? thats lame.. im opening each of the dfg folders and readin them one by one..whwen is the decision made to let us back in the water.2cmorau said:Hefty1
i don't know where your getting your info but this is how it reads
(g) Number of Permits. The Department shall issue a maximum of 4,000
30. permits annually, on a first-come, first-serve basis. Any permits
31. issued in 2011 will apply toward the limitation of 4,000 permits for
32. 2012.
Hefty1 said:
I give up!!!

the court? whos reading the feedback?Tarkus said:Personally I think the time for knee jerk reactions is done, use our brains(those who still have one) and figure the best way to light a fire under these frickin politicians in our favor.
Any and all of us with vested interest in this need to stop whining, it just an excuse not to do anything.
1) Submit rational comments on their proposals, backed up with facts if possible.
2) Call, FAX and E mail every politician you know of, to put pressure in our favor. ( If they don't I personally vow to do anything possible to make sure they can't get reelected, even as dog catcher)
3) Get everyone you know to respond, prospectors or not.
4) Take the time to explain to those who don't know, lack of education we can cure, ignorance is fatal.
5) We who do this as hobby or profession are the authority's on this, start acting like it, rebut the BS with good science and experience.
6) Those who want to complain and snivel, with out proposing solutions, Shut the F#*k up
Good luck
I've got letters to write


??and is it one judge or some commitee that is going to look at these results ans say oh that seems like the best one.. i dont see anywhere in there anything that looks like the positive feedback and just arguments presented by us helped at all
...and really the stuff i read in the general fishing community was either not there or not that bad...other than the stuff up by Klamath...and the public in my community as far as the coverage of the meetings here etc. was on the miners and recreatotrs...so......ahhhhhhhh 