dragonsbreath
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2004
- Messages
- 101
- Reaction score
- 0
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Cwmbran,South Wales
- Detector(s) used
- explorer II plus Detech 15 x 12" Coil
- #1
Thread Owner
If the crust looks very hard, my advice would be to leave it. If you clean it aggressively the patina could come off with the crust. You could if your'e patient soak it in oil for a week, then "gently" work on the crust with a cocktail stick. Or soak it in baby oil which is slightly corrosive for a few days, then work on the crust. Some people on this site swear by using peroxide, never used it myself, so I can't comment. Good luck dragonsbreath, let us know what you do, good find either way.dragonsbreath said:I am looking for suggestions as how to clean off the very hard encrustation without
damaging this brooch please?
Its design is of a serpent swallowing its tail but does not show up well in the scan...

robfinds said:If the crust looks very hard, my advice would be to leave it. If you clean it aggressively the patina could come off with the crust. You could if your'e patient soak it in oil for a week, then "gently" work on the crust with a cocktail stick. Or soak it in baby oil which is slightly corrosive for a few days, then work on the crust. Some people on this site swear by using peroxide, never used it myself, so I can't comment. Good luck dragonsbreath, let us know what you do, good find either way.dragonsbreath said:I am looking for suggestions as how to clean off the very hard encrustation without
damaging this brooch please?
Its design is of a serpent swallowing its tail but does not show up well in the scan...![]()

but the method I stated is the one I use always on Bronze Artifacts of that age, and they have never looked worse than what they were before. The key I posted had signs of Bronze decease when found, and the Patina was coming off, it was wrapped in Olive oil and tissue and was kept like that until I sold it.....but the choice is yours dragonsbreath said:Thanks very much guys for the constructive replies...
I agree that aggressive cleaning is out of the question
BUT as it is it shows very little true detail and i really do not have much
to lose by adopting the wrap in olive oil and leave for a while approach
as suggested by Silver Searcher then i think that is what i will try.
Just as added info this was found in close proximity to several bits
of Saxon long brooches and another two annular like the above, these items
have been duly recorded with the F.L.O. for the area found which was in the
East Midlands of England.
The site is now off limits as a suspected Saxon burial area.
But surrounding fields are still o.k.
Thanks to all for your comments PaulB.
shaun7 said:dragonsbreath said:Thanks very much guys for the constructive replies...
I agree that aggressive cleaning is out of the question
BUT as it is it shows very little true detail and i really do not have much
to lose by adopting the wrap in olive oil and leave for a while approach
as suggested by Silver Searcher then i think that is what i will try.
Just as added info this was found in close proximity to several bits
of Saxon long brooches and another two annular like the above, these items
have been duly recorded with the F.L.O. for the area found which was in the
East Midlands of England.
The site is now off limits as a suspected Saxon burial area.
But surrounding fields are still o.k.
Thanks to all for your comments PaulB.
Are they going to dig there Paul?
dragonsbreath said:shaun7 said:dragonsbreath said:Thanks very much guys for the constructive replies...
I agree that aggressive cleaning is out of the question
BUT as it is it shows very little true detail and i really do not have much
to lose by adopting the wrap in olive oil and leave for a while approach
as suggested by Silver Searcher then i think that is what i will try.
Just as added info this was found in close proximity to several bits
of Saxon long brooches and another two annular like the above, these items
have been duly recorded with the F.L.O. for the area found which was in the
East Midlands of England.
The site is now off limits as a suspected Saxon burial area.
But surrounding fields are still o.k.
Thanks to all for your comments PaulB.
Are they going to dig there Paul?
Its yes when funds allow old chestnut Shaun lol Happy Hunting M8t
I find that amazing, and down right frustrating. was the field that produced these finds ploughed land
if it was there is no reason to stop detecting it, the finds are already out of context by ways of the farming activities. This one of the reasons I tell Archy's nothing and will keep on working that way 

not a lot of people know this, but if the land owner does not want you to declare the find site , you don't have to. Gold silver or other wise, this is hidden in the small print of the law.Silver Searcher said:So you recorded the finds and they stopped you from detectingI find that amazing, and down right frustrating. was the field that produced these finds ploughed land
if it was there is no reason to stop detecting it, the finds are already out of context by ways of the farming activities. This one of the reasons I tell Archy's nothing and will keep on working that way
Sorry you lost a good spot Paul
SS
Yes I did know that Rob, our Villa site the owner there doesn't want to know what we find and doesn't want us to tellrobfinds said:not a lot of people know this, but if the land owner does not want you to declare the find site , you don't have to. Gold silver or other wise, this is hidden in the small print of the law.Silver Searcher said:So you recorded the finds and they stopped you from detectingI find that amazing, and down right frustrating. was the field that produced these finds ploughed land
if it was there is no reason to stop detecting it, the finds are already out of context by ways of the farming activities. This one of the reasons I tell Archy's nothing and will keep on working that way
Sorry you lost a good spot Paul
SS
Robert.
robfinds said:not a lot of people know this, but if the land owner does not want you to declare the find site , you don't have to. Gold silver or other wise, this is hidden in the small print of the law.Silver Searcher said:So you recorded the finds and they stopped you from detectingI find that amazing, and down right frustrating. was the field that produced these finds ploughed land
if it was there is no reason to stop detecting it, the finds are already out of context by ways of the farming activities. This one of the reasons I tell Archy's nothing and will keep on working that way
Sorry you lost a good spot Paul
SS
Robert.
but not the siteshaun7 said:robfinds said:not a lot of people know this, but if the land owner does not want you to declare the find site , you don't have to. Gold silver or other wise, this is hidden in the small print of the law.Silver Searcher said:So you recorded the finds and they stopped you from detectingI find that amazing, and down right frustrating. was the field that produced these finds ploughed land
if it was there is no reason to stop detecting it, the finds are already out of context by ways of the farming activities. This one of the reasons I tell Archy's nothing and will keep on working that way
Sorry you lost a good spot Paul
SS
Robert.
But you still have to declare the find?
robfinds said:but not the siteshaun7 said:robfinds said:not a lot of people know this, but if the land owner does not want you to declare the find site , you don't have to. Gold silver or other wise, this is hidden in the small print of the law.Silver Searcher said:So you recorded the finds and they stopped you from detectingI find that amazing, and down right frustrating. was the field that produced these finds ploughed land
if it was there is no reason to stop detecting it, the finds are already out of context by ways of the farming activities. This one of the reasons I tell Archy's nothing and will keep on working that way
Sorry you lost a good spot Paul
SS
Robert.
But you still have to declare the find?
