naturegirl
Bronze Member
I finally got to sit down and try it. I have a new understanding of the drawings. Now I appreciate the importance of studying the flaking, not just the form. Thanks to neanderthal for recommending some books. They don't have photos, they have drawings. I was able to Id a point that I hadn't been able to with the overstreet book. I know flaking is the key to the whole thing, but I haven't been able to watch one being knapped, so I still have a BIIIGGG gap in my understanding. (Wildlife expo this weekend, so I'll get to see it in person).
Thirty7, you said you could recommend some books on drawing the points? I find I really have a lot of questions now. Do you choose a position and not move the point? or pick it up and turn it around so the light shows you all facets? What do you choose to leave out, if anything? I have a "sketchy" style of drawing, but I don't think that is so good for this purpose. I noticed you have a definite style that shows with each of the drawings you shared with us. I know each artist must have, but if one wants to do a very technical, precise illustration, should personal style be put aside for accuracy? I don't want to be a pro here, just do a good job representing what I'm looking at. Besides, it's fun
So here's my first attempt, it's pretty shaky, haven't drawn in a while. The drawing from the book is of a yarbrough also. It seems to have left out a lot of small details that I'm sure were on the point, so I quit trying to put in everything I could see. All criticism is welcome!
ng
Thirty7, you said you could recommend some books on drawing the points? I find I really have a lot of questions now. Do you choose a position and not move the point? or pick it up and turn it around so the light shows you all facets? What do you choose to leave out, if anything? I have a "sketchy" style of drawing, but I don't think that is so good for this purpose. I noticed you have a definite style that shows with each of the drawings you shared with us. I know each artist must have, but if one wants to do a very technical, precise illustration, should personal style be put aside for accuracy? I don't want to be a pro here, just do a good job representing what I'm looking at. Besides, it's fun
So here's my first attempt, it's pretty shaky, haven't drawn in a while. The drawing from the book is of a yarbrough also. It seems to have left out a lot of small details that I'm sure were on the point, so I quit trying to put in everything I could see. All criticism is welcome!
ng
Attachments
Upvote
0
just whacking around on a rock!







