Sarah Palin & one for the good guys :)

[DeepseekerADS]

?Scandalous Hat Trick?: Sarah Palin Shreds Obama & His Scandal-Embroiled White House | TheBlaze.com

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

A History of Mining on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska - Grab it through Amazon!

[onfire]

He's starting to realize Rain can melt all that SUGAR Coating.

 

[Native Floridian]

Obama's problem isn't that he had his hand in illegal activity, it's that he had his hands too far removed. His hands off policy has come back to smack him in the face.

The problem with the republicans on Benghazi is that they over reached, they tried for a knock out punch. That comes back to haunt them as most of the declassified documents along with the Pickering report support the official version of events. Combined with Issa getting nothing from round one except more mud on the right wing slander machine, in that Hicks had to admit he wasn't demoted as the right has said over and over.

On Benghazi, Obama dropped the ball in the reaction. To many hands in the bickering over how to present what happened. But in the end, republicans who had a hand in the lies of over WMDs speaking in high terms of brave Americans needlessly being killed need a reality check. Start with looking in a mirror.

On the AP probe O's White House press secretary contradicted history be stating O supported a new shield act law while he was a Senator. The same shield act law that O opposed and knocked down as President.

The biggie is the IRS. No one like the IRS and yet everyone has to deal with them. IRS top managers knew as early as 2011 that conservative groups were being targeted. Yet that news took two years to reach Obama.

Obama today, stands watching his second term agenda circling the drain, not because his hand is in any illegal activity, but because he was too hands off. The president comes off at the very least looking very unpresidential when it's the media that tells him what's going on. IOWS get a clue!

At least he's got someone to hold an umbrella for him.

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

Obama's problem isn't that he had his hand in illegal activity, it's that he had his hands too far removed. His hands off policy has come back to smack him in the face.

The problem with the republicans on Benghazi is that they over reached, they tried for a knock out punch. That comes back to haunt them as most of the declassified documents along with the Pickering report support the official version of events. Combined with Issa getting nothing from round one except more mud on the right wing slander machine, in that Hicks had to admit he wasn't demoted as the right has said over and over.

On Benghazi, Obama dropped the ball in the reaction. To many hands in the bickering over how to present what happened. But in the end, republicans who had a hand in the lies of over WMDs speaking in high terms of brave Americans needlessly being killed need a reality check. Start with looking in a mirror.

On the AP probe O's White House press secretary contradicted history be stating O supported a new shield act law while he was a Senator. The same shield act law that O opposed and knocked down as President.

The biggie is the IRS. No one like the IRS and yet everyone has to deal with them. IRS top managers knew as early as 2011 that conservative groups were being targeted. Yet that news took two years to reach Obama.

Obama today, stands watching his second term agenda circling the drain, not because his hand is in any illegal activity, but because he was too hands off. The president comes off at the very least looking very unpresidential when it's the media that tells him what's going on. IOWS get a clue!

At least he's got someone to hold an umbrella for him.

You actually believe obama knew nothing about the IRS targeting the Tea Party and other conservatives in the middle of a heated presidential election...:banghead:

So obama knew nothing about ......

Benghazi
Fast and Furious
IRS
AP

Looks like Clint Eastwood was right...


Reminds me of something....hummm I know.....


Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

[Native Floridian]

You actually believe obama knew nothing about the IRS targeting the Tea Party and other conservatives in the middle of a heated presidential election...:banghead:

So obama knew nothing about ......

Benghazi
Fast and Furious
IRS
AP

Looks like Clint Eastwood was right...


Reminds me of something....hummm I know.....


Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

And 10 years ago you believed there were Weapons of Mass Destruction. The same hate machine that told you that is telling you this. You were wrong then and you are wrong now.

You ever heard this: Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me.

I'm thinking you haven't.

Why do you still listen to those who mislead you?

Geez, you think people would learn.

That said O's looking a little like an empty chair right now! Agreed!

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

NF, how do you know what I was thinking 10 years ago? I was not a member here....



Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

NF, how do you know what I was thinking 10 years ago? I was not a member here....

Remember all Saddam had to do was open up and let UN inspectors look, he refused...

The last thing we want is rouge nations with nukes or WMD..... You don't wait till they hit you to respond....

We need to look harder at N.Korea right now, not after they launch a missile that can carry a payload and reach our shores.

I would much rather fight them on their soil and not ours.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

[bevo]

I voted for Sarah, not mcblame.

 

[Native Floridian]

You do know the targeting started two years before the election? You do understand what targeting means, right?

And you do understand that with the Supreme Court ruling in the Citizens United case that the IRS was inundated with 501C applications? Because you say targeting as if it made a difference in the election.

