Can You Scientifically Prove to the World That LRLs Work?

[EddieR]

You are absolutely wrong. In my statement above, which you quoted, I brought up what has actually been posted by skeptics. They have said that the user would never make it public, and then turn around and say they would sell it. Once again, do your research before you post. Look it up.

I don't recall reading anything like that. I think you are mistaken.

At any rate, how does that answer the topic question, "Can You Scientifically Prove to the World That LRLs Work?"

It seems that that whole train of thought is just a diversion away from facing the facts of the thread topic.

So, can you or can't you?

Of course you don't remember reading it (even though you posted it). I didn't expect you to. As I also knew you would try to divert attention away from your possible (probable) mistake.

Owned.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

DR.ÖTEK Metal Detector, Waterproof Gold Detector, Pinpoint & Terrain Modes, Professional Metal Detector - Grab it through Amazon!

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

Aw, Dell, you haven't been keeping up, have you. You can get it done for free! Take a look at A Scientific Test for LRLs, and pick one! That's all it takes. Then you won't need to bother with debunkers anymore!

It's not my responsibility to do your testing for you. Any manufacturer would jump at the chance to show Scientific proof that his product really worked (except for those who's products don't work, of course!)

We have told you what we think about your Scientific Test for LRLs and that if you want that test you are free to spend you own money.
We have ask you a 100 times to tell us which of the 100’s of LRL models “don’t work”..Could you please explain how you know what kind of Scientific proof the manufactures are not showing you?

 

[GuyinWH]

~EE~

Aw, Dell, you haven't been keeping up, have you. You can get it done for free! Take a look at A Scientific Test for LRLs, and pick one! That's all it takes. Then you won't need to bother with debunkers anymore!

It's not my responsibility to do your testing for you. Any manufacturer would jump at the chance to show Scientific proof that his product really worked (except for those who's products don't work, of course!)

We have told you what we think about your Scientific Test for LRLs and that if you want that test you are free to spend you own money.
We have ask you a 100 times to tell us which of the 100’s of LRL models “don’t work”..Could you please explain how you know what kind of Scientific proof the manufactures are not showing you?

Gee.... where to begin? Heck you said it yourself ART (your quote was my tag for sometime)...
"The science doesn't concern you because it didn't matter"
...or some garbage like that.
Either way, LRL manufacturers can't show that their devices work in any scientific way, shape, or form
because any kid fresh out of college with an EE can tell you that all those devices, regardless of the model,
violates the law of information theory in regards to communications/transmissions and a host of other laws
which are necessary for a device to function if it is to read any data from ANYWHERE using any sort of a power source!

Unless your freaking LRL Fraud machines are powered by your crazy imagination and the help of casper the ghost (or
your dead ancestors or something crazy like that) then you cannot explain WHY or HOW it functions so you have no business
arguing about the FUNCTIONS to begin with when we know full well IT CANNOT WORK because NOTHING in any field of
science can back up your fraud boxes (hence why they have all lost ever single case that has been brought against them in court).

Oh yeah last time i checked I think i was looking at algorithmic information theory and how that didn't even fit (think one of you
brought it up somewhere)... Worse comes to worse..... your fraud boxes even fall to the almighty Occams freaking razor!!!
(The simplest explanation will be the most plausible until evidence is presented to prove it false.) Simplest explanation is they're a FRAUD!
You can't even give a DECENT argument without ad-hominem or running in circles, none of you can. All you do is act subversive and give bull excuses and finish up with non-sensical "i'm an experienced treasure-hunter" or
"i'll find more this weekend than you will because of LRLs" to try to convince anyone new to these forums that your devices are legitimate
without even trying, much less intending to. And you still do not show a single ounce of credible evidence for us to go by.

I can literally go on TechXtra, Intute, scirus, and deepwebtech, and load up on at least 2 dozen+ scientific laws and principles which all LRLs violate in one form or another!!! I know I have posted about two or three in the past but have yet to see anything from you all. Please DO explain!
This has been gone over various times. It's tiring to have to go back and forth because you keep being subversive and playing games.
Actually do us a favor, go on those search engines and look for your fraud boxes on there... maybe you'll learn why you and your
pseudo-science fraudboxes are a freaking joke.

Unfortunately, I know you are all in on this fraud and I'm wagering on you all getting busted sometime..... so I don't expect you to come back with even 1 very good reason why LRLs can (you won't find any) or cannot work in their current form and will probably check on this thread again in a few hours only to see one of you retort with some subversive gimmick again.... (why not you manage to do it every time). And don't get me wrong
I actually do appreciate your responses.... your subversive comments and your run arounds actually help us out alot and show us, and anyone new here, that you are completely clueless and void of any knowledge as to how these devices really work (well they don't that's the point).

