H3 Tecs dirty little secret out - devices not sold to Military 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: H3 Tec's dirty little secret out - devices not sold to Military 2

aarthrj3811 said:
Interesting enough... you can't back up your words like a real man. It appears when you solicit fraud, you lose your manhood, too.

Also interesting is your amazing ability to identity a "military base" from a photo of people holding a product.

Gee SWR..You posted the photo are you claiming the photo is fake? firsthttp://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,375415.msg2666594.html#msg2666594



Art---

If you are certain of your claim, then you must have documented evidence, such as a government Purchase Order or contract, which shows that the H3TEC was sold the military.

So please post the document.

:dontknow:





A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."
 

Re: H3 Tec's dirty little secret out - devices not sold to Military 2

Art---

If you are certain of your claim, then you must have documented evidence, such as a government Purchase Order or contract, which shows that the H3TEC was sold the military.

So please post the document.
No EE..It is SWR claim.... http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,375415.msg2666594.html#msg2666594
I just ask him a few simple questions in post #1 He has been spinning, twisting, ducking and dodging since post #1 dated Jan 7, 2011..Art
The article is dated July 22, 2010….So what is the dirty little secret? Do you have something more recent to post? Do you have a date for the part about the Army Testing ?Please keep us informed…Art
 

Re: H3 Tec's dirty little secret out - devices not sold to Military 2

aarthrj3811 said:
Art---

If you are certain of your claim, then you must have documented evidence, such as a government Purchase Order or contract, which shows that the H3TEC was sold the military.

So please post the document.
No EE..It is SWR claim.... http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,375415.msg2666594.html#msg2666594
I just ask him a few simple questions in post #1 He has been spinning, twisting, ducking and dodging since post #1 dated Jan 7, 2011..Art
The article is dated July 22, 2010….So what is the dirty little secret? Do you have something more recent to post? Do you have a date for the part about the Army Testing ?Please keep us informed…Art


The whole story has been told. An individual supposedly brought one with his personal stuff, and that's the extent of it.

If you claim there was a sale or contract, show your military documentation thereof.






A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."
 

Re: H3 Tec's dirty little secret out - devices not sold to Military 2

The whole story has been told. An individual supposedly brought one with his personal stuff, and that's the extent of it.
If you claim there was a sale or contract, show your military documentation thereof.

What Claim are you talking about”
I know that I went to high school back in the 1950’s and I don’t think that the definition of a question has changed to claim.
So what is the dirty little secret? Do you have something more recent to post? Do you have a date for the part about the Army Testing ?Please keep us informed…Art
 

Re: H3 Tec's dirty little secret out - devices not sold to Military 2

We all know there will be no documents forthcoming.

Also noticeable is there are NO LRL proponents/pro-Fraudsters posting in this thread supporting Art's skewed logic and inability to read and comprehend the presented text.

Speaks volumes when they abandon their own.
Thank You for all your spinning and twisting and dodging and ducking..I now have the answer..and the insults I wanted ...Art
 

Re: H3 Tec's dirty little secret out - devices not sold to Military 2

aarthrj3811 said:
The whole story has been told. An individual supposedly brought one with his personal stuff, and that's the extent of it.

If you claim there was a sale or contract, show your military documentation thereof.

What Claim are you talking about”

…Art



Art, when you say that SWR is wrong about H3TEC not selling units to the military, you are therefore claiming that they did.

So if you want to claim that H3TEC sold units to the military, show your proof.

It's all very simple and straightforward. Nothing complicated.

If you say that you know, then the only way you can really know, is if you have the proof. And if you have the proof, then show it.

It's like poker, Art. When you are called, you must show your hand, or lose the pot. :dontknow:

So, what do you have?






A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."
 

Re: H3 Tec's dirty little secret out - devices not sold to Military 2

Art, when you say that SWR is wrong about H3TEC not selling units to the military, you are therefore claiming that they did.
So if you want to claim that H3TEC sold units to the military, show your proof.
It's all very simple and straightforward. Nothing complicated.
If you say that you know, then the only way you can really know, is if you have the proof. And if you have the proof, then show it.
It's like poker, Art. When you are called, you must show your hand, or lose the pot.
So, what do you have?
Yes..this is the answer that the skeptics always post when they do not want to answer questions and have run out of excuses and insults..Art
 

Re: H3 Tec's dirty little secret out - devices not sold to Military 2

Re: H3 Tec's dirty little secret out - devices not sold to Military 2
Reply To This Topic #39 Posted Today at 04:09:07 PM
Also noticeable is there are NO LRL proponents/pro-Fraudsters posting in this thread supporting Art's skewed logic and inability to read and comprehend the presented text.

Speaks volumes when they abandon their own.
Re: H3 Tec's dirty little secret out - devices not sold to Military 2
Reply To This Topic #42 Posted Today at 04:43:41 PM
Also noticeable is there are NO LRL proponents/pro-Fraudsters posting in this thread supporting Art's skewed logic and inability to read and comprehend the presented text.

Speaks volumes when they abandon their own.
 

Re: H3 Tec's dirty little secret out - devices not sold to Military 2

aarthrj3811 said:
Art, when you say that SWR is wrong about H3TEC not selling units to the military, you are therefore claiming that they did.
So if you want to claim that H3TEC sold units to the military, show your proof.
It's all very simple and straightforward. Nothing complicated.
If you say that you know, then the only way you can really know, is if you have the proof. And if you have the proof, then show it.
It's like poker, Art. When you are called, you must show your hand, or lose the pot.
So, what do you have?
Yes..this is the answer that the skeptics always post when they do not want to answer questions and have run out of excuses and insults..Art



Then, I guess you don't know how to play poker.

Sorry to have confused you.

:dontknow:




A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom