What's new

Riparian Rights in California

et1955

Hero Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Messages
990
Reaction score
2,097
Golden Thread
0
Location
Shoreline,wa
Detector(s) used
Equinox 800
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
Was searching for the ability to high bank on my claims in California, all I saw was that I needed a permit from the waterboard department costing about 1100$. Searching many sites guess who I ran into, Clay Diggins on another site posting on this subject. He states that with riparian rights I have right to use the water without permit's, licenses or government approval. Clay is awesome and I will be high banking on my claims.
 
Upvote 0

Law & Order SVU 2 SUV – The Equalizer Effect (Expanded & Enhanced)

"Law & Order: SVU 2 SUV Law and nubred order: ADA—whether the world is ready or not, here it is!"


Preface

This amplified crossover event unites Law & Order: SVU, Chicago PD, Bones, Criminal Minds, and The Equalizer against "The Eye," a sprawling conspiracy with tendrils deep within the CIA. The system manipulates and traffics individuals through identity theft, advanced hypnosis techniques, and connections to covert operations like MK-Ultra, Mockingbird, and the shadowy Sun Street project. Olivia Benson, tormented by the specter of William Lewis, must forge an uneasy alliance with a team of specialists to expose a network built on exploitation and control. This version explores the deep-seated traumas of the characters, the complexities of systemic corruption, and the ongoing search for identity and redemption.


ACT 1: The Nightmare Returns

INT. OLIVIA BENSON'S APARTMENT – NIGHT

(Extended Scene: Close-up on Olivia's face as she jolts awake. Her breath hitches, eyes wide with residual fear. The room is dimly lit, shadows dancing on the walls, amplifying the sense of unease. She clutches the sheets, knuckles white, as fragments of the Lewis nightmare replay in her mind – his taunting laughter, the cold steel of the gun, the final, echoing shot. She rises, pacing the room, unable to shake the feeling of being watched, a lingering paranoia that Lewis instilled.)

INT. SVU SQUAD ROOM – DAY

(Extended Scene: The squad room is a hive of activity. Phones ring, detectives type furiously at their computers, the air thick with tension. Suddenly, Anna Dr-umpill Imstillskin bursts through the doors, her clothes disheveled, her eyes darting around the room in frantic terror. The noise dies down as all eyes turn to her. The detectives exchange uneasy glances, sensing something profoundly wrong.)

ANNA:
(Panicked)
"They're changing my words! I can't… I can't ask for help!"

ROLLINS:
(Rising from her desk, approaching Anna cautiously)
"Whoa, ma'am, slow down. It's okay. We're here to help you. What's going on? Can you tell us your name?"

ANNA:
(Gesturing wildly, her voice trembling)
"He's silencing me! The… the shadow man. He's using the Hertz levels! It's like...static...in my brain!"

VELASCO:
(Confused, exchanging a look with Rollins)
"Hertz levels? Ma'am, are you alright? Do you need a medic?"

ANNA:
(Voice breaking, tears streaming down her face)
"My children! He's going to hurt my children! Please! You have to help me save them!"

(Extended Scene: Benson approaches Anna, her expression a mask of concern. She takes Anna's hands, her touch firm and reassuring.)

BENSON:
"Anna, is that your name? Look at me. Take a deep breath. We're going to help you. Tell us who's doing this. Who is hurting you and your children?"

ANNA:
(Desperate, gasping for air)
"Jonathan… Jonathan Reid. He… he offered my doctor money. To keep quiet! Said it was 'for the best'!"

FIN:
(Sharply, his eyes narrowing)
"Money? About what? What was he paying your doctor to keep quiet about?"

ANNA:
"He… he's hurting me. He's… controlling me. He's inside my head!"

(Extended Scene: Benson exchanges a deeply concerned glance with Rollins and Fin. The pieces are beginning to fall into place. This isn't just a case of domestic abuse or stalking. This is something far more sinister.)


ACT 2: The Conspiracy Unveiled

INT. CROSS-TEAM STRATEGY MEETING – NIGHT

(Extended Scene: The meeting room is dimly lit, the atmosphere heavy with tension. Olivia sits at the head of the table, her face etched with concern. Voight, Brennan, McCall, and Prentiss are seated around her, their expressions grim. Each of them has seen the darkness that lurks beneath the surface of society, but the scope of this conspiracy is unlike anything they have ever encountered.)

