Arrowhead?

Adjove

Jr. Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
95
Reaction score
33
Golden Thread
0

Attachments

  • image-3282536557.webp
    image-3282536557.webp
    27.9 KB · Views: 182
  • image-1841078362.webp
    image-1841078362.webp
    16.7 KB · Views: 157
  • image-4093209917.webp
    image-4093209917.webp
    21 KB · Views: 151
  • image-3332421066.webp
    image-3332421066.webp
    25.6 KB · Views: 151
  • image-3372807769.webp
    image-3372807769.webp
    16.9 KB · Views: 161
Upvote 0
dosnt look knapped to me.looks like an interesting rock tho.My guess only.

I humbly stand corrected...:icon_thumright:
 

Last edited:
What you have there is a archaic period knife....It was flaked into form. Its a nice find. Keep searching the area you found it. You will find more artifacts....
 

Last edited:
Nice flake knife! :icon_thumleft:
 

Thanks all for great info and comments! I never would have guessed a knife. I was kayaking when nature called, so I pulled up to a rocky beach. I stepped out, took a few steps and behold this peculiar looking stone. I have been on this river hundreds of times literally and and never found an Native American artifact.
 

Attachments

  • image-748183391.webp
    image-748183391.webp
    38.3 KB · Views: 167
  • image-626904040.webp
    image-626904040.webp
    21 KB · Views: 144
Thats a cool story as to how you found it. You have probably stepped over them many times and never even noticed the artifacts. It takes time to see the difference. Most think they are just rocks. I look forward to seeing your next find. Good Luck, rock
 

Yep a big reduction flake with secondary edge work. A quick sharp tool. That is my guess. :thumbsup: Nice find.
 

Love flake tools. That's a nice flake knife. Similar to what's shown at the link. They date to all culture periods.

http://ksartifacts.info/14RC424/14RC424-5 unifacial flake knife.jpg
Charl, very nice link! Also "They date to all culture periods." It is impossible to date a knife of this nature to a culture or time period, unless it is found in context with other artifacts. It can with relative association, to a site specific culture site, but is not considered fact.

One other thought! I have never liked the term uni-faced/uni-facial, which implies there is only one face. For me the term A Bi-facial artifact with uni-facial work is correct. But this is just a thought by me.:cat: Again not to hi-jack a thread, but here is a knife I found earlier this year, with minimal work. This is to demonstrate how simple a tool can be and can be over looked by the most experienced artifact hunter.DSCN0420.webpDSCN0421.webpDSCN0423.webp

Now you all proly saying to yourselves " Oh gawd not the new guy again, wont he just shut up!":dontknow::icon_scratch:??? Yeah I will back off, this is your site and I am new here. Do not want to make a pest of myself.
Again thanks! I am just use to giving my two cents worth.
 

Chase2, I agree it's very easy to overlook flake tools. In my neck of the woods, jasper is uncommon, and most jasper flakes show usage as flake tools or simply utilized flakes. But after awhile, most collectors will spot flake tools. If you're trying to put together an unbiased collection from a site, such casual tools are part of the assemblage. Except for some specialized tools, they can't be dated out of context the way point types can.

The link came from this page, which has many examples of flake tools...

http://ksartifacts.info/14RC424/14RC424artifacts.html
 

Last edited:
Not as sharp as it once was after it's time in the river, but I bet if you tried you still do some serious cutting with it.

Nice find, often overlooked.
 

Knife if so great. Glad you found it - good luck to you :)
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom