Hopefully not for awhile. 1,000 years will do.
The Multi Cruiser came out and...and what? Not enough reviews on it yet it seems.
Has enough time passed to say that the jury is in and the verdict is that the equinox series is capable and good value?
Chub
Just ask yourself "What would John - Edmonton do?" and you will have your answer...
Just ask yourself "What would John - Edmonton do?" and you will have your answer...
capable?! Hell nah, it's AWESOME. The price makes it the best detector on the market for the money.
Speed like DEUS
Depth like CTX
Waterproof better than CTX
Handles saltwater better than Excal.
Priced better than an AT-Pro.
More responsive to tiny gold than almost all other detectors.
Replaces 8 individual detectors.
How is that not the best thing since sliced bread?
I
So the multi kruzer is the half of the equinox that nobody uses...
Without wanting to sound cruel , it ( along with many other brands and models) needs to be dropped by at least $150 to be considered by someone like me as reasonable value.
As stated in another thread, cant wait for some new machines from FT. it would have to be one HECK of a detector to have people dump all these equinoxes.
Chub
White bread toasted with butter, not that fake margarine.![]()
☠ Cipher;5800272 said:My only complaints are the build quality. The lower lock collar, and the thin coil casing specifically. I can make it false if I put incidental downward pressure on the coil. A bit concerning, but otherwise, I agree. No better deal on the market for all it does.
Ironically the word Multi is used in its name. Maybe its all down to semantics....'simultaneous' is the word people want to read. The equinox can also search in individual frequencies yet from what I read here its the one aspect of the Equinox that isnt really used !! and its the only aspect offered by the multi kruzer.
.....
Chub
Thats interesting, I haven't had any problems of falsing from pressure being applied to the coil and I've caught myself doing it a few times when leaning down to recover a target. I think their QC must have been lax on these first units in order to get them out the door faster. I got a good one, but it seems more than a few have the "wobbly coil rod".
I don't think ML realized just how good the multi-IQ was going to be. I appears that the plan was to let users pick the best frequency or use multi for a general hunting scenario. Even the gold mode was originally supposed to be single freq but tester results proved the multi to be superior there too.
I think the next gen of the EQX will be multi-freq only.
Doesn't the manual suggest multi IQ for every setting LOL I think they knew.
I also think they just included single FREQ to shut certain people up by giving them that option hehehe.