Ok Skeptics, I will accept the challenge of $25K

[woof!]

Because you insist too much, I will accept to take the "Double blind test"

BUT

You have to pay the price: $10,000. in fee plus expenses IN ADVANCE. I you want that I move from where I'm just to play games with you in other state, you have to pay me $10,000. fee plus expenses (fly ticket, hotels, car rental, gas, food, beer, cash to pay dancers in a bar "go-go") etc. Fail or win the contest, I don't care.


Resume:

$10,000. plus expense win or fail the contest.

Do you accept?

Arch

You charge $10K up front to see you lose? We already saw you lose and it didn't cost any of us a dime. But heck, if you want competition, I'll take the test for only $8K up front.

Anyone bid $6K?

--Toto

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Upgraded Night Vision Monocular Digital Infrared Monocular Telescope for 100% Darkness with 8X Zoom - Grab it through Amazon!

[architecad]

Because you insist too much, I will accept to take the "Double blind test"

BUT

You have to pay the price: $10,000. in fee plus expenses IN ADVANCE. I you want that I move from where I'm just to play games with you in other state, you have to pay me $10,000. fee plus expenses (fly ticket, hotels, car rental, gas, food, beer, cash to pay dancers in a bar "go-go") etc. Fail or win the contest, I don't care.


Resume:

$10,000. plus expense win or fail the contest.

Do you accept?

Arch

You charge $10K up front to see you lose? We already saw you lose and it didn't cost any of us a dime. But heck, if you want competition, I'll take the test for only $8K up front.

Anyone bid $6K?

--Toto

Because I'm a professional treasure hunter, big difference!!

We already saw you lose

it's a lie!! You never has saw me hunting.

10,000 up front, win or not, plus expense!!

Arch

 

[Carl-NC]

10,000 up front, win or not, plus expense!!

Arch, demanding $10,000 for failure tells me everything I need to know, and now everyone else knows it, too. I'm not a gullibilly, so I'll hold out for someone who thinks they can do the deed.

 

[woof!]

Doesn't matter any more anyhow, Carl, I underbid him by $2,000. When the money is awarded it goes to me, not Archie.

--Toto

 

[woof!]

I asked for a bid of $6K and didn't get one. Apparently even Art and Fenix know what Archie, Carl, and Toto know. That's arguably the funniest thing about the LRL-"MFD" business-- that everyone knows the same thing about it, other than perhaps a few folks who are new to the subject matter.

As I often say in regard to the things the LRL fans post, "we don't have to make that stuff up, it's their own words!"

--Toto

.

 

[architecad]

10,000 up front, win or not, plus expense!!

Arch, demanding $10,000 for failure tells me everything I need to know, and now everyone else knows it, too. I'm not a gullibilly, so I'll hold out for someone who thinks they can do the deed.

Carl

I was very clear with my propose. I said, "10K up front win or not." I didn't say, "10k for failure". Please, don't twist my statement.

Arch

 

[architecad]

People

This content won't change anything. I will keep finding treasures with a MFD like always. Because I don't pass a college class it doesn't means I won't never graduate. I don't trust in Carl's Double Blind Test because that challenge was designed to loss, not to win, so $10K up front just to have a fun, it isn't bad at all. I think Carl will loss anyway because no matter if I win or not, I won't sign any document because I don't represent any manufacturer.

Arch

 

[EE THr]

People

This content won't change anything. I will keep finding treasures with a MFD like always. Because I don't pass a college class it doesn't means I won't never graduate. I don't trust in Carl's Double Blind Test because that challenge was designed to loss, not to win, so $10K up front just to have a fun, it isn't bad at all. I think Carl will loss anyway because no matter if I win or not, I won't sign any document because I don't represent any manufacturer.

Arch

Exactly none of what you said there actually applies to Carl's test. So what is your point? Do you just feel that you have to post something, no matter how ridiculous it is?





A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

 

[aarthrj3811]

Exactly none of what you said there actually applies to Carl's test. So what is your point? Do you just feel that you have to post something, no matter how rediculous it is?

Simple facts..Carl and Randi have both been challenged..End of subject..They either except the challenges or they refuse..Art

 

[EE THr]

Exactly none of what you said there actually applies to Carl's test. So what is your point? Do you just feel that you have to post something, no matter how rediculous it is?

Simple facts..Carl and Randi have both been challenged..End of subject..They either except the challenges or they refuse..Art

Stick to the proper sequence, Art, they challenged you first. And you refused first.

So, the ball is still in your court. There is no way out of that.





A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

Stick to the proper sequence, Art, they challenged you first. And you refused first.
So, the ball is still in your court. There is no way out of that.

Yes they did make a challenge first. In Randi’s case it has been over 25 years and no one has taken the test. In Carl’s case it has been over 10 years that I am aware of...Not one sucker has fell for it...Just maybe we understand what these fake tests are about. History is a great teacher.
I think that you do not know what a the mening of a Dead Horse ..Art

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

Stick to the proper sequence, Art, they challenged you first. And you refused first.
So, the ball is still in your court. There is no way out of that.

Yes they did make a challenge first. In Randi’s case it has been over 25 years and no one has taken the test. In Carl’s case it has been over 10 years that I am aware of...Not one sucker has fell for it...Just maybe we understand what these fake tests are about. History is a great teacher.
I think that you do not know what a the mening of a Dead Horse ..Art

Yes, I know the meaning.

If someone could pass either test, they would have tried by now. If, for some reason, the test was not as advertised, or they passed and didn't get paid, there would have been a law suit filed by now.

So, what it means, is that no LRL can actually score even 70% on Carl's test, when, if all was true that has been claimed about them, they should be able to score 100% on an easy test like that, with no interference, and ten visable locations to choose from---much, much easier than actual hunting "in the field."

So if LRLs can't find the stuff in an easy setup test, they sure can't find anything in the field.

And that's a dead horse!







A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

 

[architecad]

~EE~

Stick to the proper sequence, Art, they challenged you first. And you refused first.
So, the ball is still in your court. There is no way out of that.

Yes they did make a challenge first. In Randi’s case it has been over 25 years and no one has taken the test. In Carl’s case it has been over 10 years that I am aware of...Not one sucker has fell for it...Just maybe we understand what these fake tests are about. History is a great teacher.
I think that you do not know what a the mening of a Dead Horse ..Art

Art

Don't waste your time with those guys.

Arch

 

[Carl-NC]

I was very clear with my propose. I said, "10K up front win or not." I didn't say, "10k for failure". Please, don't twist my statement.

I'm just reading the advertisement, I didn't write it. If you thought you could do anything other than fail, you wouldn't have made that proposal.

 

[architecad]

I was very clear with my propose. I said, "10K up front win or not." I didn't say, "10k for failure". Please, don't twist my statement.

I'm just reading the advertisement, I didn't write it. If you thought you could do anything other than fail, you wouldn't have made that proposal.

read topic #48

Arch

 

[EE THr]

read topic #48

Arch

Someone needs to tell you that there is only one topic in this thread.

It's reply #48. Ask one of your neighbors to explain it, if any of them will actually speak to you.








A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

 

[architecad]

read topic #48

Arch

Someone needs to tell you that there is only one topic in this thread.

It's reply #48. Ask one of your neighbors to explain it, if any of them will actually speak to you.








A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

Excuse me !! this is my thread, nobody have to explain what I have to write here. I know what I'm posting. Thanks

Next Skeptics,.......

Arch

 

[woof!]

I already underbid you by $2,000.

--Toto

 

[architecad]

I already underbid you by $2,000.

--Toto

nonsense!

Arch

 

[aarthrj3811]

Hey arch..You can clearly see that the skeptics are in a panic..You and puffdaddy have clearly taken away the only talking point that they had left. ..Art