 

[werleibr]

To answer the ridiculous question posed in this thread, NO, I cannot scientifically prove to the world that my LRL's work. I am not a Scientist, nor do I have finances to hire a legitimate qualified Scientist to conduct all the necessary testing, and proving it to the world. And neither do I have any interest in doing so.

If you wish unquestionable Scientific proof to the world, or to yourself, you are free to do so at your own expense. Not mine.

End of discussion. Dell

Really.. You don't have the funds? charging $5,000 a day for treasure hunting experience. hmmmmm.

It is a Professional service. Others in this business have charged $10,000 a day + expenses and even a percentage of the finds. My rates are only half that. Dell

 

[EE THr]

You are absolutely wrong. In my statement above, which you quoted, I brought up what has actually been posted by skeptics. They have said that the user would never make it public, and then turn around and say they would sell it. Once again, do your research before you post. Look it up.

I don't recall reading anything like that. I think you are mistaken.

At any rate, how does that answer the topic question, "Can You Scientifically Prove to the World That LRLs Work?"

It seems that that whole train of thought is just a diversion away from facing the facts of the thread topic.

So, can you or can't you?

Of course you don't remember reading it (even though you posted it). I didn't expect you to. As I also knew you would try to divert attention away from your possible (probable) mistake.

Owned.

You never answer a question directly, just like the rest of your kind.

So I'll provide the translation: NO, Eddie can't Scientifically prove to the World that LRLs work.

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

Aw, Dell, you haven't been keeping up, have you. You can get it done for free! Take a look at A Scientific Test for LRLs, and pick one! That's all it takes. Then you won't need to bother with debunkers anymore!

It's not my responsibility to do your testing for you. Any manufacturer would jump at the chance to show Scientific proof that his product really worked (except for those who's products don't work, of course!)

We have told you what we think about your Scientific Test for LRLs and that if you want that test you are free to spend you own money.
We have ask you a 100 times to tell us which of the 100’s of LRL models “don’t work”..Could you please explain how you know what kind of Scientific proof the manufactures are not showing you?

What does any of that matter? It doesn't. It's just a diversion away from the topic title!

Translation: NO, Art can't Scientifically prove to the World that LRLs work.

 

[EddieR]

You are absolutely wrong. In my statement above, which you quoted, I brought up what has actually been posted by skeptics. They have said that the user would never make it public, and then turn around and say they would sell it. Once again, do your research before you post. Look it up.

I don't recall reading anything like that. I think you are mistaken.

At any rate, how does that answer the topic question, "Can You Scientifically Prove to the World That LRLs Work?"

It seems that that whole train of thought is just a diversion away from facing the facts of the thread topic.

So, can you or can't you?

Of course you don't remember reading it (even though you posted it). I didn't expect you to. As I also knew you would try to divert attention away from your possible (probable) mistake.

Owned.

You never answer a question directly, just like the rest of your kind.

So I'll provide the translation: NO, Eddie can't Scientifically prove to the World that LRLs work.

And you ignore questions, change wording to fit your agenda, and reply to side topic questions just fine until you are cornered then you suddenly want to go back to the main topic.

So I'll provide the TRUE translation: EE has no experience, no reading comprehension, poor memory concerning what he and others have previously posted, and zero credibility.

 

[EE THr]

And you ignore questions, change wording to fit your agenda, and reply to side topic questions just fine until you are cornered then you suddenly want to go back to the main topic.

So I'll provide the TRUE translation: EE has no experience, no reading comprehension, poor memory concerning what he and others have previously posted, and zero credibility.

He who trys to substitute flames for facts, is admitting that he has no facts.

It's soooooo obvious that you are just another LRL promoter puppet.

 

[EddieR]

And you ignore questions, change wording to fit your agenda, and reply to side topic questions just fine until you are cornered then you suddenly want to go back to the main topic.

So I'll provide the TRUE translation: EE has no experience, no reading comprehension, poor memory concerning what he and others have previously posted, and zero credibility.

He who trys to substitute flames for facts, is admitting that he has no facts.

It's soooooo obvious that you are just another LRL promoter puppet.

Well, thanks for finally admitting you have no facts!

 

[EE THr]

And you ignore questions, change wording to fit your agenda, and reply to side topic questions just fine until you are cornered then you suddenly want to go back to the main topic.

So I'll provide the TRUE translation: EE has no experience, no reading comprehension, poor memory concerning what he and others have previously posted, and zero credibility.

He who trys to substitute flames for facts, is admitting that he has no facts.

It's soooooo obvious that you are just another LRL promoter puppet.

Well, thanks for finally admitting you have no facts!

Maybe that would be cute if you were in Kindergarten.

