New site?...with different clue versions?

[wrmickel1]

You cannot prove the Jesuits carved the stones, the only Jesuit symbol is the cross, and that is even a stretch

Wrong, every trail dot has a meaning. Even the total number of dots in the trail.

babymick1

 

[Al D]

Wrong, every trail dot has a meaning. Even the total number of dots in the trail.

babymick1

Ridiculous

 

[wrmickel1]

mick..put the cork back in the bottle..as usual i have no idea what you are talking about

So your saying Janie said her dad carved them. And you have evidence that Travis had a dremel tool in 1935

babymick1

 

[somehiker]

its definitely isn't the johnny steel map...the guy that has this showed it to tom a few years back

So what's the reason he hasn't shared, or allowed it to be shared with everyone ?
How do you know it's not the same guy who told Tom the "Johnny Steel" story ?
A "few years back" fits the timeline well, since that's when Tom said he heard the story.
Like I said...."layers".

 

[wrmickel1]

Ridiculous

Prove your statement, it’s Complexity is astonishing

Babymick1

 

[Al D]

Prove your statement, it’s Complexity is astonishing

Babymick1

You make a lot of claims with NO proof, I say this, for every claim you can prove, I can prove a completely different interpretation, lets see how much faith you put into your interpretations

 

[azdave35]

So what's the reason he hasn't shared, or allowed it to be shared with everyone ?
How do you know it's not the same guy who told Tom the "Johnny Steel" story ?
A "few years back" fits the timeline well, since that's when Tom said he heard the story.
Like I said...."layers".

i've actually known this guy for 30 years...he wont let me take a pic of the map but he showed it to me....it is a very crudely carved map..nothing like the artwork of the museum stone maps

 

[azdave35]

You make a lot of claims with NO proof, I say this, for every claim you can prove, I can prove a completely different interpretation, lets see how much faith you put into your interpretations

mick likes to sling mud just to see where it splatters

 

[somehiker]

i've actually known this guy for 30 years...he wont let me take a pic of the map but he showed it to me....it is a very crudely carved map..nothing like the artwork of the museum stone maps

He must believe it's genuine then.
Crude might mean done in a hurry and on-site.....but why just leave it out there in the open ?
Unless he intended for someone to come across it and "think" it was genuine.
If someone wanted to cast doubt on the stone map story, carving a few stones and scattering them about out there would be a good way to do so, don't you think ? None would lead to anything of value, of course.

 

[Carl995]

if the stone maps are not in the hand of the Jesuits--------->USELESS!

 

[wrmickel1]

You make a lot of claims with NO proof, I say this, for every claim you can prove, I can prove a completely different interpretation, lets see how much faith you put into your interpretations

Well alrighty then, First claim, The Rosery when a Priest recites from the beads it’s every other one. The one skipped is for the pointy hat Priest. A 12th century priest before America is even discovered some how is left in the supers for eternity in the 16th Century. Find the meanings to the skipped beads and you’ll find your Heart.



I’ve enclosed the Priest pic to back it up.

disprove it.

 

[azdave35]

He must believe it's genuine then.
Crude might mean done in a hurry and on-site.....but why just leave it out there in the open ?
Unless he intended for someone to come across it and "think" it was genuine.
If someone wanted to cast doubt on the stone map story, carving a few stones and scattering them about out there would be a good way to do so, don't you think ? None would lead to anything of value, of course.

he definitely thinks is genuine..i know he didn't plant it because he has never sought any attention....the only reason he showed it to tom is because they were friends

 

[wrmickel1]

if the stone maps are not in the hand of the Jesuits--------->USELESS!

Not So

babymick1

 

[Al D]

Well alrighty then, First claim, The Rosery when a Priest recites from the beads it’s every other one. The one skipped is for the pointy hat Priest. A 12th century priest before America is even discovered some how is left in the supers for eternity in the 16th Century. Find the meanings to the skipped beads and you’ll find your Heart.

View attachment 1737338

I’ve enclosed the Priest pic to back it up.

disprove it.

This is just your interpretation and you think your “proof” comes from my inability to disprove it, typical con man tactic.
and your photo sucks, cannot tell what it is supposed to be. If this is your idea of proof, we are done here.

 

[azdave35]

Well alrighty then, First claim, The Rosery when a Priest recites from the beads it’s every other one. The one skipped is for the pointy hat Priest. A 12th century priest before America is even discovered some how is left in the supers for eternity in the 16th Century. Find the meanings to the skipped beads and you’ll find your Heart.

View attachment 1737338

I’ve enclosed the Priest pic to back it up.

disprove it.

why is it that every time someone posts a pic of some figure they found its too fuzzy to make out?

 

[Carl995]

why is it that every time someone posts a pic of some figure they found its too fuzzy to make out?

Dave, i'll try to clear it up for you.......here we see the horse picture, to the right is a cross..
if you can't make it out, maybe you need glasses!

 

[azdave35]

Dave, i'll try to clear it up for you.......here we see the horse picture, to the right is a cross..
if you can't make it out, maybe you need glasses!

View attachment 1737342

ok..i see now..lol

 

[Carl995]

blown up 300 percent....looks like a game of thrones guy holding a stick?

 

[azdave35]

blown up 300 percent....looks like a game of thrones guy holding a stick?

View attachment 1737346

playing hockey?

 

[Carl995]

that's how GE looks when close up.......that's why the blurry pic.