Re: Here's a good idea when you find a ring
Noodle, your stance, taken to its logical conclusion, would really mean that we all shouldn't even take our rings to the smelters at all. No matter how long we *think* they've been in the ground, because there's no statue of limitations on lost and found, right? The laws of each state, in regard to "found property" do NOT deal with things like how long a person thinks the item was lost for. The laws strictly deal with value, with NO regard to age. Afterall, a person who wears an antique ring, can loose it yesterday, no? And you find it, see that it's old-looking, and assume it's lost 100 yrs. ago? Therefore the laws have no time stipulations. All items over a given value must (if you wanna be technical) be turned into police lost and found.
So to be logical, with your stance, and "GIVE them back to the rightful owners", there would never be any smelters involved, from the git-go! Only after the police return your un-claimed item, is it yours, and only then can you send it to the smelters. Of course NONE OF US does this. But I'm only saying that, in a wierd sort of way, coins-4-cheese has a point. Of course the way it's put, in terms of maximum value gained, it sounds like a hustle. But once you follow down the rabbit trail, the alternative is equally as un-inviting.
I have re-united rings with owners, (like class rings that I was able to trace through initials), and did NOT get a "reward" that would have been more than the melt value. So from a strictly capitalist view, I'd have been better to throw it in to my melt box. But on the other hand, I wasn't angling for best value to begin with.
This is a strange topic, because of course, most of us got into this hobby thinking that ...... on top of fun and exercise, there'd be some potential $$ from the finds, right? So with the latter in mind, why WOULDN'T a person think from that angle? But the minute you do that, someone else comes along and quotes laws and such. Strange indeed
