What's new

COLONIAL SILVER HAND MADE CATHOLIC MEDAL?

HEAVYMETALNUT

Silver Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
3,465
Reaction score
2,997
Golden Thread
6
Location
CT
🥇 Banner finds
6
Detector(s) used
White's MXT All Pro,White's MX Sport , White's XLT E-Series,White's eagle spectrum,White's Silver Eagle & White's 4000-D
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
got out with Frank for a few hours.took him to one of my sites that has been pounded in the past by me,rcat & sniffy.
today i got in the cellar hole and worked the lip of the hole from inside.
it paid off in a few finds.
a barrel tap,a old fork, a broken pewter shoe buckle frame portion and what i thought was a piece of pocket watch guts at first but rubbed it and suprise :o it's real silver and hand etched with what looks like a pope on one side and the other side looks like it may be saint Anne or saint Anthony holding a flower.with initials SA.
i don't know how old this silver piece dates back to? but,the etching looks to be that age and it's a 1780's site.this may be a "one of a kind" medal?
 

Attachments

  • OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 002 [].webp
    OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 002 [].webp
    24.3 KB · Views: 1,960
  • OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 005 [].webp
    OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 005 [].webp
    65.1 KB · Views: 1,920
  • OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 003 [].webp
    OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 003 [].webp
    52.2 KB · Views: 1,927
  • OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 004 [].webp
    OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 004 [].webp
    27.6 KB · Views: 1,921
  • OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 006 [].webp
    OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 006 [].webp
    17.8 KB · Views: 1,922
  • OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 014 [].webp
    OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 014 [].webp
    31.7 KB · Views: 1,897
  • OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 010 [].webp
    OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 010 [].webp
    24.7 KB · Views: 1,895
  • OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 009 [].webp
    OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 009 [].webp
    24.8 KB · Views: 1,894
  • OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 008 [].webp
    OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 008 [].webp
    26.4 KB · Views: 1,930
  • OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 007 [].webp
    OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 007 [].webp
    17.3 KB · Views: 1,908
  • OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 015 [].webp
    OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 015 [].webp
    35 KB · Views: 1,900
  • OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 012 [].webp
    OCT 3ND HUNT WITH FRANK COLONIAL RELIGEOUS MEDAL 012 [].webp
    33.3 KB · Views: 1,887
Upvote 0
scratcher said:
Great finds HMN :icon_thumright: I think it is interesting that the silver piece is shaped similiarly to pieces of indian trade silver I have seen. There were Catholic misssionaries in the northeast..... :dontknow:



Does it appear that the hole was made after the engraving? In other words, does it punch through the engraving or does the engraving start after the edge of the hole? It almost looks like the hole was made later :dontknow:
thanks! well i don't know i suppose the hole was made after the carving or etching was done
 
Thats an awesome find
 
very nice Fork and Medal ! :o :o :o
 
Could that Catholic medal possibly be Indian trade silver? The reason why I say that is because of how thin it is and the shape. Just a thought.

Your Friend,

Steve in Michigan
 
Steve in Michigan said:
Could that Catholic medal possibly be Indian trade silver? The reason why I say that is because of how thin it is and the shape. Just a thought.

Your Friend,

Steve in Michigan
i don't know steve :dontknow: i hope somebody can tell me :icon_scratch:
 
HEAVYMETALNUT said:
scratcher said:
Great finds HMN :icon_thumright: I think it is interesting that the silver piece is shaped similiarly to pieces of indian trade silver I have seen. There were Catholic misssionaries in the northeast..... :dontknow:



Does it appear that the hole was made after the engraving? In other words, does it punch through the engraving or does the engraving start after the edge of the hole? It almost looks like the hole was made later :dontknow:
thanks! well i don't know i suppose the hole was made after the carving or etching was done

It might be worth measuring the thickness with digital calipers. It's worth trying to rule out trade silver because a Catholic piece would be very unusual. I think it would be odd to have engraving on both sides, though. And a silversmith of the time would likely have made a neater hole. But it looks to me that was done later, maybe after it was broken off a little higher 'up'. Do the edges look rough like they were cut with scissors, or is it really smooth? A very cool piece :icon_thumleft:
 
scratcher said:
HEAVYMETALNUT said:
scratcher said:
Great finds HMN :icon_thumright: I think it is interesting that the silver piece is shaped similiarly to pieces of indian trade silver I have seen. There were Catholic misssionaries in the northeast..... :dontknow:



Does it appear that the hole was made after the engraving? In other words, does it punch through the engraving or does the engraving start after the edge of the hole? It almost looks like the hole was made later :dontknow:
thanks! well i don't know i suppose the hole was made after the carving or etching was done

It might be worth measuring the thickness with digital calipers. It's worth trying to rule out trade silver because a Catholic piece would be very unusual. I think it would be odd to have engraving on both sides, though. And a silversmith of the time would likely have made a neater hole. But it looks to me that was done later, maybe after it was broken off a little higher 'up'. Do the edges look rough like they were cut with scissors, or is it really smooth? A very cool piece :icon_thumleft:
the edges are smooth.i don't have any digital calipers to measure it.and you may be right about a larger loop being broke off above hole
 
