Chadeaux
Gold Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2011
- Messages
- 5,512
- Reaction score
- 6,409
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Southeast Arkansas
- Detector(s) used
- Ace 250
- Primary Interest:
- Cache Hunting
- #81
Thread Owner
I can't believe this thread has not been closed.
I deal with evidence and procedures in my daily professional life, and nobody can convince me that there is a conspiracy swirling around property corners. Yes, some greedy or dishonest person may move one to benefit himself, but we can restore it to its proper location. It's very hard to fool a land surveyor. It can happen occasionally, but not most of the time. More importantly, when those rare occasions occur, the conditions are not dictated by the dishonest landowner, but a series of neglects to the records and the properties. There's no conspiracies in this critical business.
That being said, we can never see anything 100% clearly. The events that have happened cannot be played back like we had a time machine; we can only sift the evidence and put the pieces together as clearly as we can in a systematic manner and come up with a conclusion that would hold up if we went to court. We constantly have a judge "sitting on our shoulders" so to speak. Our conclusions have to stand the test of reasonableness to our peers and to the court.
If I had to go to court and convince a judge and jury that there is a vast conspiracy to defraud the citizens of their land by the UN, I'd not only get laughed out of court, but lose my license to boot. And rightly so.
Belief systems (of which conspiracy theories are part of) are really all the same, and they are a manifestation of an untrained brain, or in some cases, an abnormal one. Paranoid and delusional thinking are not normal or healthy thought processes. As a matter of fact, these are the very characteristics of those who do the school shootings and other horrific acts.
This nicely sums it up by the famous German genius:
"A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything." — Friedrich Nietzsche
Apparently we have something in common. I spend too much of my time dealing with Federal Judges, multiple attorneys, court clerks, and more legal paperwork than you can shake a stick at.
That being said, I can assure you that not everything is as "cut and dry" as court records show them. The system doesn't show everything exactly as it happens. Sometimes the final analysis is something that has been agreed upon by counsel on both sides that has little if any relationship to the actual acts / conditions / motives of what happened. Perjury is very often overlooked in favor of a quick and clean resolution. Of course, I'm talking tort law and not criminal . . . unfortunately, the principle is very close to the same.
You should know that we are all aware that proving a conspiracy is difficult even when you have evidence of it because often the court is not as interested in truth as it is in quick resolution. We have become such a litigious society that the courts are overburdened with cases that should never see the light of day.
It is a fact that conspiracies happen. I prefer the old legal term of being in cahoots in a matter. Whether the allegations in my original post are fact or simply incorrect observation I stand by the thought that the behaviors are too similar, the backgrounds too similar. Genius I.Q. is not mental illness, it is just different from you and I.
The problem that arises is too often high I.Q. individuals are not "wise" in spite of their intelligence. They often are tractable and thus can easily be led down a path that resembles mental illness. When you lack the experience to discern what is being done, you are then in trouble. Drugs, hypnosis etc. have all had effects on the mentally "superior". It has happened, it will continue to happen.
The question then becomes: Is that what has happened here and in other cases where the M.O. is so very similar? The answer probably lies somewhere between what you have said and the question I raised.
I still do not believe in coincidences. It isn't likely, therefore, it is questionable.
Amazon Forum Fav 👍
Last edited: