Good morning, and as it's been a while since I posted, thanks for the pictures.
You're still getting the same sort of advice about your machine. I can see that you've invested an incredible amount of time in design and construction in your machine. The issue that's being addressed over and over again by real miners are the real-world conditions you'll have to confront in actual mining conditions.
I was a prospector for many years (far more than your 10) before I started mining. What I thought would work for mining as a prospector got turned right on its head when I started mining. I had a partner that did the same as I for many years, we prospected together, metal detected for nuggets together before we started mining. He's a brilliant fabricator. He built a far more robust "mini" excavator than yours (3 prototypes to be exact) and they all faced the same issues: when you hit compacted channel material, the size of the material you work and the solid nature of the material are too severe for small excavators. He was able to do some limited sampling if the material was loose enough, or if he was able to anchor his machine, but in most cases, the "mini" excavator concept is not viable.
The dredge with the flapper concept needs real-world dredging application. When you dredge (I've done a lot of it) the suction produced drags or snaps the rocks to the nozzle, and anything it wants to pull, it pulls. That means all different sizes, shapes, lengths, widths of cobbles. With a human on the end to visually sort, you still have issues with rocks slamming on the end of the nozzle, rocks flipping in the hose after they've entered the nozzle to generate jams, etc., etc. I can't see your flapper being able to handle the multiple variables or the rapid speed required to run your flapper to stop jams: it all happens far too fast in actual dredging conditions.
Once again, beach deposits, or deposits in very loose soil or smaller size deposition concentrations loosely compacted, yes, for your excavator. The dredge with no way to monitor the intake, no. I don't see that working.
I believe you've spent a lot of serious energy, money, time, sweat-equity in your machine, and it's time to realize it's realistic abilities. As it's designed and constructed right now, it has a very limited scope of operations. As others have said, and I've spent many years with full-scale, full-sized mining operations, they use much larger equipment to do their testing as small stuff wastes too much time and won't give them an accurate sample size for their larger production needs.
I don't believe anyone is being negative with malicious intent; we're trying to respond to your requests for sincere feedback about genuine mining or testing conditions so you can make an informed, realistic decision about the marketable possibilities of your machine to any possible interested parties.
I wish you all the best as you pursue the suggestions about real-world mining that you're receiving from experienced miners,
Lanny