Ancient Vaults, mines and crypts

[Quinoa]

It's quite possible they missed the dig spot. Lots of ways to use triangles... slingshotting thru the center of both triangles ends up crossing near the pink circled marker as well. I'd like to work it sometime, I don't know who owns the land. It's kind of a novelty to me being so close to town and obvious markers with hole already dug or at least attempted.. Probably tunneled in that hillside rather than straight down.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Treasure of Victoria Peak - Grab it through Amazon!

[lightspirt]

That's interesting - sounds like a take-off on the old disappearing ink trick. How does it work with your concoction? It sounds like a difficult process to get right re correct temperature of the rock to reveal the message.

Dog knows about the old disappearing ink pen trick. He had one of those placed in his pens when Ol' Kentuck was staying at his place. He was subjected to some major gas-lighting. But he fought thru it and maintained his sanity . Hopefully Ol'Kentuck is ok.

 

[Quinoa]

That's a great site with obviously manmade rock triangle monuments. I personally would have dug my hole in a bit different location. It's hard to be exact with the photo angle, but my best guess would be to find the triangle center points and bisect a line joining them.

View attachment 2065210

Interesting and viable take, also was just noticing, if they slingshotted exactly thru the center of each triangle from anchor corner, you would end up in a spot close to where that pink circled rock points...mappable geometry anyways. May have to try and talk to landowner sometime...

 

[David_Swift]

Followed markers to this. It's about 3 feet wide. It took me 6 hrs to hike to this. I thought it was a deep carving. Looking at pics, it's a door, I believe.

 

[robertk]

Followed markers to this. It's about 3 feet wide. It took me 6 hrs to hike to this. I thought it was a deep carving. Looking at pics, it's a door, I believe.

Looking at the leaves next to it, it sure looks awfully small to be a door.

 

[HMK959]

Followed markers to this. It's about 3 feet wide. It took me 6 hrs to hike to this. I thought it was a deep carving. Looking at pics, it's a door, I believe.

It can be a stone chest. You have to test it. It can also indicate the main entrance door or a similar area. Your picture is in the shape of an eye and next to it there is a stone in the shape of a triangle. I sent samples similar to your photo. (opened and not opened)

 

[David_Swift]

It can be a stone chest. You have to test it. It can also indicate the main entrance door or a similar area. Your picture is in the shape of an eye and next to it there is a stone in the shape of a triangle. I sent samples similar to your photo. (opened and not opened)

Very interesting. Attached is a picture overall picture of the area.

 

[HMK959]

Very interesting. Attached is a picture overall picture of the area.

Many shapes can be seen in this stone. including birds and human faces that are similar to the faces of the natives. Besides it can be a stone container, it can be a map of a mountain and a big rock in the same way. It means that whatever is important in this stone is also important in that mountain. Big and small, up and down, black and white, etc. are the puzzles they used. Maybe the rock is a map and the mountain is a storage place, and maybe the mountain is a map and the rock is a storage place. There is a method for diagnosis that I will send to you if you want to know.

 

[David_Swift]

Many shapes can be seen in this stone. including birds and human faces that are similar to the faces of the natives. Besides it can be a stone container, it can be a map of a mountain and a big rock in the same way. It means that whatever is important in this stone is also important in that mountain. Big and small, up and down, black and white, etc. are the puzzles they used. Maybe the rock is a map and the mountain is a storage place, and maybe the mountain is a map and the rock is a storage place. There is a method for diagnosis that I will send to you if you want to know.

Definitely want to know. I am obsessed with learning about this. Thank you

 

[Quinoa]

The shapes can be misleading in direction if that's all you look for, but the main thing to look for is things that stand out and seem out of place. Like giant solo boulders along waterways or on hillsides, especially ones placed on top of cliffs that can be seen from trails. It's just how you can mark places in a time long gone... The dilemma is not finding these places, it's finding the specific spots that these things generally mark out, which are mapped out and lost and no longer known.

