Being new to metal detecting, and living in the Portland area I have been doing much research lately to find out where I can go metal detecting without fear of breaking some law. So today, June 26, 2013 I called Portland Parks and Recreation ((503) 823-7529) and spoke to them about it and was told it is ok as long as certain stipulations are met.
Park property can not be destroyed (obviously) and that everything must be put back in good condition so that there are no holes and grass is not torn up. Shovels not allowed but when I described to her the lesche type tool we use and how it is used to cut a small plug ¾ circle then flip back the grass, place any dirt removed from the hole and placed on a towel so it can all be placed back in the hole without leaving a mess, she said that is fine.
I also found a link to a list of all Portland parks , on Wikipedia, which is great, Here is the link:
List of parks in Portland, Oregon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Also there is a Park Finder link on Portland Parks & Recreation Website:
Find A Park/Facility | The City of Portland, Oregon
I also was told by the Oregon City parks that it is ok to MD in their parks, same rules as above, I emailed the Oregon City park a request, and a photo of my lesche tool and explained the method of digging a plug as I mentioned above and was told fine.
I also emailed Clackamas County parks and they replied with a quote of their regulation that in short says NO Metal Detecting!
I hope this helps. Now that I've got the "green light" on the parks I hope to start finding some cool stuff for a change!
McClod, so what you're saying is, that you got two "yes's" and one "no". And the "no" was backed up by an actual specific/real rule that said "no metal detecting". Right?
All I can say about those two that said 'sure, go ahead', is the following points:
a) Had you already looked up those two cities codes, to see if there was anything that said "no detecting"? Obviously there's nothing that says that, as attested by the fact that you got a "yes", afterall. right? So .... then what would have stopped you from simply looking that up in city muni codes, and park rules, for yourself? I mean, if there's no prohibitions saying "no metal detectors", then .... it's not prohibited, right?
b) that's great that you got a yes. But you do know, that it could also have gone this way: "no", simply because we said so. Or because we think you'll harm the grass or earthworms, etc... And what will be odd is, if later on, you find out that other locals there detect, and no one ever had a problem before. In other words: "no's" have sometimes followed your scenario, where .... people have and do detect w/no issues. The old
"no one cared till you asked" routine. (simply because whomever your asking is in a bad mood, or has an image of geeks with shovels, or ... who knows? And truth be told might never have given the matter a moment's thought). This has happened quite frequently, where someone gets a no, where detecting had never and never is, a problem. It just happened here in CA, for instance: A fellow I was exchanging pms with in a certain southern CA county, learned that some friends of mine from down there were getting silver from a certain park. When I told him the name of the park, he emailed back and said
"I thought you couldn't detect there? How'd you get in there?" To which I emailed back and said "who told you that?" You guessed it .... HE ASKED. But the park is routinely hit, for the past umpteen years. And ... as long as you're not being a nuisance or sticking out, no one cares.
c) I bet you could call back those same cities tomorrow, and risk an entirely different answer ("no"). This had happened to people before, where ... oddly, one person gets a yes from one city person at the park kiosk, where the other gets a "no" at city hall, or vice-versa. Heck, for example, I knew a guy who had forgotten to get the name of the person who had told him "yes". He figured, a week later "rats, I forgot to get that person's name in case I'm accosted". So he went back to the VERY SAME DESK, and tried to find out who it was he'd spoken to the week earlier. But it was a different person manning the desk this time, and neither of them (despite physical description, etc...) could figure out who it was (since this is a big city). So the md'r thought "no problem, I'll just ask the current person I'm talking to". And guess what? The person said "no". So you see, ... your answer just depends on who you ask, their mood, their perceptions of your questions, how you ask it, etc... Why subject yourself to that arbitrary whim? Why not look it up for yourself?
d) A lot of times when a person gets a "yes" (as you did), it's easy to conclude "gee it's a good thing I asked". Or conversely, if someone gets a "no", they also think "gee it's a good thing I asked, otherwise I could have been arrested". So you see, either answer (a "yes" or a "no") seems to reinforce to some people that it was "good that they asked". In other words, it seems to infer that asking the person was necessary, because their "yes" or their "no" implies that their say-so was needed, to begin with. Lest, I guess you might think that they would have answered:
"that's a silly question. why are you asking me? you don't need my permission". No. Authority will rarely answers like that. They will bestow on you their princely "yes" or their princely "no", because .... afterall... you asked. The fact that you are asking them, merely implies that their say-so was needed (lest why else would you be asking them?). So the fact of a "yes" or a "no", to me, does not infer that therefore "
asking was necessary".
e) there's been cases of persons getting a "yes" as you did. So they gleefully head out to the park. But lo & behold, someone (a gardener, a cop, or whatever) comes up to gripe. The md'r proudly whips out his "permission" (name to drop, etc...). But guess what happens? The griper gets on his cell-phone, calls down to city hall, and says "
.... but he's tearing the place up" (which isn't true, of course). And then .... guess what happens to your permission?
A lot of this is a mute point, since you got a "yes". But I'm just saying, in the future, be careful. Look it up for yourself. If there's nothing there saying no detecting, then .... presto, there you go.