nsdq
Silver Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2011
- Messages
- 4,040
- Reaction score
- 1,931
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Tarpon springs FL
- Detector(s) used
- AT-Pro,Ace 150, flea market digger
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
- #1
Thread Owner
capndan151 said:I think it might have been cleaned. The wear on the details doesn't seem to match with the luster? I could be wrong. Can you get a pic that's more head on and closer of the mint mark?
CoinHELP! said:It's not full torch bands, but it looks uncirculated, and the mint mark looks large.
not sure about the full bands , they look to be there to mensdq said:CoinHELP! said:It's not full torch bands, but it looks uncirculated, and the mint mark looks large.![]()
not sure about the full bands , they look to be there to me
hope this helps can't get better pics coin is just that shinyCoinHELP! said:nsdq said:CoinHELP! said:It's not full torch bands, but it looks uncirculated, and the mint mark looks large.![]()
not sure about the full bands , they look to be there to me
The bands must be fully "split", and I can't see that for the middle band which is the area of concern.
smart phoneCoinHELP! said:Better, but still not good enough, however I can see line in the middle band now. Are you using a smart phone for the images? You might try a scan, if you have one.
?? i use a old skool brickfor a cell , i was useing a web cam my good cam is brokennsdq said:smart phoneCoinHELP! said:Better, but still not good enough, however I can see line in the middle band now. Are you using a smart phone for the images? You might try a scan, if you have one.?? i use a old skool brickfor a cell , i was useing a web cam my good cam is broken