42 regiment of foot knights guard button!!

Fyrguy86

Full Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
119
Reaction score
260
Golden Thread
0
Location
Landenberg, PA
Detector(s) used
Minelab CTX3030, Minelab Equinox 800, Minelab GPX5000, Garrett pro pointer
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
Yesterday I was invited to detect with my buddy (jimmydiggins) at one of his permissions. Started off with a few flat buttons and a bale seal. Got a deep 1-12 on the ctx. Thought it was a colonial button. After brushing lightly I seen some detail, but had no idea what it was till I textd my buddy VMI Digger. Instantly he knew what I had. This is my first regimental button!! Thanks Jonathan!!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5120.webp
    IMG_5120.webp
    70.2 KB · Views: 106
  • IMG_5119.webp
    IMG_5119.webp
    148.3 KB · Views: 99
  • IMG_5123.webp
    IMG_5123.webp
    44.3 KB · Views: 92
Upvote 12
Holy moly! That is some button! I'm very jealous;)

Congrats
 

Outstanding find-great piece of history. Congrats
 

I'm not so sure. It's very interesting but I am not convinced it's 42nd because the "4" is not at all in line with the crown. I've actually dug three of the 42nds you show the picture of so I am very familiar. Can I post it to a discussion group to see what they have to say? Also a British 42nd would usually have an iron shank... yours looks like it may have been a pewter shank.
 

Attachments

  • button 123.webp
    button 123.webp
    121.2 KB · Views: 71
Last edited:
I'm not so sure. It's very interesting but I am not convinced it's 42nd because the "4" is not at all in line with the crown. I've actually dug three of the 42nds you show the picture of so I am very familiar. Can I post it to a discussion group to see what they have to say? Also a British 42nd would usually have an iron shank... yours looks like it may have been a pewter shank.

I mentioned when I received the text pictures that the variety was not an exact match, however the crown design is spot on. The back does appear to bear the remnants of an integrated cast shank.
 

I mentioned when I received the text pictures that the variety was not an exact match, however the crown design is spot on. The back does appear to bear the remnants of an integrated cast shank.


That's what makes it interesting... but I'm not sure I'd say "not an exact match" because there is quite a difference, really. Even with the picture on the side I could tell it was different.
 

Thanks everybody. You can post it anywhere ya like iron patch lol. Looking at the record, the 42 was there, along with the 49th and 40th it said.
 

Last edited:
Shame it not all there, but at least you saved it. Make sure you preserve that one, as it will turn to dust.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom