I think I can help

[Greg Lafla]

Your discouragement stickys are far too tactful, and are going over the head of us that lack it. Please make it clear that you would only like to see pics of things like what we already have in our frames so we can constantly rehash what we already understand.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Agony and Death on a Gold Rush Steamer: The Disastrous Sinking of the Side-Wheeler Yankee Blade - Grab it through Amazon!

[jmaschal]

We would just like to see Native American artifacts hence the name of the forum.

 

[releventchair]

Human worked lithic artifacts/relics rock!

 

[Greg Lafla]

Things with which to compare value to my own?

 

[jmaschal]

Hey bud I hear the Geofact Forum is the place to be. Since most of your posts end there maybe should start there.

 

[Greg Lafla]

We all know no one reads that. I started researching bone tools. Took about ten minutes and I'm on a site report from Ontario. Cool stuff that everyone knows about. At the bottom in the we don't get it section it says "bone apparently cut with metal objects". Too lazy to go back and check. Shouldn't the stuff we don't get be at the top.

 

[jmaschal]

Look Greg not trying be a jerk or anything but there is no evidence what u are showing is worked by man. Just because something has a cool shape or fits in hand doesn’t open the door to new archeological thought. Now if something out of the ordinary showed human manufacturing than yes absolutely that should be challenged and debated. But arguing a rock stands up a certain way or fits in hand it’s elementary. Sure all rocks could have been used as a camp rock or quick hammering but that’s about it. I have plenty of rocks that were just out of place and probably used for something but what advancement is that? It’s a pretty wide notion NA’s used what’s available. Look I truly encourage you to continue your hunts and present questions but have some type of logical support. You are strictly posting rocks and saying essentially it could be something. Ok that’s about all the answers you are ever going to get and you probably will not get much enjoyment from this site. But if you find something altered by man and have questions about time periods or tool types this is a forum you can learn from. Right now you are just coming across as someone that is trying to create your own theories and not listening to the years of experience from experts on this site. I will no longer add my two cents to your posts. Best of luck.

 

[justonemore]

Couldn't say it better than jmaschal.
You have choices. Having picked your path and disregarding everything everybody has told you doesn't speak of us but about your disregard for what is and those here who have put up with. If we don't fit your mold, please move on to a site that does. Believe it or not they exist.

 

[Kray Gelder]

Here's what I think. I don't believe you are at all interested in artifacts, or in learning about them. This is your chosen type of entertainment, as a contrarian. Your posts prove this. As stated earlier, you get more comments than legitimate finds, so why change, right? This is what you do. I suspect you haunt other forums doing exactly the same thing. When you post an ordinary rock, you know it is ordinary. You seek conflict. You mentioned your son, are you teaching him this annoying pastime?

 

[Diggin-N-Dumps]

Here's what I think. I don't believe you are at all interested in artifacts, or in learning about them. This is your chosen type of entertainment, as a contrarian. Your posts prove this. As stated earlier, you get more comments than legitimate finds, so why change, right? This is what you do. I suspect you haunt other forums doing exactly the same thing. When you post an ordinary rock, you know it is ordinary. You seek conflict. You mentioned your son, are you teaching him this annoying pastime?

Trollolololol