My Movie

[aarthrj3811]

Not wrong, and certainly not dead wrong. You've been outed and one-upped by your own words. Live with it and simply move on

Hey Eddie….Same old stuff….They will try to Spin and twist every thing and blame it on us because they don’t understand the English language…Art

 

[EddieR]

Not wrong, and certainly not dead wrong. You've been outed and one-upped by your own words. Live with it and simply move on

Hey Eddie….Same old stuff….They will try to Spin and twist every thing and blame it on us because they don’t understand the English language…Art

Naw Art....we're just having fun.

 

[EddieR]

Actually, if ya just gotta know...my staff and I are placing bets on your responses to the posts....thanks for the fifteen bucks! LOL

Played like a gee-tar.

:::waves Howdy to the "staff" @ Fox's::::

 

[Saturna]

Hey Eddie….Same old stuff….They will try to Spin and twist every thing and blame it on us because they don’t understand the English language…Art

I'm glad to see you're trying new expressions, Art ... I got tired of seeing 'twist and spin' in every second post of yours.

 

[Ted Groves]

Where did I say I didn't want to learn or understand?

Well, here is one example:

Nope. I don't care what's inside it. But just for the record, I've never opened up any of my detectors either.

Rather than play your game, I'll say right now your didn't say "learn or understand". However, "I don't care what's inside it" translates to a closed minded person with absolutely no investigative moxie.

Word.

Isn't it interesting that the first time a believer actually provides proof, it's proof against their own claims?

I know Eddie's pattern. It's an old lawyers trick, known as "Duh em up". Works as good as the everlasting cigar ash trick.

Actually, if ya just gotta know...my staff and I are placing bets on your responses to the posts....thanks for the fifteen bucks! LOL

Played like a gee-tar.

Your C, F and G7 ....are getting a little old though.

You need to broaden your repertoire and learn how to incorporate a Gm7, a Ddim and a Aaug9

How did your g'ma know to look for copper, and what did she do to make sure she only found copper? Did she use an MFD transmitter for discrimination? According to the LRL/MFD aficionados, that's the only way to keep the rods from pulling to anything and everything. Now you're telling us she did it with a bare set of rods. Could it be those MFD black boxes aren't really necessary after all?

 

[EddieR]

Where did I say I didn't want to learn or understand?

Well, here is one example:

Nope. I don't care what's inside it. But just for the record, I've never opened up any of my detectors either.

Rather than play your game, I'll say right now your didn't say "learn or understand". However, "I don't care what's inside it" translates to a closed minded person with absolutely no investigative moxie.

Word.

Isn't it interesting that the first time a believer actually provides proof, it's proof against their own claims?

I know Eddie's pattern. It's an old lawyers trick, known as "Duh em up". Works as good as the everlasting cigar ash trick.

Actually, if ya just gotta know...my staff and I are placing bets on your responses to the posts....thanks for the fifteen bucks! LOL

Played like a gee-tar.

Your C, F and G7 ....are getting a little old though.

You need to broaden your repertoire and learn how to incorporate a Gm7, a Ddim and a Aaug9

How did your g'ma know to look for copper, and what did she do to make sure she only found copper? Did she use an MFD transmitter for discrimination? According to the LRL/MFD aficionados, that's the only way to keep the rods from pulling to anything and everything. Now you're telling us she did it with a bare set of rods. Could it be those MFD black boxes aren't really necessary after all?

The book (it was a diary) described the still being made of copper. I dunno about the discrimination part. And yep, it was just brass rods.

 

[Ted Groves]

The book (it was a diary) described the still being made of copper. I dunno about the discrimination part. And yep, it was just brass rods.

No, what I meant was; how did she keep the rods from pulling to water or tree moss or the silverware in the house, or the neighbors house. In other words what did she do to keep the rods from indicating everything else except copper? Also, she must have walked under or near overhead (or underground) copper wires; how come the rods didn't pull to these items?

If you come back with "I don't know" ..... well, that's what WE mean by looking at it closer. You haven't looked at it close enough yet, still you are willing to come on here and tell us how you "believe" in it working, and infer that WE should not be questioning this strange "power" because you've seen it "work".

Look at it closer, Eddie, then when you can answer some of our questions with more than "I don't know" you will begin to "pull the curtain and see the Wizard who is operating the controls".

 

[EddieR]

The book (it was a diary) described the still being made of copper. I dunno about the discrimination part. And yep, it was just brass rods.