But now, if that's the best you got, you should be embarrassed.

 

[EddieR]

And you ignore questions, change wording to fit your agenda, and reply to side topic questions just fine until you are cornered then you suddenly want to go back to the main topic.

So I'll provide the TRUE translation: EE has no experience, no reading comprehension, poor memory concerning what he and others have previously posted, and zero credibility.

He who trys to substitute flames for facts, is admitting that he has no facts.

It's soooooo obvious that you are just another LRL promoter puppet.

Well, thanks for finally admitting you have no facts!

Maybe that would be cute if you were in Kindergarten.

But now, if that's the best you got, you should be embarrassed.

I'm embarrassed.....for you.......that it took such an elementary tactic to make you dance.

Owned.

 

[GuyinWH]

And you ignore questions, change wording to fit your agenda, and reply to side topic questions just fine until you are cornered then you suddenly want to go back to the main topic.

So I'll provide the TRUE translation: EE has no experience, no reading comprehension, poor memory concerning what he and others have previously posted, and zero credibility.

He who trys to substitute flames for facts, is admitting that he has no facts.

It's soooooo obvious that you are just another LRL promoter puppet.

Well, thanks for finally admitting you have no facts!

Maybe that would be cute if you were in Kindergarten.

But now, if that's the best you got, you should be embarrassed.

I'm embarrassed.....for you.......that it took such an elementary tactic to make you dance.

Owned.

wow...
you come here expecting a bit of maturity and this is all you get...
of course thats the guy with a lame cartoon as his avatar... go figure.

 

[werleibr]

Common now kids.....Lets get back on topic and leave the school yard tactics down.

 

[EE THr]

Common now kids.....Lets get back on topic and leave the school yard tactics down.

Heh-heh---they seldom post on-topic. That seems to be a no-no in the instructions from their handlers. And when they do, for this topic, they only post stuff like, "We can, but we don't feel like it, so nee-ner, nee-ner, nee-ner."

 

[EddieR]

Common now kids.....Lets get back on topic and leave the school yard tactics down.

Heh-heh---they seldom post on-topic. That seems to be a no-no in the instructions from their handlers. And when they do, for this topic, they only post stuff like, "We can, but we don't feel like it, so nee-ner, nee-ner, nee-ner."

You are referring to the skeptics when asked a question, correct? That does seem to be par for the course, it seems.

 

[EddieR]

And you ignore questions, change wording to fit your agenda, and reply to side topic questions just fine until you are cornered then you suddenly want to go back to the main topic.

So I'll provide the TRUE translation: EE has no experience, no reading comprehension, poor memory concerning what he and others have previously posted, and zero credibility.

He who trys to substitute flames for facts, is admitting that he has no facts.

It's soooooo obvious that you are just another LRL promoter puppet.

Well, thanks for finally admitting you have no facts!

Maybe that would be cute if you were in Kindergarten.

But now, if that's the best you got, you should be embarrassed.

I'm embarrassed.....for you.......that it took such an elementary tactic to make you dance.

Owned.

wow...
you come here expecting a bit of maturity and this is all you get...
of course thats the guy with a lame cartoon as his avatar... go figure.

Based on your name calling posts that show an extreme lack of tact, I have no other recourse than to consider that a compliment from you. But do me a favor: If you can't respond to others like you were taught in your Anger Management classes, perhaps you should sit back, relax, and study your Pseudo-Skeptic's Bible more. Maybe you will pick up on something you missed the first couple of times you skimmed through it, possibly in your haste to try to be accepted somewhere.

 

[EE THr]

The score so far---

LRL Makers and Promoters Who Can Scientifically Prove to the World That LRLs Work
0

 

[GuyinWH]

The score so far---

LRL Makers and Promoters Who Can Scientifically Prove to the World That LRLs Work
0

:-D

Exactly, hence why there's people in here with 0 brain cells to rub together, still trying to win
an argument they lost before they even opened their web browser. Post above yours is a great example.

 

[EddieR]

The score so far---

LRL Makers and Promoters Who Can Scientifically Prove to the World That LRLs Work
0

:-D

Exactly, hence why there's people in here with 0 brain cells to rub together, still trying to win
an argument they lost before they even opened their web browser. Post above yours is a great example.

Wow...
you come here expecting a bit of maturity and this is all you get...
and this coming from a guy that can't figure out how to set up an avatar...go figure

 

[aarthrj3811]

The score so far---

LRL Makers and Promoters Who Can Scientifically Prove to the World That LRLs Work
0

You are correct

:-D

Exactly, hence why there's people in here with 0 brain cells to rub together, still trying to win
an argument they lost before they even opened their web browser. Post above yours is a great example.