I have been reading a lot of things on this forum and others, and wanted to post some facts for those of you that have trouble with the so called authorities about treasure hunting, now or in the future.
1. All courts in this land are adversarial.
This means that absent a complaining party, or one that has been injured or damaged, there can be no case heard. The state or city, or county, or federal government may not bring charges against anyone, absent the presence of an adversary. This means a real human being. The cop cannot be that human being, and be a part of the proceedings, and be the one bringing the charges at the same time. His buddy the DA cannot either. That is a violation of the separation of powers act. The cop is the executive branch, the DA is the judicial branch. How does the ticket or charge get to the DA if there is a separation of powers ? It can't legally. This proves collusion and is a violation of your due process. Particularly, the fairness of a hearing or trial. If we truly had separation, explain the Attorneys General position ? He is the top cop in the governments, local and state, yet he is both executive and judicial branch at the same time. Don't believe everything you read or hear, check it out. Do the research like I have. Technically speaking under their laws, we could bring a federal lawsuit against the AG's offices nationwide for violation of the RICO act. They fit all criteria for a criminal gang definition. Google is your friend.
2. Standing in court:
The courts cannot hear a case of controversy, unless it has standing, or an adversary that is injured with a real, not imagined injury, and unless they have redressability. This means the ability for the court to correct it, or make it right. These three essential elements must be present and proven with facts, before a case may be heard in any court. Injury, harm, redressability. Without these being proven first, the courts have no jurisdiction to hear the case.
So why do so many people just pay traffic tickets, that have no jurisdiction to be heard by a court in the first place, and no adversary ? Because the supreme court has ruled that if you do not know your rights and the rules of the court and laws, they have no obligation to tell you. Your lawyer will certainly not tell you or fight his buddy lawyers in court with these facts of black letter, real laws...they would have him disbarred, meaning kick him out of their little club, which is actually nothing but a labor organization in which the lawyers oath he takes to join states, that his first duty is to the court !.....not his client !....look it up. Google is your friend.
3. Statutes are not law.
This term comes from the ancient Greek meaning, a law given without reason. This is not Greece, it is America, and in this country, every single thing must have a reason given in court, and clearly defined and proven beyond any doubt. Statutes come under color of law which means hidden and deceitful. No statute in this country or any state, has any applicability to any person, and nobody can produce evidence they do. I know this because I have asked the Attorneys General of the U.S. for this proof, federal judges, state, local, and city councils.....none could give it to me and the standard answer was "because we say so"........ Sorry folks, but in court, that is not good enough. Without proving every element and moving on as they call it, is a violation of your due process and an automatic overturn on appeal. Google is your friend.
4. Fairness.
In a court proceeding, the judge is supposed to be a fair, impartial, and independent decision maker. Any time he varies from that, he has committed a crime. How convenient for them that they all got together with the legislators and had a statute made up that says they are immune from prosecution or lawsuits in performance of their duties.
If the judge sides with the prosecution on any point, it is a due process violation. He isn't suppose to have a side, he is the arbitrator. The only way to fight this set up in court against you is to attack the conflict of interest. All judges were previous prosecutors. All one need do is ask the judge who he represents here today ? If he says the state, ask him.... if there was a conflict of interest in the court, would he consider it to be a fair trial or hearing ?...then ask him who signs his paycheck ?
The state does, and the state is the one bringing charges against you. Collusion, clear and simple, and provable in court. There is a provable conflict of interest on the record with two questions. It is impossible to have a fair trial with this system. Even the cop is paid by the same state. Three against one is not fair in anybody's book, especially the appellate courts....why? They are all trying for a seat at the big show, the supreme court appointment and the big bucks and getting in the history books. So these people try to keep their records spotless and be benevolent guardians of justice. If they refuse to see justice done on some measly little appeal about a treasure hunter that proved there was no case of controversy, and was railroaded through the system anyway by a corrupt judge and prosecutor in collusion together, and he takes it to the supreme court, they will look like idiots, be sanctioned by the supreme court for their actions, kicked off the bench, and never realize their dream of being one themselves. In some cases, criminal charges have been filed against corrupt judges. Google is your friend.
5. Lawyers.
Never hire a lawyer, ever. There is no license required to practice law in this country according to the supreme court of the u.s....and if your state you live in wants to remain a member of the united states, they must abide by these supremacy clause rulings. I have already informed you they do not work for you. Do not trust anyone with your affairs, is my free advice to all. If you want it done right, do it yourself, it's easy. The courts have ruled and recognized the right for people to represent themselves and others in court. This is known as pro per, pro se, and first friend. The supreme court mackenzie ruling takes it one step further. Google is your friend.
6. Cart before the horse.
Before you can prove somebody violated a law or statute, it must first be proven it applies to them.
All courts are supposed to presume you innocent until found guilty....and they do not, none of them, and this is provable immediately. When you walk in, ask the judge if you are presumed innocent of all charges, he will say yes.
Then ask him if you are presumed innocent of every essential element of the charges, he should say yes if being truthful, if he lies and says no, then he violated your due process, case dismissed. If he says yes, then ask him if he can confirm that the prosecution has given him sufficient evidence to prove the applicability of the law, code, statute, or even the constitution to you, and that this court has jurisdiction over you, or to even hear this case ? He will give you the bum's rush and automatically violate your due process by yelling, 'This court has jurisdiction over you'...never mind there is no proof, he will do it anyway. Automatic overturn on appeal.
He cannot take jurisdiction because he is not suppose to be on anyone's side, once again. The prosecutions job is to prove the court has jurisdiction over you by supplying the adversary that was injured to point the finger at you. So you object and ask the judge....Please, I have a point of clarification, could you please explain to me how you can say I am presumed innocent of all elements, until proven in this court, yet presume the law applies to me without proof being laid on the evidence table by the prosecution ?...Once again, if he proceeds without asking the prosecutor for the proof of applicability of the laws or statute to you, he has colluded with them. Automatic overturn on appeal.
If this judge is fair, he should turn to the prosecutor and ask him if he has the evidence. The prosecutor if telling the truth, will say, I have nothing your honor....case dismissed.
You see folks, they know all this, and they lie, and cheat, and steal every day from everyone. They know they have no right to hear a case without injury or an adversary, both of them ! Yet they do it everyday because as stated before, sadly, most people do not know the law or their rights. If they continue against you anyway, you should file a misconduct complaint against the judge with the judicial revue board, and malicious prosecution charges against the prosecutor. You cannot sue the judge, but you can get hold of the risk management for the state and attack his bond through his insurance company and hold him responsible for causing an actual injury to you. A financial settlement against these criminal bureaucrats in government will hit them where they really care about it, in the pocketbook.....then maybe they will start to abide by their oaths and the real laws. They are nothing more than revenue agents collecting taxes for the state.
There is much more, but this is getting long. I hope this spurs some of you on to do your own research about what real laws are and to protect yourself against unwarranted attacks. If you don't believe it, go park at a meter downtown and get a parking ticket, then fight it in court this way and watch what happens. It is relatively safe and you have little chance of being jailed that way, but it will prove that what I tell you is fact. Watch how they squirm when you start asking these questions searching for facts. Watch the prosecutor start shuffling papers on his desk, watch a grown man in a black dress start screaming like a five year old having a tantrum.....when he is supposed to be there for one reason and one reason only, to make sure it is fair to you.
comments and questions welcomed........rip
1. All courts in this land are adversarial.
This means that absent a complaining party, or one that has been injured or damaged, there can be no case heard. The state or city, or county, or federal government may not bring charges against anyone, absent the presence of an adversary. This means a real human being. The cop cannot be that human being, and be a part of the proceedings, and be the one bringing the charges at the same time. His buddy the DA cannot either. That is a violation of the separation of powers act. The cop is the executive branch, the DA is the judicial branch. How does the ticket or charge get to the DA if there is a separation of powers ? It can't legally. This proves collusion and is a violation of your due process. Particularly, the fairness of a hearing or trial. If we truly had separation, explain the Attorneys General position ? He is the top cop in the governments, local and state, yet he is both executive and judicial branch at the same time. Don't believe everything you read or hear, check it out. Do the research like I have. Technically speaking under their laws, we could bring a federal lawsuit against the AG's offices nationwide for violation of the RICO act. They fit all criteria for a criminal gang definition. Google is your friend.
2. Standing in court:
The courts cannot hear a case of controversy, unless it has standing, or an adversary that is injured with a real, not imagined injury, and unless they have redressability. This means the ability for the court to correct it, or make it right. These three essential elements must be present and proven with facts, before a case may be heard in any court. Injury, harm, redressability. Without these being proven first, the courts have no jurisdiction to hear the case.
So why do so many people just pay traffic tickets, that have no jurisdiction to be heard by a court in the first place, and no adversary ? Because the supreme court has ruled that if you do not know your rights and the rules of the court and laws, they have no obligation to tell you. Your lawyer will certainly not tell you or fight his buddy lawyers in court with these facts of black letter, real laws...they would have him disbarred, meaning kick him out of their little club, which is actually nothing but a labor organization in which the lawyers oath he takes to join states, that his first duty is to the court !.....not his client !....look it up. Google is your friend.
3. Statutes are not law.
This term comes from the ancient Greek meaning, a law given without reason. This is not Greece, it is America, and in this country, every single thing must have a reason given in court, and clearly defined and proven beyond any doubt. Statutes come under color of law which means hidden and deceitful. No statute in this country or any state, has any applicability to any person, and nobody can produce evidence they do. I know this because I have asked the Attorneys General of the U.S. for this proof, federal judges, state, local, and city councils.....none could give it to me and the standard answer was "because we say so"........ Sorry folks, but in court, that is not good enough. Without proving every element and moving on as they call it, is a violation of your due process and an automatic overturn on appeal. Google is your friend.
4. Fairness.
In a court proceeding, the judge is supposed to be a fair, impartial, and independent decision maker. Any time he varies from that, he has committed a crime. How convenient for them that they all got together with the legislators and had a statute made up that says they are immune from prosecution or lawsuits in performance of their duties.
If the judge sides with the prosecution on any point, it is a due process violation. He isn't suppose to have a side, he is the arbitrator. The only way to fight this set up in court against you is to attack the conflict of interest. All judges were previous prosecutors. All one need do is ask the judge who he represents here today ? If he says the state, ask him.... if there was a conflict of interest in the court, would he consider it to be a fair trial or hearing ?...then ask him who signs his paycheck ?
The state does, and the state is the one bringing charges against you. Collusion, clear and simple, and provable in court. There is a provable conflict of interest on the record with two questions. It is impossible to have a fair trial with this system. Even the cop is paid by the same state. Three against one is not fair in anybody's book, especially the appellate courts....why? They are all trying for a seat at the big show, the supreme court appointment and the big bucks and getting in the history books. So these people try to keep their records spotless and be benevolent guardians of justice. If they refuse to see justice done on some measly little appeal about a treasure hunter that proved there was no case of controversy, and was railroaded through the system anyway by a corrupt judge and prosecutor in collusion together, and he takes it to the supreme court, they will look like idiots, be sanctioned by the supreme court for their actions, kicked off the bench, and never realize their dream of being one themselves. In some cases, criminal charges have been filed against corrupt judges. Google is your friend.
5. Lawyers.
Never hire a lawyer, ever. There is no license required to practice law in this country according to the supreme court of the u.s....and if your state you live in wants to remain a member of the united states, they must abide by these supremacy clause rulings. I have already informed you they do not work for you. Do not trust anyone with your affairs, is my free advice to all. If you want it done right, do it yourself, it's easy. The courts have ruled and recognized the right for people to represent themselves and others in court. This is known as pro per, pro se, and first friend. The supreme court mackenzie ruling takes it one step further. Google is your friend.
6. Cart before the horse.
Before you can prove somebody violated a law or statute, it must first be proven it applies to them.
All courts are supposed to presume you innocent until found guilty....and they do not, none of them, and this is provable immediately. When you walk in, ask the judge if you are presumed innocent of all charges, he will say yes.
Then ask him if you are presumed innocent of every essential element of the charges, he should say yes if being truthful, if he lies and says no, then he violated your due process, case dismissed. If he says yes, then ask him if he can confirm that the prosecution has given him sufficient evidence to prove the applicability of the law, code, statute, or even the constitution to you, and that this court has jurisdiction over you, or to even hear this case ? He will give you the bum's rush and automatically violate your due process by yelling, 'This court has jurisdiction over you'...never mind there is no proof, he will do it anyway. Automatic overturn on appeal.
He cannot take jurisdiction because he is not suppose to be on anyone's side, once again. The prosecutions job is to prove the court has jurisdiction over you by supplying the adversary that was injured to point the finger at you. So you object and ask the judge....Please, I have a point of clarification, could you please explain to me how you can say I am presumed innocent of all elements, until proven in this court, yet presume the law applies to me without proof being laid on the evidence table by the prosecution ?...Once again, if he proceeds without asking the prosecutor for the proof of applicability of the laws or statute to you, he has colluded with them. Automatic overturn on appeal.
If this judge is fair, he should turn to the prosecutor and ask him if he has the evidence. The prosecutor if telling the truth, will say, I have nothing your honor....case dismissed.
You see folks, they know all this, and they lie, and cheat, and steal every day from everyone. They know they have no right to hear a case without injury or an adversary, both of them ! Yet they do it everyday because as stated before, sadly, most people do not know the law or their rights. If they continue against you anyway, you should file a misconduct complaint against the judge with the judicial revue board, and malicious prosecution charges against the prosecutor. You cannot sue the judge, but you can get hold of the risk management for the state and attack his bond through his insurance company and hold him responsible for causing an actual injury to you. A financial settlement against these criminal bureaucrats in government will hit them where they really care about it, in the pocketbook.....then maybe they will start to abide by their oaths and the real laws. They are nothing more than revenue agents collecting taxes for the state.
There is much more, but this is getting long. I hope this spurs some of you on to do your own research about what real laws are and to protect yourself against unwarranted attacks. If you don't believe it, go park at a meter downtown and get a parking ticket, then fight it in court this way and watch what happens. It is relatively safe and you have little chance of being jailed that way, but it will prove that what I tell you is fact. Watch how they squirm when you start asking these questions searching for facts. Watch the prosecutor start shuffling papers on his desk, watch a grown man in a black dress start screaming like a five year old having a tantrum.....when he is supposed to be there for one reason and one reason only, to make sure it is fair to you.
comments and questions welcomed........rip
? ....To Serve and "Protect".....It's all a lie folks, get use to it. They are tax collectors plain and simple.
can I dig a hole or not?
