First Hunt With New X35 Coil - Silver!

secondstar

Hero Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2017
Messages
790
Reaction score
2,940
Golden Thread
0
Location
North Central Connecticut
Detector(s) used
XP Deus, Minelab Equinox, Garrett Ace Apex
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Good afternoon everyone, my new 9 inch X35 coil just arrived so I thought that I would put it through its paces. I went to a stretch of woods, loaded up my 12 kHz full tones coin program, cranked sensitivity up to 95, and within an hour or so, wham!

ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1553976301.194682.webp

This coin was on edge about 5 inches down, this coil hit the target hard! So far so good with this coil, I can’t wait to try a certain relic program that some of you guys have had success with.

Mike
 

small silver on edge is pretty good, a real confidence booster. congrats
 

I love the stability of this coil, and I’m glad that I made the jump to full tones. I knew that I had a coin underneath my coil the second that I heard the tone, it was unmistakable.
 

Are you using any discrimination in full tones?
 

I am running zero discrimination in full tones. Every once in a while I need to bump it up to one or two in order to eliminate chatter, but that doesn’t happen all that often.
 

I am running zero discrimination in full tones. Every once in a while I need to bump it up to one or two in order to eliminate chatter, but that doesn’t happen all that often.

The reason I ask is that I used to be a big full tones, zero disc proponent. I still have that programmed into my remote because it works fine. But I have really moved on from full tones and use it very rarely - perhaps coin shooting at clean (no iron) sites, but mainly use 5 tones or pitch now. The reason being that I mainly hunt at sites that do have lots of iron or iron trash (because those are the sites that still have the keepers) and I need to be able to both hear the iron AND not have it affect the non-ferrous target IDs (ferrous can down and even up average non-ferrous target IDs) and target IDs in general are unstable in the presence of thick iron which makes full tones sound nuts. That is where discrimination and iron volume comes in. I typically run pitch in super thick iron or 5 tones in moderate iron, with disc set at around 7.5 and iron volume at 2 or 3.

I think there are a lot of myths about using discrimination with the Deus that have cropped up over the years (like disc affecting depth). The following is more about putting to bed those myths and providing awareness about some of the advantages of using disc rather than trying to steer folks away from full tones or steering you towards discrimination-based programs. If something is working for you, then stick with it. This is not directed at secondstar specifically (you may already know all this), but just some info to anyone running 0 disc as food for thought...

Why not just run 0 disc if I am hearing the iron anyway?

Running with disc does three things for you: (1) it helps prevent ferrous up/down averaging as previously mentioned and ground chatter; (2) it enables proper, stable operation of the horseshoe depth and ferrous indicator display which becomes unreluable at disc < 6, and (3) enables you to run with the lower tone bin in multi tone mode. If you run 0 disc in multi-tones, like in some of Gary's programs, you effectively turn 5, 4, and 3 tone programs into 4, 3, and 2 tone programs.

Why not run disc with full tones? You cannot run disc and still have iron volume in full tones. It is an all or nothing proposition. You can either chose to hear the iron at 0 disc or silence below the disc setting.

Don't you lose depth with disc? Not if it is set at 10 or less and even at settings above 15, the depth loss is not significant depending on soil type.

Don't high conductors sound better in full tones than multitones? They do at the default multitone high bin tone frequency. To make silver stand out, I crank the high bin frequency setting to it's max setting of 993 Hz (and the low (ferrous) bin to 120 hz).

Finally, if you do not want to hear the iron at all just use iron volume 0 with disc or full tones with disc (the iron volume setting has no effect in full tones).
 

Last edited:
Great write up vferrari! I tend to coin shoot in areas where there is lots of modern trash and have noticed my clad and silver count go up since switching to full tones. To me, coins tend to “pop” a bit more in full tones. I do have a 5 tones version of my coin program that I still use. I was wondering if you would be willing to share your pitches and tone breaks? I am looking forward to trying pitch at some of the cellar holes that I hunt, I’ve made a 25 kHz version of Calabash’s relic program now that I’ve got the X35.
 

The pitches are as I describe above - 120 hz for the low/ferrous tone bin (normally 200 hz) and 993 Hz for the high (silver) tone bin (normally 800 hz). For all the "in between" tone bins I use the default pitch settings, this works for 3, 4, and 5 tones. Since I use ID NORM off, the breakpoints have to be set up for the coil frequency in use. This is a pain, but I like to be able to see how TID varies with frequency because that can clue you into certain things like whether you are getting ferrous falsing. That is one thing that you don't have to worry about for full tones since the breaks automatically vary as target ID varies with frequency (or not if you do use ID Normalization). The high break is usually at around 90 at 28 KHZ for me and at about 80 - 85 for 8 and 12 khz respectively. HTH
 

Do you ever “double” the low 120 Hz tone, or in other words use it to cover both the discrimination range (up to 10 for example) and then reuse it for perhaps up to 35 given running in 12 kHz? I noticed that Gary from the UK tends to do this.
 

Do you ever “double” the low 120 Hz tone, or in other words use it to cover both the discrimination range (up to 10 for example) and then reuse it for perhaps up to 35 given running in 12 kHz? I noticed that Gary from the UK tends to do this.

Gary does this because he doesn't tend to use discrimination, so when he wants to create a usable tone break for low conductors above iron he has to use back-to-back low tone bins with the second tone "representing" the ferrous break which would normally be where you would set discrimination. Lack of using discrimination forces him to "lose" a tone bin which makes his sonar program, for example, effectively a two-tone program (ferrous/non-ferrous) using 3 multi-tones. I honestly do not see the point of doing that since XP saw fit to provide iron volume, there is no reason to waste a tone bin by stubbornly refusing to use discrimination as Gary is inclined to do for reasons unclear. Using an iron tone for low conductors above iron is not something I like to do because I want the iron tone to stand out from any non-ferrous tone. So to answer your question, no, that is something I don't do.
 

Last edited:
That makes sense, it still never ceases to amaze me, the degree to which this machine can be customized.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom