I hear a different response with every frequency used for the same object.
Your not getting high enough EMI. Usually the higher the frequency the less interference from it. At 18 like I said previously,I still can't get 50-60 yds from neighborhood power lines. Not big ones either and after a rain it's worse.
Next time out if there's any around. Walk under and see with both coils what response you get if you have time.
Most homes long gone here I can't get close to do to that reason. The roads were here for few hundred years. Utilities run right over or in front of most keeping me at bay.
Yes, in full tones, the tone breaks go up with frequency (if ID NORM is off), but you asked what the difference in sound was when you were running the HF at approximately the same frequency as the LF coil, in full tones there is practically no difference between 12 khz and and 13/14 khz as far as I can tell, that is what I thought you were asking. On the LF coil you are going to see an appreciable change in Target ID from 4khz to 8 khz to 12 khz to 18 khz. The change in target ID and full tones tone becomes less as you increment from one frequency to another at the higher tones. Of course the tone breaks and target ID's go up as expected if you run at 28.8, 56, and 74 khz (the nominal HF frequencies) but since everything is getting jammed up at the high end at that point, what you are really losing is resolution (e.g., the ability to readily tell a penny from half-dollar). And there is no ID NORM on the HF coils.
I am not getting high enough EMI

Uh, OK. Sounds pretty bad to me on the LF coil, and not as bad on the HF coil at around the same frequency when I am under those power lines. You are assuming the coil shielding and other parameters are exactly the same between the LF and HF coils, they are not. The EMI resilience is not just a function of the frequency of the coil you are running but also how the coil is made, the windings and shielding used. The HF coils just seem to be made to be more EMI resilient and stable. Don't know what they changed, but they changed something and it is not just a function of the frequency they run at.
Also, with the Deus people assume all noise is EMI. Not necessarily true. EMI susceptibility for the Deus must have been a real nightmare for the XP engineers. Unlike most detectors, the XP is susceptible to EMI via it's wireless radio system received by at least three RF receiver/transmitters (in the coil (but not the coil windings themselves), the control box, and the headphones). This EMI is mitigated by the XP noise reduction initialization when you first turn the machine on and have the coil raised in the air - typical sources are WIFI, microwaves, fluorescent lighting, power lines, and other detectors. The second is EMI interference received through the detector coil windings, this is traditionally what all detectors the most EMI because this is your other big "antenna" since you are transmitting RF energy into the ground and receiving it back. This is the primary point where EMI from power lines and nearby detectors are likely to become audible. Some of the other sources can get into the Deus via this path too. The nature how this EMI enters the detector (through the coil windings) is the reason why frequency shifting or wholesale frequency changing often helps. When talking proximity to sources, since high frequency sources are both typically low powered and because high frequencies are attenuated more in the air vs. lower frequencies, operating the Deus at a higher frequency often makes the Deus more quiet, but not always. A nearby, high powered source that just happens to be at 28 khz or that is a broadband transmitter (electric dog fence) for example can ruin your ability to hear at any frequency. In that case you either have to throw in the towel or resort to drastic DEUS settings that severely limit detection depth (silencer, disc, ground notch) or the types of targets you can hear (notching up to high conductors).
Gary also mentions ground balancing. This is not EMI per se, but ground noise is annoying and can be mitigated by properly GB your detector, biasing the GB high if necessary (but you lose sensitivity and depth) and by cutting in ground notch and/or silencer. The other thing Gary mentions is noise which occurs when the coil bangs against a ground object. That is called microphonics and all sensitive detection circuits are susceptible to it. It is caused when minor arcing or other rapid current fluctuations occur due the shock event which may partially disconnect loose connections within the coil or between the coil and the power source. I have noticed that the HF coils are more susceptible to this perhaps due to their operating frequency and also because the battery is connectorized and resides in the stem shaft. Raising GB setting may alleviate this somewhat, but I think this is mainly due to the fact that you are lowering sensitivity. Not sure.
HTH.