Allotted weight a mule would carry

Tuscoro

Jr. Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
52
Reaction score
57
Golden Thread
0
Location
West
We have read of the many mule trains that made their way from the Northern mines of New Spain of the Spanish...
Has anyone ever found credible information which gave a standard of the weight each mule "did" carry, not what they "could" carry...
I realize it would depend on the mule bread but is there any documentation?

Thank you in advance...
Tuscoro
 
The US Army, I've read it, and forgotten. It's not as much as you might think. I shouldn't say because I truthfully don't remember, but my swag is 135lbs. That seems light, but it's also dead weight. The army had a mountain howitzer that was packed on three animals, and one mule carried the barrel of the gun, which weighed 224 lbs. When packing that gun, I suppose each animal was packing at least 200 lbs. When I packed mules in the southern Sierra Nevada, we packed pretty close to 200 lbs. per animal. I think the boss advertised 150 per mule, but we'd do the side load at a max of about 75 pounds each, and then throw on a top load. Anyhow, I don't know of any historical information on the weight of the loads, except for the Army manuals, which might be kind of hard to come by today.
 
I'm guessing it would also have to do with terrain & distance travelled in a day, or how quick the trip had to be.
 
The old mule im married to maxes out at the weight of her purse
 
I would say somewhere the equivilent of the average weight for a man maybe a little more. 200-250lbs I would think. Heavy loads on animals can be a slow task on movement in/on certain terrains, especially mountainous or rocky, IMO
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom