gldnbrew
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2013
- Messages
- 152
- Reaction score
- 172
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- The 1000 Islands, NY
- Detector(s) used
- Garrett AT Pro and ATMax, 8.5 x 11, 5 x 8 & a Super Sniper - Pro-pointer.
Fisher F75 LTD, XP Deus - 11", Garrett AT and AT ZLINK pointer
Minelab equinox 900 - 11” and 6”
- Primary Interest:
- Relic Hunting
- #1
Thread Owner
Been using QGIS for about a month now using 1 meter LIDAR image tiles, and there is an item I am having trouble with.
When I load the raster images into Qgis there are two numbers that appear below them (Ex: 75.345 and 235.589). My question is, are these the min. - max elevations of the tile or are they some numerical value? The reason I ask, is I have three adjoining tiles with a wide creek in them, but the lower number (75.345) which I am assuming is the creek does not appear on the other two tiles. When I do a hillshade and then do a contour, assign the automatic color ramp, none of the adjoining tiles match in color, some colors not even close for the same contour. I have tried importing a custom color ramp of the min - max using all three tiles, but that is not working either. How do I correct this? Also, I am assuming that these numbers are in meters, is that correct.
Thanks,
Paul
When I load the raster images into Qgis there are two numbers that appear below them (Ex: 75.345 and 235.589). My question is, are these the min. - max elevations of the tile or are they some numerical value? The reason I ask, is I have three adjoining tiles with a wide creek in them, but the lower number (75.345) which I am assuming is the creek does not appear on the other two tiles. When I do a hillshade and then do a contour, assign the automatic color ramp, none of the adjoining tiles match in color, some colors not even close for the same contour. I have tried importing a custom color ramp of the min - max using all three tiles, but that is not working either. How do I correct this? Also, I am assuming that these numbers are in meters, is that correct.
Thanks,
Paul