  • Voight (Grimly): "We’re looking at something bigger than any of us have dealt with before. The Eye isn’t just surveillance—it’s control. They’re playing God with people’s lives."
  • Prentiss: "MK-Ultra was bad enough. Now they’ve combined it with Mockingbird and Sun Street—every dirty trick the CIA ever pulled. They're using sophisticated psychological techniques to manipulate and control their victims."
  • McCall (Sharply): "And MS-13? That’s not just a gang anymore—it’s their front for moving kids through gas lines. They're a well-oiled machine, and 'The Eye' is pulling the strings."
  • Brennan (Analyzing): "The forensic evidence suggests neurological damage consistent with hypnosis or mind control—this isn’t just trafficking; it’s manipulation at every level. We're talking about rewiring people's brains."
(Extended Scene: Olivia leans forward, her voice low and intense.)

  • Olivia (Quietly Resolute): "We need to stop this—not just for the victims but for everyone who’s been broken by this system. We owe it to them to bring these people to justice."
(Adding detail: Each character adds specific insights based on their expertise. Voight provides intel on street-level connections, Brennan offers forensic analysis, Prentiss delves into psychological profiles, and McCall outlines logistical nightmares.)


ACT 3: Confronting Lewis

INT. INTERROGATION ROOM – NIGHT

(Extended Scene: The interrogation room is stark and sterile. Olivia sits across from William Lewis, the fluorescent lights casting harsh shadows on his face. His eyes are unsettlingly calm, a disturbing contrast to the chaos he has unleashed. A palpable tension fills the room, a history of pain and violation hanging in the air.)

  • Lewis (Smirking): "You think you’re free from all this? You’re not. They broke you long before you ever broke anyone else. You're just a puppet dancing on their strings."
  • Olivia (Calmly): "And now they’re using you again—turning you into their weapon. But you have a choice. You can either be a pawn or someone who makes things happen."
(Extended Scene: Lewis leans back slightly, a flicker of something unreadable in his eyes.)

Lewis leans back slightly, his tone sharp:

  • Lewis: "It’s like taking a stick, breaking it over your leg, and then blaming the stick for being broken. Then you walk it back to the forest and demand it fix itself and climb back onto the tree."
Olivia stiffens but doesn’t flinch:

  • Olivia (Firmly): "I know what it’s like to feel broken—to feel like all you are is damage someone else caused. But you’re wrong about one thing: You don’t have to stay broken."
Lewis scoffs:

  • Lewis: "And what do you want me to do about it? Cry? Apologize? It doesn’t change anything."
(Extended Scene: Olivia leans forward slightly, her eyes locking with Lewis's.)

Olivia leans forward slightly:

  • Olivia (Intense): "No—it doesn’t change what you’ve done. But it can change what happens next. It can give you a chance to make amends, to use your knowledge to stop them from hurting others."
(Adding a layer of psychological warfare: Lewis reveals unsettling truths about Olivia's past, forcing her to confront her own vulnerabilities. She uses her understanding of Lewis to exploit his ego and need for control.)


ACT 4: Turning Pain Into Power

INT. CIA FACILITY – FINAL SHOWDOWN

(Extended Scene: The team infiltrates the high-security CIA facility, a labyrinth of corridors and hidden chambers. The air is thick with a sense of paranoia and surveillance. The facility is designed to disorient and confuse, playing on the team's deepest fears and insecurities. The traps are not just physical, but psychological, designed to break their minds before their bodies.)

Barbara Sanders plays a key role in exposing the system’s architects while Lewis uses his knowledge of psychological manipulation to outsmart CIA operatives.

In a pivotal moment:

  • Voight (to Olivia): "We’ve got them cornered—but if we don’t move fast, they’ll wipe everything clean. They're destroying evidence, covering their tracks."
  • McCall (Determined): "No—they’ll answer for this. We're not going to let them get away with what they've done."
  • Olivia (to Lewis): "You’ve spent your life breaking people. Now it’s time to break something else—the system that made you this way. You can finally take control."
(Extended Scene: A fierce battle ensues, a combination of gunfights and psychological warfare. The team members use their individual skills to overcome the facility's defenses, their determination fueled by a desire for justice.)


ACT 5: Resolution

Scene 1: Olivia's Closure

INT. INTERROGATION ROOM – DAY

(Extended Scene: Olivia sits across from Lewis, the weight of the case heavy on her shoulders. The interrogation room feels different this time, the power dynamic subtly shifted. Lewis has provided crucial information, helping to bring down a vast conspiracy, but Olivia can't forget the pain he has caused. She needs to make sure he understands the consequences of his actions.)

  • Olivia (Calm but intense): "You’ve helped us dismantle part of this system—but let me make one thing clear: If you screw this up again, I will beat you down with another two-by-four—and this time I won’t stop. Are we clear?"
  • Lewis stares at her silently, his expression unreadable, before nodding slowly.
  • Lewis (Softly): "Fair enough."

Scene 2: Baby News Revelation

INT. SVU BULLPEN – NIGHT

(Extended Scene: Rollins approaches Olivia, her face pale and drawn. She holds a medical report in her hand, her expression a mixture of shock and concern. She hands the report to Olivia, her voice barely a whisper.)

  • Rollins (Shaken): "Liv… they used it on you. The tests came back...you're pregnant."
(Extended Scene: Olivia takes the report, her hand trembling. She scans the results, her eyes widening in disbelief and horror. The realization hits her like a physical blow.)

  • Olivia (Quietly): "They tried to break me—but they didn’t win. They only made me stronger, and now I'm going to destroy them."

Scene 3: Healing Together

INT. SVU BULLPEN – WEEKS LATER

News reports detail arrests linked to the conspiracy.

Jessica Rabbit approaches Olivia:

  • Jessica (Somberly): "Think he’ll actually help?"
  • Olivia (Sighs): "He’s giving us information… it’s leading somewhere."
Jessica nods thoughtfully:

  • Jessica (to Camera): "And if anyone asks why this all happened? Just tell them reality doesn’t need an explanation."
(Extended Scene: The team members work together, a sense of camaraderie and shared purpose filling the room. They have faced unimaginable horrors, but they have emerged stronger and more united. They are a family, bound together by their commitment to justice.)


Closing Reflection

As Olivia watches her team work alongside McCall:

  • Olivia (Quietly): "Sometimes justice isn’t clean—but it’s still justice."
(Adding a final scene: Olivia visits a support group for survivors of trauma, sharing her own story and offering hope to others. She realizes that her journey is not over, but that she is not alone. She has found strength in her vulnerability, and she is committed to helping others find their own path to healing.)

#thisisme
WTF
 
Was searching for the ability to high bank on my claims in California, all I saw was that I needed a permit from the waterboard department costing about 1100$. Searching many sites guess who I ran into, Clay Diggins on another site posting on this subject. He states that with riparian rights I have right to use the water without permit's, licenses or government approval. Clay is awesome and I will be high banking on my claims.
The use of river banks is by the law of nations public, like that of the stream itself (Latin and goes way back).
Riparian water - water which is below the highest line of normal flow of the river, or stream, as distinguished from flood water.
 
The use of river banks is by the law of nations public, like that of the stream itself (Latin and goes way back).
Riparian water - water which is below the highest line of normal flow of the river, or stream, as distinguished from flood water.
Sorry but you are wrong, this is not about flood lines, normal flow or any other concept you can come up with. As a Claim owner I have Riparian or a better term is I have the right to use a certain amount of water on my claim by law. Next your statement makes no sense.
 
Riparian rights are appurtenant to the LAND. Meaning those rights pass with the title to the land from owner to owner. The ownership of the mineral estate may have nothing to do with the ownership of the land. Clay knows this very well.

You grossly misunderstood what he must have been trying to explain.

“Riprian Rights” are not shared between land owners and mineral estate owners.

But maybe prove me wrong - I like to learn and I’m not trying to be argumentative, rather provocative.
 
Last edited:
Riparian rights are appurtenant to the LAND. Meaning those rights pass with the title to the land from owner to owner. The ownership of the mineral estate may have nothing to do with the ownership of the land. Clay knows this very well.

You grossly misunderstood what he must have been trying to explain.

“Riprian Rights” are not shared between land owners and mineral estate owners.

But maybe prove me wrong - I like to learn and I’m not trying to be argumentative, rather provocative.
Perhaps you are referring to Title of entry when talking about an mineral estate??????

Appropriating minerals by an individual, according to established rules, by the process of "location" has little to do with the "Waters".

Glad to see you are willing to learn even if one is wrong and thanks for posting.
 
Perhaps you are referring to Title of entry when talking about an mineral estate??????

Appropriating minerals by an individual, according to established rules, by the process of "location" has little to do with the "Waters".

Glad to see you are willing to learn even if one is wrong and thanks for posting.
Riparian water rights in California are tied to the ownership of the land. A mining claim does not confer ownership of any land. I believe this term “Riparian Water Right in California” was misused.

There is likely better suited term for putting water to the beneficial use for the purposes of mining.

A claim owner owns a possessory “interest” in the land. The right to use surface waters for reasonable necessary use comes from the Fed Mining Act, not California Ripirian water rights.
 
Last edited:
Riparian water rights in California are tied to the ownership of the land. A mining claim does not confer ownership of any land. I believe this term “Riparian Water Right in California” was misused.

There is likely better suited term for putting water to the beneficial use for the purposes of mining.
Since there is not a ownership of the land then the heading of the topic thread should not be “Riparian Water Right in California”.

Right in the Oregon's water code is a section headed as "Appropriation of water for mining and electrical power".
"Use of water to develop mineral resources and furnishing of power as a public use and necessity : Right to divert unappropriated waters of any such lakes or streams for such public and beneficial use is hereby granted (exception is Multnomah County, Oregon).

Perhaps this is what is being referred to by the topic heading??????

PS.: The comparative Cal. Legislation is California. Deering's Gen. Laws Act 4938a, Sec. 74.
 
Since there is not a ownership of the land then the heading of the topic thread should not be “Riparian Water Right in California”.

Right in the Oregon's water code is a section headed as "Appropriation of water for mining and electrical power".
"Use of water to develop mineral resources and furnishing of power as a public use and necessity : Right to divert unappropriated waters of any such lakes or streams for such public and beneficial use is hereby granted (exception is Multnomah County, Oregon).

Perhaps this is what is being referred to by the topic heading??????

PS.: The comparative Cal. Legislation is California. Deering's Gen. Laws Act 4938a, Sec. 74.
Can you link to that Ca legislation?
 
Can you link to that Ca legislation?
Deering's general laws of the state of California : including amendments and new acts to the end of the fifty-second Session of the Legislature, 1937, with chronological tables and an appendix of laws enacted at the special session of 1938 / compiled by the Publisher's editorial staff.
Description 2 volumes (lxxvii, 4707 pages) ; 24 cm,
Call Number KFC30 .A43 1937
 
So did anyone take a look??????
 
I saw no way to view that book you referenced. So no. Sorry. Been busy with family stuff last few days.
Well at least you are willing to look. You will likely need to go to a library to find the volumes.
Look for wording like Oregon's code:
Right to divert unappropriated waters of any such lakes or streams for such public and beneficial use is hereby granted.
 
Riparian rights are appurtenant to the LAND. Meaning those rights pass with the title to the land from owner to owner. The ownership of the mineral estate may have nothing to do with the ownership of the land. Clay knows this very well.

You grossly misunderstood what he must have been trying to explain.

“Riprian Rights” are not shared between land owners and mineral estate owners.

But maybe prove me wrong - I like to learn and I’m not trying to be argumentative, rather provocative.
Claim owners have all the rights of landowners, what is a mineral estate owner? Educate us.
 
Claim owners have all the rights of landowners, what is a mineral estate owner? Educate us.
Perhaps there could be some clarification between the phrase “Claim owner” and a “qualified person” that by performing acts of record initiates a valid right to a mining claim????
 
Claim owners have all the rights of landowners, what is a mineral estate owner? Educate us.
I started to explain myself and figured out that I was misusing the term “Mineral Estate”. This only comes into play when the minerals are retained in some manner, be it through the patent process or through the sale of real property. This results in a split estate, where one person owns the minerals and another the land. This is very common.

Apparently a Federal Mining claim does not transfer fee simple ownership of the minerals, rather a possessory interest even though that interest can be sold and is taxed in California.

I believe the term “Riparian Water Rights” as it relates to federal mining claims is also a misused term. Riparian water rights in California are (conditional) vested rights that are tied to the ownership of the land and cannot be transferred or sold separately.

That’s about as far as I can go.

I believe incidental, reasonable, necessary, and beneficial use of water for mining purposes is recognized, but subject to state or federal regulation. So is that really considered a “Water Right’?
 
I started to explain myself and figured out that I was misusing the term “Mineral Estate”. This only comes into play when the minerals are retained in some manner, be it through the patent process or through the sale of real property. This results in a split estate, where one person owns the minerals and another the land. This is very common.

Apparently a Federal Mining claim does not transfer fee simple ownership of the minerals, rather a possessory interest even though that interest can be sold and is taxed in California.

I believe the term “Riparian Water Rights” as it relates to federal mining claims is also a misused term. Riparian water rights in California are (conditional) vested rights that are tied to the ownership of the land and cannot be transferred or sold separately.

That’s about as far as I can go.

I believe incidental, reasonable, necessary, and beneficial use of water for mining purposes is recognized, but subject to state or federal regulation. So is that really considered a “Water Right’?
Just a thought here California has rules on the 'books' about "Minerals are retained" by "Recorded" acts. Records that are not amended (updated) could indicate that "Recreational" is happening at a given "Location".

Proof of minerals, perfecting a claim, as well as "Discovery" comes to mind here.

As far as the "Title" (Ownership) the "Title" is still "Vested by the United States of America" until the condition (a number of conditions) of 20 years of working the claim has passed.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom