THE TRUE SEEKER
Jr. Member
- #1
Thread Owner
In March 2019, two local ecologists—Roger Doger de Spéville and Georges Désiré Némorin—stumbled upon what appeared to be pirate artifacts while hiking in the eastern region of Rodrigues Island in Republic of Mauritius, specifically in the Vallée St François area. They described finding: rusty chest, decayed rope from a pulley setup, a metal rod that had fallen from the chest, and finally a goat’s skull mounted on a shiny metal body, that might possibly even be gold.
The duo wasn't treasure hunting; they were on an ecological survey, which later proved crucial for legal claims. They photographed the site and filed a sworn affidavit on May 15, 2019, alerting authorities. By June 11, the Rodrigues Regional Assembly was informed, and the site was secured with 24/7 military guards to prevent looting.
Under Mauritian Civil Code (Article 716), undiscovered treasures belong to the state, but accidental finds on private land split 50/50 between the finder and landowner. Since the hikers "accidentally" discovered it, they argued for a share.Conversely, if treasure is discovered through intentional exploration activities, no profit can be obtained.
However, the supposed treasure disappeared.
Was this treasure truly a pirate treasure in the first place?
I believe that not only in this case, but in all cases, it is only by thoroughly investigating the findings through various disciplines such as archaeology, history, and numismatics, and then integrating those research results, that we can deduce whether the discovered treasure originated from pirates.If treasure is found through illegal exploration, archaeological information about what items were found, where, and in what quantity is lost.Therefore, searching for pirate treasure must be legal.
What do you think?
The duo wasn't treasure hunting; they were on an ecological survey, which later proved crucial for legal claims. They photographed the site and filed a sworn affidavit on May 15, 2019, alerting authorities. By June 11, the Rodrigues Regional Assembly was informed, and the site was secured with 24/7 military guards to prevent looting.
Under Mauritian Civil Code (Article 716), undiscovered treasures belong to the state, but accidental finds on private land split 50/50 between the finder and landowner. Since the hikers "accidentally" discovered it, they argued for a share.Conversely, if treasure is discovered through intentional exploration activities, no profit can be obtained.
However, the supposed treasure disappeared.
Was this treasure truly a pirate treasure in the first place?
I believe that not only in this case, but in all cases, it is only by thoroughly investigating the findings through various disciplines such as archaeology, history, and numismatics, and then integrating those research results, that we can deduce whether the discovered treasure originated from pirates.If treasure is found through illegal exploration, archaeological information about what items were found, where, and in what quantity is lost.Therefore, searching for pirate treasure must be legal.
What do you think?
Last edited: