Ancient Vaults, mines and crypts

[HMK959]

Maybe this photo is interesting to you. If you turn the photo to the left, you will see a large face of a young man with his eyes closed and long hair on his forehead. And you see a small old man's face with open eyes and a big nose. And if you turn the photo to the right, you will see a large old man's face with closed eyes and a big nose, and a small young man's face with open eyes and the same long hair on the forehead.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Minelab PRO-FIND 35 Waterproof Pinpointer Metal Detector for Experts with Tone ID & Adjustable Sensitivity - Grab it through Amazon!

[sdcfia]

I'm not claiming that some of these things can't be used as landmarks. Many can be because they're easily recognizable by most humans. What I am saying is that they are not man made.
Were overseas explorers here in North America in OT days? Yes, I believe there is some intriguing evidence to support that. The North African/Middle Eastern military style ruins on top of Hidden Mountain (on the Rio Puerco in NM) and many non-native petroglyphs also there (including the decalog stone and a star map), plus additional cultural petroglyphs found in the lower Rio Grande Valley of NM are circumstantial evidence of Bronze Age activity in the American Southwest. Those guys didn't shape mountains into faces, but they did build things and carve messages on rocks.

 

[HMK959]

I'm not claiming that some of these things can't be used as landmarks. Many can be because they're easily recognizable by most humans. What I am saying is that they are not man made.
Were overseas explorers here in North America in OT days? Yes, I believe there is some intriguing evidence to support that. The North African/Middle Eastern military style ruins on top of Hidden Mountain (on the Rio Puerco in NM) and many non-native petroglyphs also there (including the decalog stone and a star map), plus additional cultural petroglyphs found in the lower Rio Grande Valley of NM are circumstantial evidence of Bronze Age activity in the American Southwest. Those guys didn't shape mountains into faces, but they did build things and carve messages on rocks.

Yes, at first glance, all people see and recognize, but do they know how to use them?

 

[Crosse De Sign]

I'm not claiming that some of these things can't be used as landmarks. Many can be because they're easily recognizable by most humans. What I am saying is that they are not man made.

Can you prove that nature made them? You are asserting your opinion, not science, no proof either way.
Just because there is no proof at all, can you persuade anyone that you're right with your assumptions?
Possibly, because as you have said, people are often times persuadable, or as you have put it, "Gullible".

So how do you know for sure, you don't. Columbus supposedly sailed unadvisedly, when it was widely
thought the world wasn't round, but square. So where did the knowledge of the now known previous
explorers go? Time passes, & then people have no real knowledge of what had taken place in older
times, but that doesn't mean there's no signs that are left for present time observators to prove or
disprove, in theoretical speculation... And without the scientific research, that's all it is. If it were all
naturally occurring then how did it happen for so many of them to resemble human like features?
If you are right, & no man or Angel, etc. had any part in creating those images, how is it that they
appear like they do? Doesn't it seem quite a bit unexplainably coincedental? What about Petra?

There's always been naysayers that say NO, & then there's often been achievers. Though much
of the Ancient's History has either been hidden, not understood, or not passed on & forgotten,
only the unknown mysterious and unexplained signs remain to be pondered, theorized, & so
speculated on. But when feasable hard evidence is found, it seems the doubters still say "NO".

 

[sdcfia]

I’m not trying to persuade anybody, just presenting a different perspective on a forum. People can believe what they want. As always, my opinions are subject to change, but only for a good reason.

 

[sdcfia]

Yes, at first glance, all people see and recognize, but do they know how to use them?

They may have a use, or they may have no particular use. There’s no way to tell unless there’s additional evidence.

 

[HMK959]

Look at these pictures. Turtle, lion, camel, eagle, frog, rabbit, human face, geometric shapes. ....Which do you consider to be the work of nature?

 

[Backwoodsbob]

I've been studying these type of formations. I call them the God code. I can show you many smaller examples that have been covered with dirt for some time. I can read what is on them. I can also show them in anything of nature. Weither they are of nature or man. They all have a message on them. They are words and numbers on all. Most have to do with good and evil, God verses Satan. For those who think it's parodelia, well you have to open your mind. Maybe one of the mysteries of the Bible that was to be revealed in time. Either way it is real. I challenge anyone who thinks that what is on these stones are just your brain playing tricks on you. For those like us who's eyes are open keep studying. Life is full of mysteries yet to be discovered. Some stones are the human heart. I have many examples of them. I know of 2 pyramids in my state yet to be discovered by others. I'm not ready to expose them yet. All will be revealed in time. The scientists who claim things are only saying what they have been taught. They are wrong in some cases. Cross and Q. Keep up your work. I would invite you to come visit me. I will give you all I know because you do have your eyes open. It's for a reason. May God Bless you in your research and help you understand what you see. They are many messages on these stones. It's not just on stones either. This planet has many secrets and it's not just here. For reasons I can't say is why I don't post much on here. I still see the same people who still deny others with their naysaying. This is history yet to be accepted by the establishment. It doesn't fit their ways of thinking. It will be revealed in time. I enjoyed the videos keep it up.

 

[Quinoa]

eye pupils

 

[cuzimloony]

eye pupils

This one has a pupil, but only if you look at it from one side.
I still cant bring myself to say its man-made yet, but something in me says "not natural" either. Maybe a bit of both.....

 

[Quinoa]

View attachment 2196952View attachment 2196953
This one has a pupil, but only if you look at it from one side.
I still cant bring myself to say its man-made yet, but something in me says "not natural" either. Maybe a bit of both.....

Yours indicates a peepsite thru that crack behind the eyeball. The eye sometimes says to look.

 

[KYgotGOLD]

Do you think there is a dig spot in this photo? Or nothing there in that photo? Or too exposed to hikers? Sure looks like a lot of work was done there.

So are you guys looking at rock formations as clues to finds?

 

[cyzak]

So are you guys looking at rock formations as clues to finds?

Only certain types of rock formations KY.The ones manipulated by man mostly permanent nothing like a RollingRock.

 

[Quinoa]

It's seen thru one of these spots I believe. You follow the crackline off the eye for one. The other has a little pointer. Those drill holes mean something as well, including the small one on the crackline off the eye. Might be a mine or crypt/chamber there.

 

[KYgotGOLD]

Looks to be normal rock

 

[cyzak]

Looks to be normal rock

To most it will look like a normal rock it takes a couple years of being out in the field and doing discovery. That is one of the reasons that they did this a lot of people just walk on by and never see anything.

 

[Quinoa]

They always look normal. I have a dozen or so pretty much like this. All with peep sights. Otherwise I wouldn't say anything at all. But, I have a vested interest. I have limitations. The people posting these type pictures can use the minor info for themselves. See what comes of it.