 

[Crosse De Sign]

The shapes can be misleading in direction if that's all you look for, but the main thing to look for is things that stand out and seem out of place. Like giant solo boulders along waterways or on hillsides, especially ones placed on top of cliffs that can be seen from trails. It's just how you can mark places in a time long gone... The dilemma is not finding these places, it's finding the specific spots that these things generally mark out, which are mapped out and lost and no longer known.

I like your cliff face shadow pics, crypt carvings & stuff you've posted.
Cool stuff! At least auras may show us some things otherwise lost.

 

[Quinoa]

The general places are not hard to find but the specific places are. If you are solo, a 6-7 foot hand dug hole will take several days in rocky places...with two people you can do it in one day.. but filling it back in will take all you got.

Like health wise, on the edge. Anyways, nothing is straight forward. The traps are like 6-7 feet down, you hit a flat rock base that you have to dig under the sidewall to lift it, the sidewall has a boulder suspended on the side...they are old and don't move super fast, they were trapping things against their own people 5 years to come, not people 300-500 years in the future.

 

[cyzak]

Here is one right off a waterway.

 

[Crosse De Sign]

This is too good & interesting of a thread to just let it go...
I don't have these big cliff carvings, though the mountains
are older, & worn down where I live, I find it very intrigueing.
Thanks to Quinoa, for sharing your multi-faceted work here...

 

[Crosse De Sign]

 

[sdcfia]

This is too good & interesting of a thread to just let it go...

I don't have these big cliff carvings, though the mountains
are older, & worn down where I live, I find it very intrigueing.
Thanks to Quinoa, for sharing your multi-faceted work here...

By definition, you are classifying these as natural structures. That's exactly right - they aren't man made.

What's a mimetolith ?
n. 1.a. a natural topographic feature, rock outcrop, rock specimen, mineral specimen, or loose stone the shape of which resembles something else -- e.g., a real or fancied animal, plant, manufactured item, or part(s) thereof. b. a topographic feature, rock outcrop, rock specimen, mineral specimen, or loose stone, the surface pattern of which resembles a real or fancied animal, ... . c. a topographic feature (et alia) with any combination of shape and pattern that resembles a real or fancied animal, . . . . [Greek mimetes (an imitator) and lithos (stone); term coined by Thomas Orzo MacAdoo, first appeared in (Dietrich, 1989).

Are there actual carved mountain faces dating from approximately OT days? There are some of course, but they're typically Asian - the best may be the giant Buddha in Leshan, China. These things take enormous resources and skill to create and millennia later are still impressive. Mimetoliths are just that - natural "looks like", a pareidolia phenomena. Of course, legends can be hatched around these things with no other supporting evidence. And many have on TNet.

That said, here is a genuine carved head on a mountain, likely hundreds of years old, that I myself found a few decades ago. No "looks like" here - it "is". Why would it be important? Because of where he is found and the direction he is looking, plus a great deal of other supporting evidence.

 

[HMK959]

If you want to consider all of them natural, the question arises, why are all the parts of the face placed in the right place? Does nature recognize the nose, eyes, lips and...?

 

[Crosse De Sign]

Whether they're all natural, (which I seriously doubt) or not, I still find them very interesting.
There's likely no way to prove one way or the other, without a scientific team visit, so it's all
just speculation & intelligent opinion based on experience & theory. Anyway, nice art work,
natural or not... The term mimetolith is likely incorrect, & then no one really knows how old
the Earth is, or who all lived, or who all may have visited here, & it's all just food for thought.
The thing is, Quinoa has done lots of research in this area, & describes his findings clearly.
This thread is exceptional, & I'm sure just a drop of the things he's found out in the field...

 

[HMK959]

Have you seen the Nazca lines? It can only be seen from above. Look at these photos. It is related to Achaemenians and Parthians. The ancients were very intelligent and knowledgeable. They somehow carved the mountains to create the desired shade by the sun at a certain time of the year. It is a little hard for today's people to believe this science.

 

[HMK959]

Quinoa is a good teacher.