You've posted an image of a stemless crinoid with no scale and no identification. The segments of their feeding arms would be tiny indeed. Your illustrations are not indicative of much beyond your enthusiasm to win a disagreement.
You, gatorboy, are trying to squeeze your quirky identification into the known science. How many fossil stemmed crinoids did you find from Florida in your Google search? That's right . . . none. For that matter, I can't find a reference to a fossil stemless crinoid from Florida, though I can't exclude that possibility. Just not in the Peace River.
In the areas of the country where Palaeozoic rock is exposed, crinoid columnals are commonly called 'Indian beads.' I can understand how little sections of silicified invertebrate burrows might come to be called 'Indian beads' as well. But, mistaking burrow sections for crinoid columnals is unusual . . . I'd not heard that one before. Now it's time to come down to earth. The Peace River 'beads' are not crinoid parts any more than they are mini cake donuts.