Man-made or natural....two objects to ponder

gary s fl

Sr. Member
Mar 21, 2005
251
33
Birmingham Alabama
Detector(s) used
Equinox 800, CTX 3030, Explorer II, Excalibur, Aquasound, TDI, GB 2, Quick-triggered CZ-21, AU-21, G2, Comprade 7" & 5.5"
Primary Interest:
Other
Found these two objects while beach combing but at least 1000 miles apart. The larger V-shape item appears to be a rock similar to quartz or granite. Weighs a hair under 3 oz. Measures 1-13/16” x 1-11/16”. The wider top side has what appears to be grooves cut into it. It fits in the hand comfortably with the V side up. Could it have been made for hand grinding? Don’t know, but it could have been, even if it was naturally shaped.

The other object with the three holes appears to be a piece of sun-bleached fossilized bone. The beach where it was found consistently washes up fossilized bone that is similar in appearance except usually much darker. All the holes appear bored and evenly circular. The two on one side are very close in diameter and appear in-line. None of the holes are very deep. If it was man-made, it could be that the object was larger at one time and wave action reduced the size of it. If that’s the case, the holes would have been longer at one point. Weighs .7 oz or 19.9 g. Measures 1-11/16” x 1”. If the holes were man-made, why, and what could it have been used for? Anyways, just wanted some input from the pros here. Thanks for looking
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8053.JPG
    IMG_8053.JPG
    196 KB · Views: 57
  • IMG_8059.JPG
    IMG_8059.JPG
    181.5 KB · Views: 51
  • IMG_8056.JPG
    IMG_8056.JPG
    156.2 KB · Views: 50
  • IMG_8098.JPG
    IMG_8098.JPG
    227 KB · Views: 50
  • IMG_8095.JPG
    IMG_8095.JPG
    208.9 KB · Views: 41
  • IMG_8094.JPG
    IMG_8094.JPG
    207 KB · Views: 50
  • IMG_8083.JPG
    IMG_8083.JPG
    300.7 KB · Views: 50
  • IMG_8054.JPG
    IMG_8054.JPG
    143.6 KB · Views: 51

Charlie P. (NY)

Gold Member
Feb 3, 2006
13,004
17,108
South Central Upstate NY in the foothills of the h
Detector(s) used
Minelab Musketeer Advantage Pro w/8" & 10" DD coils/Fisher F75se(Upgraded to LTD2) w/11" DD, 6.5" concentric & 9.5" NEL Sharpshooter DD coils/Sunray FX-1 Probe & F-Point/Black Widows/Rattler headphone
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Your first object may be a mineralized/fossilized horn coral. They loose detail after rolling around in the surf if exposed to it.

horncoral.jpg

The second may be human work on bone, or may be boring marine worm damage on bone. They mike nice round holes in shell and bone. Nothing organic goes to waste in the ocean.
 

Upvote 0
OP
OP
gary s fl

gary s fl

Sr. Member
Mar 21, 2005
251
33
Birmingham Alabama
Detector(s) used
Equinox 800, CTX 3030, Explorer II, Excalibur, Aquasound, TDI, GB 2, Quick-triggered CZ-21, AU-21, G2, Comprade 7" & 5.5"
Primary Interest:
Other
Charlie, thanks for the input. I agree on the second object. Even though the holes are in-line they well could be natural. As for the first object, I highly doubt it's made of coral at least not the coral I've handled. It's just too heavy for it's mass and most certainly is made of stone.....though as my wife often reminds me, I'm not always right. Anyways, I like your profile saying.
 

Upvote 0

Charlie P. (NY)

Gold Member
Feb 3, 2006
13,004
17,108
South Central Upstate NY in the foothills of the h
Detector(s) used
Minelab Musketeer Advantage Pro w/8" & 10" DD coils/Fisher F75se(Upgraded to LTD2) w/11" DD, 6.5" concentric & 9.5" NEL Sharpshooter DD coils/Sunray FX-1 Probe & F-Point/Black Widows/Rattler headphone
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Fossilized coral is rock (by definition). Horn corals are heavy little jobbers.
 

Upvote 0
OP
OP
gary s fl

gary s fl

Sr. Member
Mar 21, 2005
251
33
Birmingham Alabama
Detector(s) used
Equinox 800, CTX 3030, Explorer II, Excalibur, Aquasound, TDI, GB 2, Quick-triggered CZ-21, AU-21, G2, Comprade 7" & 5.5"
Primary Interest:
Other
Your right, hadn't consider that fossilized coral is indeed rock, though, even if it is fossilized coral, some natural process or someone chieseled the opening at the top. I guess?
 

Upvote 0

unclemac

Gold Member
Oct 12, 2011
7,025
6,926
Primary Interest:
Beach & Shallow Water Hunting
in any case neither are man made or tools of any sort.
 

Upvote 0
OP
OP
gary s fl

gary s fl

Sr. Member
Mar 21, 2005
251
33
Birmingham Alabama
Detector(s) used
Equinox 800, CTX 3030, Explorer II, Excalibur, Aquasound, TDI, GB 2, Quick-triggered CZ-21, AU-21, G2, Comprade 7" & 5.5"
Primary Interest:
Other
My error in wording but I didn't ask if it was a tool. My enquiry was meant to ask whether or not either object was altered by man for some use. You seem sure neither were without explaining why? I'm not so sure. If the V-shaped object is indeed fossilized coral then I agree with Charlie's reply.
 

Upvote 0

unclemac

Gold Member
Oct 12, 2011
7,025
6,926
Primary Interest:
Beach & Shallow Water Hunting
mostly due to experience and the fact that they serve no purpose
 

Upvote 0
OP
OP
gary s fl

gary s fl

Sr. Member
Mar 21, 2005
251
33
Birmingham Alabama
Detector(s) used
Equinox 800, CTX 3030, Explorer II, Excalibur, Aquasound, TDI, GB 2, Quick-triggered CZ-21, AU-21, G2, Comprade 7" & 5.5"
Primary Interest:
Other
No purpose? The V shaped object could easily have been used to grind substances. Thanks for input.
 

Upvote 0

unclemac

Gold Member
Oct 12, 2011
7,025
6,926
Primary Interest:
Beach & Shallow Water Hunting
no, too small, no signs of use wear, no purpose....grind what? again, not a tool
 

Upvote 0

ANTIQUARIAN

Gold Member
Apr 24, 2010
12,841
27,385
Upper Canada 🇨🇦
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
3
Detector(s) used
XP Deus, Lesche Piranha 35 Shovel & 'Garrett Carrot'
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
Interesting finds Gary and great info provided by Charlie and Mac above. :thumbsup:
As a suggestion, for more theories you might want to repost your questions here... Geological Forums
Dave
 

Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top