No, what I meant was; how did she keep the rods from pulling to water or tree moss or the silverware in the house, or the neighbors house. In other words what did she do to keep the rods from indicating everything else except copper? Also, she must have walked under or near overhead (or underground) copper wires; how come the rods didn't pull to these items?

If you come back with "I don't know" ..... well, that's what WE mean by looking at it closer. You haven't looked at it close enough yet, still you are willing to come on here and tell us how you "believe" in it working, and infer that WE should not be questioning this strange "power" because you've seen it "work".

Look at it closer, Eddie, then when you can answer some of our questions with more than "I don't know" you will begin to "pull the curtain and see the Wizard who is operating the controls".

As far as the rods not getting water, I don't know for certain that there is water there. There are no visual indicators to show it (creeks, springs, etc.).

Now the copper wire part is easy (as is the silverware). This is East Tennessee. We are not boxed in by houses 3 feet away on either side of us. My grandparents have well water, city water doesn't run out that far in the country. The property they bought is just fields and woods, there are no houses around, and power lines do not cross the property (at this time, anyway).

I'm not sure about the moss thing either....

 

[aarthrj3811]

It seems that all you want to talk about is Dowsing. They last few posts post tell us you know less about dowsing than you do LRL’s. This post is about movies using LRL’s and MFD’s. I know the last few weeks has been bad for you and you are struggling to find ways to hide your lack of knowledge but please talk about something that pertains to the subject…Art

 

[Ted Groves]

As far as the rods not getting water, I don't know for certain that there is water there. There are no visual indicators to show it (creeks, springs, etc.).

Now the copper wire part is easy (as is the silverware). This is East Tennessee. We are not boxed in by houses 3 feet away on either side of us. My grandparents have well water, city water doesn't run out that far in the country. The property they bought is just fields and woods, there are no houses around, and power lines do not cross the property (at this time, anyway).

I'm not sure about the moss thing either....

Well, even in East TN, there must be some other folks that may have silverware (or stashed gold), other sources of water and certainly there would be other copper products somewhere outside the confines of your grandparents' land borders.

For one thing, the house they live in no doubt has copper wiring in it. Also, the vehicles on the property all contain a certain amount of copper wiring. How many vehicles were on the property at the time?

So, you see, now we have a separate issue; that being one of "distance" (proximity) as well as "element discrimination".

How do you suppose it was that your grandmother (armed only with a pair of brass rods) only allowed the rods to react to the copper on her land that was a part of the sought after still? And I would still like to know how she "tuned" the rods to only react to the buried copper?

 

[EddieR]

As far as the rods not getting water, I don't know for certain that there is water there. There are no visual indicators to show it (creeks, springs, etc.).

Now the copper wire part is easy (as is the silverware). This is East Tennessee. We are not boxed in by houses 3 feet away on either side of us. My grandparents have well water, city water doesn't run out that far in the country. The property they bought is just fields and woods, there are no houses around, and power lines do not cross the property (at this time, anyway).

I'm not sure about the moss thing either....

Well, even in East TN, there must be some other folks that may have silverware (or stashed gold), other sources of water and certainly there would be other copper products somewhere outside the confines of your grandparents' land borders.

For one thing, the house they live in no doubt has copper wiring in it. Also, the vehicles on the property all contain a certain amount of copper wiring. How many vehicles were on the property at the time?

So, you see, now we have a separate issue; that being one of "distance" (proximity) as well as "element discrimination".

How do you suppose it was that your grandmother (armed only with a pair of brass rods) only allowed the rods to react to the copper on her land that was a part of the sought after still? And I would still like to know how she "tuned" the rods to only react to the buried copper?

The closest house is theirs and it is 3 miles away from where the still was found. There were no vehicles around, we were on foot.

I don't have the answers about the "discrimination" of the rods.

 

[aarthrj3811]

What a bunch of BS…You guys have been around T-Net for ten years asking stupid questions. The words “Copper Rods” tell the whole story. You guys know that and yet you post and post as if you did not know the facts. When you guys get in Panic Mode you guys make less sense every day….Art

 

[Ted Groves]

The closest house is theirs and it is 3 miles away from where the still was found. There were no vehicles around, we were on foot.

I don't have the answers about the "discrimination" of the rods.

So there were no vehicles at their house when the search took place; indicating that you all arrived on the premises by parachute, helicopter, teleporting or walked in.

