johnnyblaze
Silver Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2010
- Messages
- 3,214
- Reaction score
- 1,770
- Golden Thread
- 2
- Location
- Rhode Island
- 🥇 Banner finds
- 2
- Detector(s) used
- T2 SPECIAL EDITION
- Primary Interest:
- Other
If it was lead it would have a white patina on it..Iron Patch said:Looks like mid to late 18th century, but probably lead not silver. A real nice one though.
johnnyblaze said:If it was lead it would have a white patina on it..Iron Patch said:Looks like mid to late 18th century, but probably lead not silver. A real nice one though.
And if it was pewter the shank would be broken from a bend like that..
John

TheDane said:Iron Patch said:Looks like mid to late 18th century, but probably lead not silver. A real nice one though.
To me it looks like arsene-bronze !
I can agree on mid 18th century !![]()
It could be lead or it could be 'white tombac'

CC Hunter said:It could be lead or it could be 'white tombac'
Tombac alloy does indeed generally exhibit a characteristic shiny surface, even when recovered centuries later.
However, tombac is a very hard and brittle material, often being found cracked or broken. Of all of the thousands of tombac items I've seen recovered, I cannot recall ever seeing one that was bent. Tombac will most likely fracture into pieces as soon as any stress is encountered.
CC Hunter
CRUSADER said:Looks like 20th C aluminium to me
johnnyblaze said:If it was lead it would have a white patina on it..Iron Patch said:Looks like mid to late 18th century, but probably lead not silver. A real nice one though.
And if it was pewter the shank would be broken from a bend like that..
John
CC Hunter said:It could be lead or it could be 'white tombac'
Tombac alloy does indeed generally exhibit a characteristic shiny surface, even when recovered centuries later.
However, tombac is a very hard and brittle material, often being found cracked or broken. Of all of the thousands of tombac items I've seen recovered, I cannot recall ever seeing one that was bent. Tombac will most likely fracture into pieces as soon as any stress is encountered.
CC Hunter
CRUSADER said:johnnyblaze said:CRUSADER said:Looks like 20th C aluminium to me
You gotta be joking....Right
No, nothing about the look of that button screams 18th C. Everything to me points to a much later manufacture. The moulding is a clear give away, you will find nothing like it in the 18th C. The scratches also give away the modern look of the metal. It screams 20th C to me. Try & find an 18th C example with the same crispness & definition as that one & you will not be able to, I assure you.
Tombac is totally not possible with this one, you will find none with moulded raised work (like this) with integral loop. The stratches & slight bowing are also not consistant with Tombac damages.
Its modern.
