hey palmetto it hit off at 72 and stayed solidPalmetto said:Holy cow!
Very nice.
I agree with CC Hunter-please look into how to best care for that beautiful relic. You may never get another of those.
Do you remember where that one hit on the VDI?
Palmetto
I have found some at a site I came across in the field.Not sure what was there but I have found as of now 30 hoop buttons,12 round lead shot balls,a 4 reale 1757,1/2 reale 1753,and one that I think is a 4 reale that has been cut in a 1/4 pie shape.It has a date of 17?I also found 2 copper'slonelyduckhunter said:Nice Find. Marylands Eastern shore has some very good history. I know I detect it all the time live here. Right before the 4 of July last year I dug a 1793 Chain cent from the shore. Grats on a Banner find and if you ever want to hook up and detect let me know. I go all the time. You find any reale's or old silver from the farm yet? I'm sure there are some there.![]()
Where is it posted that someone's first post isn't banner worthy, or rather you have to X amount of posts to make the banner? Please show me.DevilDog812 said:amazing find! unfortunately, i dont think it will get banner since it was your first post
under banner pics , show > banner finds > about banner , We often get asked about the criteria we use when selecting posts that appear in the TreasureNet masthead banner.... While we don't have any firm criteria, we follow these general guidelines...diggummup said:Where is it posted that someone's first post isn't banner worthy, or rather you have to X amount of posts to make the banner? Please show me.DevilDog812 said:amazing find! unfortunately, i dont think it will get banner since it was your first post![]()
Thanks CMDiamonddawg. I guess he should have came on and replied to 50 posts first with a "thumbs up" smiley. That would make him an official member huh?CMDiamonddawg said:under banner pics , show > banner finds > about banner , We often get asked about the criteria we use when selecting posts that appear in the TreasureNet masthead banner.... While we don't have any firm criteria, we follow these general guidelines...diggummup said:Where is it posted that someone's first post isn't banner worthy, or rather you have to X amount of posts to make the banner? Please show me.DevilDog812 said:amazing find! unfortunately, i dont think it will get banner since it was your first post![]()
Finds must be significant, and plausible.
Finds / posts must be RECENT.
Images must be hosted on the TreasureNet server.
Posts with great stories are more likely to be selected.
If the post is one of the members first posts, it is less likely to be selected.
Finds must look good in the banner. that was set up long ago , diggumup ... Too many one time posters , showboating their Best
50 thumbs up smiliesdiggummup said:Thanks CMDiamonddawg. I guess he should have came on and replied to 50 posts first with a "thumbs up" smiley. That would make him an official member huh?CMDiamonddawg said:under banner pics , show > banner finds > about banner , We often get asked about the criteria we use when selecting posts that appear in the TreasureNet masthead banner.... While we don't have any firm criteria, we follow these general guidelines...diggummup said:Where is it posted that someone's first post isn't banner worthy, or rather you have to X amount of posts to make the banner? Please show me.DevilDog812 said:amazing find! unfortunately, i dont think it will get banner since it was your first post![]()
Finds must be significant, and plausible.
Finds / posts must be RECENT.
Images must be hosted on the TreasureNet server.
Posts with great stories are more likely to be selected.
If the post is one of the members first posts, it is less likely to be selected.
Finds must look good in the banner. that was set up long ago , diggumup ... Too many one time posters , showboating their BestMaybe if he was a charter member, that would have changed things too?
Maybe if he sticks around long enough to show his "worthiness" to Tnet, we can then ressurect this thread and get it on the banner?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()