(I could go on like this for days, as I'm sure you could too, but to what end? (rhetorical))

The point is, you seem not to be willing to consider any other explanation for the find other than the one you like to support. As long as you are content with buying in on an illusion rather than looking more closely at the real logical reasons for the find; I see little benefit for continued dialog.

Just out of curiosity, was it your MO as counsel to take only those cases where a "gullible" or "technically-challenged" was involved, and to do it pro bono?

 

[Ted Groves]

I seemed to have lost my program. Was G'Ma also the one who dowsed graves?

Perhaps. Let me check... Act 4, Scene 3; G'ma enters stage left holding a pair of brass brazing rods. I think it was her.

 

[EddieR]

I seemed to have lost my program. Was G'Ma also the one who dowsed graves?

Yes.

 

[EddieR]

The closest house is theirs and it is 3 miles away from where the still was found. There were no vehicles around, we were on foot.

I don't have the answers about the "discrimination" of the rods.

So there were no vehicles at their house when the search took place; indicating that you all arrived on the premises by parachute, helicopter, teleporting or walked in.

(I could go on like this for days, as I'm sure you could too, but to what end? (rhetorical))

The point is, you seem not to be willing to consider any other explanation for the find other than the one you like to support. As long as you are content with buying in on an illusion rather than looking more closely at the real logical reasons for the find; I see little benefit for continued dialog.

Just out of curiosity, was it your MO as counsel to take only those cases where a "gullible" or "technically-challenged" was involved, and to do it pro bono?

Oh yeah like you're willing to say that the find was something other than illusion? The whole "illusion" thing to me sounds like what we used to call a "scrape-out"....you use any explanation other than the one you are fighting against in order to scrape out and move on.

I know you consider dowsing and LRL's to be hooey, and that's okay, as everybody has an opinion.

 

[Ted Groves]

Oh yeah like you're willing to say that the find was something other than illusion? The whole "illusion" thing to me sounds like what we used to call a "scrape-out"....you use any explanation other than the one you are fighting against in order to scrape out and move on.

I know you consider dowsing and LRL's to be hooey, and that's okay, as everybody has an opinion.

scrape-out

My opinion just happens to be supported by rational science and past testing experiences. I've already looked at LRL/MFD (dowsing) and investigated it at some length in order to form my conclusions. Something you apparently don't have the gonads to do. That's cool... you aren't the only one who has been confounded by the ideomotor effect, and you won't be the last. Keep your blinders on; your belief system will remain blissfully intact that way.

 

[EddieR]

Oh yeah like you're willing to say that the find was something other than illusion? The whole "illusion" thing to me sounds like what we used to call a "scrape-out"....you use any explanation other than the one you are fighting against in order to scrape out and move on.

I know you consider dowsing and LRL's to be hooey, and that's okay, as everybody has an opinion.

scrape-out

My opinion just happens to be supported by rational science and past testing experiences. I've already looked at LRL/MFD (dowsing) and investigated it at some length in order to form my conclusions. Something you apparently don't have the gonads to do. That's cool... you aren't the only one who has been confounded by the ideomotor effect, and you won't be the last. Keep your blinders on; your belief system will remain blissfully intact that way.

Okay.

 

[aarthrj3811]

My opinion just happens to be supported by rational science and past testing experiences. I've already looked at LRL/MFD (dowsing) and investigated it at some length in order to form my conclusions. Something you apparently don't have the gonads to do. That's cool... you aren't the only one who has been confounded by the ideomotor effect, and you won't be the last. Keep your blinders on; your belief system will remain blissfully intact that way.

Sounds good Sam….Just like the Cult leader tells you to say….Great job….You may have even gotten a Merit Badge for your role in the GREAT T-NET SCAM OF 2010….It is to bad that we caught on to this SCAM. …ART

 

[aarthrj3811]

You Scammer sure think you have good eyes…It is hard to believe when you guys see the proof that you are wrong you start to panic and make a bunch of false comments. Did you not notice that every time the Examiner closed my left heel was right on a signal line that ran in one of the cardinal directions. In case you don’t know the Cardinal Directions are North-South-East and West. Did you not notice that when my heel was on the rock the Examiner did nothing. It closed when my heel was clearly off of the rock.
That means all of your panic mode false statements were indeed wrong. I know that when the real truth is presented the scammers are beaten….Art