useing a web cam my good cam is broken
 
nsdq said:
CoinHELP! said:
Better, but still not good enough, however I can see line in the middle band now. Are you using a smart phone for the images? You might try a scan, if you have one.
smart phone????? i use a old skool brickfor a cell , i was useing a web cam my good cam is broken

LOL. About same quality though.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom