Just Blocked Fisher Labs on Facebook... I dont need "downblouse" photos showing up!

[masterjedi]

If I had this picture on my facebook page and some random follower asked me to taken it down, he/she wouldn't have a chance to unfollow or block my page. I bet Fisher was laughing their butt's off at the request/requester.

I saved this to my desktop she is so pretty !

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

How to Research for Treasure Hunting and Metal Detecting From Lead Generation to Vetting - Grab it through Amazon!

[masterjedi]

OK All...

I see a lot of responses here based on the fact that I somehow *tongue in cheek* believe I am being scarred for life by seeing the photo of Elena on Fisher Labs page. That's not what this is about. It's about receiving Wall updates of photos that are questionable in their purpose, and modesty.

Simply put... my standards of what is "appropriate" are different from many of yours. I get that. What I choose to allow into my digital life is different than yours, too. I get that.

I felt it was NOT appropriate to have involuntarily received pictures of what I personally consider immodesty on MY Facebook wall. There was no purpose to it, and if you look at the comments section of the pictures, I'm clearly not alone in that opinion. I had thoroughly enjoyed the pictures of the "finds," before that. But when "Fisher Labs" name is slathered all over the photo, and it was showing up on my wall in a way that I was uncomfortable with... I expressed myself to the company. I also expressed myself here. When they failed to take action to keep immodest photos off my FB wall, I dropped them, blocked them, and am choosing to not buy their products. The same way I've never eaten at Carl's Jr. since the commercial with Paris Hilton. Or the resturaunts where I got bad service... or Target when they failed to protect my credit card #'s... I vote with my billfold, and am ok sharing that with folks.

There is NO ulterior motive to this thread. I'm not trying to get you to stop buying Fisher Labs. I simply had a rant... I posted it... and now I'm getting all kinds of fun replies. Some of them CLEARLY have motives of their own.

This'll probably be the last serious post I make here. I need to get back to looking at Today's finds... which is what I wanted to do all along!

You may not want to be looking at Facebook at work... just saying..

 

[masterjedi]

You guys should see what my girl digs in some times.

Heh !

AARC... I wish....

 

[jeff of pa]

Skippy... we all have a right to our opinions.
You do not like pretty girls that show any skin?? Crazy

Fisher... really... you went to the 1/2 of 1 % of the population that does not like pretty women, and deleted the thread? Bad move.
Most of the population did not have their head in the gutter and truly appreciate beautiful metal detectorists.
Its a truly lucky person that gets to dig with her.
Fisher... lets see if your smart enough to put the pictures back up? You will sell so many more detectors than worrying about the 1/2 of 1% of the people that have their heads in the gutters.
Gary from Oregon

I can think of a couple reasons it was removed.
Perhaps the lady in the Picture was getting attacks & More.

Or perhaps everyone was trying to Out Do her with their own pics
making the thread a joke.

I don't know how Facebook works, But those would be 2 reasons I'd remove the thread.

the pic isn't pornographic by any sense of the word.
but I imagine there are some real hounds in the workplace
walking around sneaking peaks at computer screens just to
have an excuse to jump all over things.

 

[fistfulladirt]

There are things out there that offend me too. Facebook is one of them.

 

[jeff of pa]

There are things out there that offend me too. Facebook is one of them.

absolutely !

a Pedophiles & en-trappers Dream come True.

I'm not saying everyone on Facebook is Potential Scum of the earth.

But I don't play well around them.

 

[ARC]

Hmmmm.....

I think this calls for a posting by me on my Random picture thread... of some scantily clad hotties.

So if any of you are curious... :P

 

[Oddjob]

You guys should see what my girl digs in some times.

Heh !

Well go on then, show us.

Just not in this thread or someone may loose their job or get embarrassed in front of their wife.

http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/discoveries/441445-cute-girls-metal-detectors.html

 

[ARC]

Ok... she said yes...
But she doesn't want her face shown... lol.

:/

Treasure Hunter and Col Dan have both seen her detecting awhile ago.

 

[Oddjob]

Ok... she said yes...
But she doesn't want her face shown... lol.

:/

Treasure Hunter and Col Dan have both seen her detecting awhile ago.

But seriously, pretty women MDing looks better than men MDing. I mean I am 6'6" at 300 pounds, I have not shaved in years, I work out 4 hours a day and have scares all over from 31 years of combined service with the Army & Interpol of 64 countries with tons of fun and many bad days. Plus I carry my issued sidearm always.

I do not even want to see me. A picture of me next to a picture of any women MDing on the beach and we all know who is going to win that vote.

 

[diggummup]

Much ado about nothing.... literally. What a joke.

 

[Oddjob]

Much ado about nothing.... literally. What a joke.

Wish I could like this about 50 times.

 

[jeff of pa]

I find it hard to Believe she wears a White T like that to detect.
I know if I wore something that clean & White, it would be trash after the first hour.

unless she's got clean dirt there, Or detects but Doesn't personally retrieve.
My guess She prettied herself up for the Photo shoot.

Nothing wrong with that.

Reminds me of some of the Old Whites adds on the Covers of Mags



Where is her Digger & Where does she stick her Finds ?

 

[SeabeeRon]

Skippy... we all have a right to our opinions.
You do not like pretty girls that show any skin?? Crazy

Fisher... really... you went to the 1/2 of 1 % of the population that does not like pretty women, and deleted the thread? Bad move.
Most of the population did not have their head in the gutter and truly appreciate beautiful metal detectorists.
Its a truly lucky person that gets to dig with her.

Fisher... lets see if your smart enough to put the pictures back up? You will sell so many more detectors than worrying about the 1/2 of 1% of the people that have their heads in the gutters.

Gary from Oregon

??!? The pictures are still there (or have been put back up).

 

[G.I.B.]

Disgusting...



Horrible



Ewww- my EYES



Ahhh- Here we are. Very tasteful.




Ok, this is better. Oh yeah~

 

[Icewing]

Dang Skippy, I've seen school teachers with more exposed cleavage.
That's not a "down blouse", it's just a picture of a woman, let's move on.

 

[GA_Boy]

There are things out there that offend me too. Facebook is one of them.

Tell it like it is, especially used by people using at work wasting the Company's profits. If I were not retired and found one of my employees doing this not work related, they would get one and only one warning, then it's bye,bye company and hello soup line.
Marvin

 

[BARKER]

Hi; There is no way they were even allowed to be as naked as they are today. That picture of the woman washing the car shows her wearing a bikini and her hair is covering her breasts. That was done "intentionally" to shield the Public from unwanted views. Heck, Elvis was censored on the Ed Sullivan show for his "gyrations". He was forced to go back on the show to perform "Hound Dog" and not allowed to dance at all.
The camera's showed only his head. Then it was considered a DIRECT provocation when he ran his fingers through his hair during the performance. He never appeared on the Ed Sullivan show again. Think about it. About WoodStock. What do you expect from a bunch of stoned hippies. LSD would do that to you. No wonder they went nude. PEACE:RONB

 

[Nitric]

Hi; There is no way they were even allowed to be as naked as they are today. That picture of the woman washing the car shows her wearing a bikini and her hair is covering her breasts. That was done "intentionally" to shield the Public from unwanted views. Heck, Elvis was censored on the Ed Sullivan show for his "gyrations". He was forced to go back on the show to perform "Hound Dog" and not allowed to dance at all.
The camera's showed only his head. Then it was considered a DIRECT provocation when he ran his fingers through his hair during the performance. He never appeared on the Ed Sullivan show again. Think about it. About WoodStock. What do you expect from a bunch of stoned hippies. LSD would do that to you. No wonder they went nude. PEACE:RONB

Ok I see your point about woodstock!

The picture on the facebook page is no worse than ads from the 60's and 70's. That what I was getting at. Hey, I agree with you guys on the idea that sex sells. But, I don't believe in the scheme of things it's much different today? Whatever provoked the thought in the 20's, is different, but it might take more today to provoke that same thought? If I would have went through that page I would not have even looked twice, I would have not even thought anything of it. Where the older generations see it differently.

 

[BARKER]

Hi Nitric; You know your getting old when you start getting High on Geritol.!!! PEACE:RONB