Sweet finds, the item I highlighted in red appears to be a musket part, usually brass and would hold the barrel to the stock, as for age it would be hard to say as they are used on modern reproduction muskets too. I love the silver item, in my opinion it appears to have been crafted from a sterling spoon. :icon_thumleft:

Steve

P.S. Sorry, I didn't see the previous post on the gun part and that it was already ID'd. 8)
 

Attachments

  • OCT_3ND_HUNT_WITH_FRANK_COLONIAL_RELIGEOUS_MEDAL_011_[].webp
    OCT_3ND_HUNT_WITH_FRANK_COLONIAL_RELIGEOUS_MEDAL_011_[].webp
    30.1 KB · Views: 384
Goldiver said:
Sweet finds, the item I highlighted in red appears to be a musket part, usually brass and would hold the barrel to the stock, as for age it would be hard to say as they are used on modern reproduction muskets too. I love the silver item, in my opinion it appears to have been crafted from a sterling spoon. :icon_thumleft:

Steve

P.S. Sorry, I didn't see the previous post on the gun part and that it was already ID'd. 8)
thanks! no problem on the previous ID.i don't think this medal was crafted from a spoon.
 
I strongly disagree with many earlier posts regarding a later date ,due to the nature of the hole
I am a semi - professional silversmith , I know silver pretty well , A hole like that could indeed
have been punched and enlarged by using an awl - a sharpened and tapered steel implement ,
with one very sharp edge pushed, and turned into the pilot hole so as to enlarge it - would indeed
remove the requisite amount of metal , while simultaneously raising the flange that is clearly evident ,
This flange would also be enhanced thru the wearing of the item on a chain . I would think this item
is solidly 18th century - just the opinions of one man - and I am no expert ! Argentium.
 
Argentium said:
I strongly disagree with many earlier posts regarding a later date ,due to the nature of the hole
I am a semi - professional silversmith , I know silver pretty well , A hole like that could indeed
have been punched and enlarged by using an awl - a sharpened and tapered steel implement ,
with one very sharp edge pushed, and turned into the pilot hole so as to enlarge it - would indeed
remove the requisite amount of metal , while simultaneously raising the flange that is clearly evident ,
This flange would also be enhanced thru the wearing of the item on a chain . I would think this item
is solidly 18th century - just the opinions of one man - and I am no expert ! Argentium.

Hi Argentium. I don't think you are referring to anything I posted, but I just wanted to clear up that I also think that it is 1700's. I do, however, think the hole was made at a later date than the engraving. None of the silversmith made trade pieces I've seen have holes like that. Only the native made pieces. Cool piece :thumbsup:
 
scratcher said:
Argentium said:
I strongly disagree with many earlier posts regarding a later date ,due to the nature of the hole
I am a semi - professional silversmith , I know silver pretty well , A hole like that could indeed
have been punched and enlarged by using an awl - a sharpened and tapered steel implement ,
with one very sharp edge pushed, and turned into the pilot hole so as to enlarge it - would indeed
remove the requisite amount of metal , while simultaneously raising the flange that is clearly evident ,
This flange would also be enhanced thru the wearing of the item on a chain . I would think this item
is solidly 18th century - just the opinions of one man - and I am no expert ! Argentium.

Hi Argentium. I don't think you are referring to anything I posted, but I just wanted to clear up that I also think that it is 1700's. I do, however, think the hole was made at a later date than the engraving. None of the silversmith made trade pieces I've seen have holes like that. Only the native made pieces. Cool piece :thumbsup:
thanks guys! what kind of tool or scribe would they have used to get these angles cuts into the silver? some type of blade? it's not scratched in each cut has a bevel to it
 
HEAVYMETALNUT said:
scratcher said:
Argentium said:
I strongly disagree with many earlier posts regarding a later date ,due to the nature of the hole
I am a semi - professional silversmith , I know silver pretty well , A hole like that could indeed
have been punched and enlarged by using an awl - a sharpened and tapered steel implement ,
with one very sharp edge pushed, and turned into the pilot hole so as to enlarge it - would indeed
remove the requisite amount of metal , while simultaneously raising the flange that is clearly evident ,
This flange would also be enhanced thru the wearing of the item on a chain . I would think this item
is solidly 18th century - just the opinions of one man - and I am no expert ! Argentium.

Hi Argentium. I don't think you are referring to anything I posted, but I just wanted to clear up that I also think that it is 1700's. I do, however, think the hole was made at a later date than the engraving. None of the silversmith made trade pieces I've seen have holes like that. Only the native made pieces. Cool piece :thumbsup:
thanks guys! what kind of tool or scribe would they have used to get these angles cuts into the silver? some type of blade? it's not scratched in each cut has a bevel to it

I think the tool a silversmith would have used is called a graver.
 
Wow...never seen anything like that before! This Catholic boy is IMPRESSED!

Great Find.


:icon_thumright:

Banner Vote!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom