NeoTokyo
Bronze Member
If you want to Investigate, expose and attack someone, go after people that makes our laws, not one of our opinionated brothers.
If you want to Investigate, expose and attack someone, go after people that makes our laws, not one of our opinionated brothers.[/Q
I didn't investigate a thing....or expose anything....and attack hardly......
I do what ever I can to support those who would take my rights via lies....I vote accordingly ..and educate those who don't know what I am dealing with as a gold miner.
One thing I try very hard to do is leave my opinion out of it...However when I am confused about something...when there is a situation I just don't understand I do ask questions...That's all I have done.
Keep in mind Neo that John makes it a point to make a negative remark about PLP on any thread that brings the ORG. up. He has stated why he does not support them whenever he can and given reasons....fact is by now he should just zip it when someone brings up PLP or new '49ers....but, he does have the right to keep saying what he does.....and since he does so will I!!!!
I just happen to be more articulate in my response and am not in the wrong questioning him....and as long as he keeps contradicting himself and ATTACKING the organizations that are the main reason we still have a shot at dredging(LEGALLY) I will point it out.....after all it is his words that are put here by him........I really don't have to do anything...I guess I am just paying more attention.
Gold Miner John = awesome
Voice of the gold mining community![]()
Why should John have to give an answer?
He has his reasons, let that be.
Freedom of speech also means freedom not to speak.
Simply put, it is driving you guys nuts because he is taking the high road and not arguing about something.
No one should be forced to be part of something because someone else is, just the same, no one should have to state their reasons for that choice IN PUBLIC for all to understand.
In all fairness, I agree with goldwasher in that I've seen the criticism and back and forth and all he has said multiple times is to hear from John with an explanation, yet everyone but John has come on to tell him how it is and that is very obvious and confusing in itself. What everyone has said defending John while holding validity is not an answer to his posts and while I have much respect for the majority on t net John and goldwasher included, I believe goldwasher has a point with his argument and John has yet to share his side on the matter.
At this point for myself its not about explaining himself to me in fine detail the reasons of his actions, but more so the fact that he cant even say basically what you have said for himself. I understand he doesnt have to do that but next time I see a post from him I guess i'll have to take it for what its worth..
Not a big deal at all, Im over it, not trying to get on anyone's bad side I just call it like I see it.
Trust me, I know where you are coming from, but it is what it is. We really have to be careful what we say on these forums - not only this one, but all the public forums. Miners have figured out quite inventive work arounds to get around the regs, and THEN they publish them on forums. Duh. It's like telling your opposition "lookie here, THIS IS HOW YOU NEED TO CHANGE THE WORDING TO INCLUDE THIS" and it hasn't worked out well for us. The miners need to find some sort of communication that is behind some sort of firewall. And not being terribly organized, THAT will most likely never happen. We are our own worst enemies, so be very careful about what you say about ANYTHING on this and any public forum.
This thread has evolved quite a bit. Suffice it to say, we REALLY have to be careful what we discuss in these public forums. If you know what I mean.......