Am I wrong in thinking that common sense is not totally dead in congress? Enhanced background checks sounds like a great idea to the masses of folks who don't know their muzzle from their buttstock but, just how would it be enforced? Example: Joe Jones has quit hunting and sells his rifle to John Smith. Neither man ran down to their local ffl licensed dealer to have their backgrounds checked, there is no birth certificate for Joe's old 30-30, and there's no way anyone could say that John didn't have it all along.
Same situation. Joe has a table at the gun show. John would sure like that old 30-30 but, alas, Joe tells him he can't sell it to him at the show, but meet me outside afterwards, and it can be yours.
Could it be that those clever anti-constitution folks down there in D.C. have a plan to remedy that particular situation if enhanced background checks can just become a reality? There would be no way of enforcing that law without knowing who owned what. Simple they say; now that we've required everyone to have their personal history checked through the "common sense" farce that we've successfully foisted upon the law abiding citizens, we can only further impose our will through another government bureaucracy. We must now establish an enhanced national database. The owner must register the type and serial number of every firearm, regardless of type. Thusly, anyone caught in possession of an unregistered firearm would be guilty of a felony and his gun could be confiscated and destroyed.
Am I just being cynical?