- Joined
- Jun 3, 2007
- Messages
- 1,229
- Reaction score
- 2,110
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Sebastian, Florida
- Detector(s) used
- A sharp eye, an AquaPulse and a finely tuned shrimp fork.
- Primary Interest:
- Shipwrecks
I realize I may be assisting in a thread-jacking, but here goes...
Beach re-nourishment.
More like beachfront business owners subsidy.I have a long rant stored up about this, but I will spare you all the pain of reading about sediment transport and other arcane subject matter.
I do have a question that Dom and/or others may be able to answer: When the mess that they pile on top of the real beach sand erodes under big surf conditions, does it settle back out in the reef area or does it get washed back to the muck pile from whence it came?
If it is covering the reef/ledge it would seem that the re-nourishment projects are doing damage to the habitat of many kinds of assorted sea life as well as reducing the fishing opportunities for all those out-of-state fishermen that fuel the tourism industry. There might be a good argument against projects like this.
Thanks for any additional discussion.

Beach re-nourishment.
More like beachfront business owners subsidy.I have a long rant stored up about this, but I will spare you all the pain of reading about sediment transport and other arcane subject matter.
I do have a question that Dom and/or others may be able to answer: When the mess that they pile on top of the real beach sand erodes under big surf conditions, does it settle back out in the reef area or does it get washed back to the muck pile from whence it came?
If it is covering the reef/ledge it would seem that the re-nourishment projects are doing damage to the habitat of many kinds of assorted sea life as well as reducing the fishing opportunities for all those out-of-state fishermen that fuel the tourism industry. There might be a good argument against projects like this.
Thanks for any additional discussion.