Here is something you can check out. Noone from any of the "groups" who had their applications delayed was put in jail, detained or kept from voting.

here is is a novel idea - let's apply the rules of good marksmanship to our judgements here. That is let's go with ready - aim - fire. Instead of the way the right is doing it, which is "Fire!"

Let's have an investigation first. I'm all for a special prosecutor. let's pick a right wing attack dog and sic him on O. Then after he's completed his investigation, then we can have a burning at the stake! Whadyasay? Do it right, like reasonable people, or just do the old fashioned way and just find a tree?

Of course, if the attack dog clears O, says he didn't know, then we can just go with asleep at the wheel. Clint can go back to what he does best, making movies, and we can all find new imaginary giants to slay.

 

[pippinwhitepaws]

sarah palin? the same person who believes the american revolution was fought " because the british wanted to take our guns"?

this would be humorous if most of yo didn't believe in propaganda over reality.

 

[Native Floridian]

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

So you've flip flopped over the past ten years? Ten years ago you were a raging liberal. Got it!

No WMDs! WMDs were the ONLY reason we attacked Iraq. The rest just backspin to cover the lie. With lots of help from people you and others here listen to, respect, and quote. Let's start with Ann Coulter.

Sad so many of our young boys and girls had to die for a lie. Thousands of our people died. For a lie.

Ann Coulter was all for sending our brave young men and women to their deaths for the lie. Now she points the finger at obama! And you listen? Are you kidding me?




Something for you to check out - did you know that 60 days before the war we didn't have any troops tasked to or trained to find, disarm. or dispose of WMDs? How funny is that?

 

[bevo]

What do you think the redcoats were doing in lexington?

 

[onfire]

N.F How can you still bring up WMD's You say there was none (Do you really think Sadam was that dumb?) There was talk he could have moved them to Syria (Maybe that's why we don't offer help there fear of finding them and proving Bush right.

Besides that didn't both sides agree they had them? The Bush thing is getting so old you need a better train.

Either your one of the 3.5 Floridians on food stamps or your one of the 47% Romney slipped about. Which is o.k. we still have 3% over that.

 

[bevo]

I had a friend in intel. at the time, he couldnt give me details, but told me he believed there were wmd's.

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

So no one that was illegally targeted and harassed went to jail so that makes it OK, no harm, no foul.

Over 10 million Americans had their medical records illegally seized too, is that also no harm, no foul?

Fast and Furious, IRS, Libya, AP phone records, Facebook messages, attack on Constitution.........

Just where do you call foul? I call foul on each one......

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

[CoilyGirl]

Uh if memory serves me right there was NO cover up and no lying and cherry picked or cleverly( or not so cleverly as the case may be )rendered emails concerning the WMD debacle and Bush was going on solely what intelligence provided him with.Apples and oranges Native Floridian.

 

[GMD52]

Secret

Please define propaganda and reality as you see them, I'm not sure you know the difference yourself!

 

[DeepseekerADS]

sarah palin? the same person who believes the american revolution was fought " because the british wanted to take our guns"?

this would be humorous if most of yo didn't believe in propaganda over reality.

Number one, you don't know enough about history to start talking about it. The British entered Lexington to confiscate fire arms and powder. Us older people, we remember when teachers actually taught facts.

Number two, I got your "reality" hanging all over me - parasites and recipients everywhere you look.

I do believe it is too late for you to learn, and then they will come for you too.

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

So you've flip flopped over the past ten years? Ten years ago you were a raging liberal. Got it!

No WMDs! WMDs were the ONLY reason we attacked Iraq. The rest just backspin to cover the lie. With lots of help from people you and others here listen to, respect, and quote. Let's start with Ann Coulter.

Sad so many of our young boys and girls had to die for a lie. Thousands of our people died. For a lie.

Ann Coulter was all for sending our brave young men and women to their deaths for the lie. Now she points the finger at obama! And you listen? Are you kidding me?




Something for you to check out - did you know that 60 days before the war we didn't have any troops tasked to or trained to find, disarm. or dispose of WMDs? How funny is that?

NF, I was conservative with some liberal views in my younger days. I have always been a strong believer in our Constitution and BOR. I am also a vet of Viet Nam war...

I am conservative and if believing in our constitution and its BOR and in holding our leaders to their oath of office to preserve, protect and defend our constitution makes me right wing then I guess I am right wing and guilty...

Speaking as a vet, I repeat I would rather be fighting on their shores than ours.

It is a fact Saddam Hussein was working on WMD, that is known, where they went to we don't know, if he still had them we don't know, he did launch scud missiles at Israel during the war so we know he had the ability to use them.....He attacked Kuwait with out provocation as well..... Saddam had multiple chances and did nothing with them. He killed far, far more of his own people than died in the war

Saddam was given the chance, all he had to do was allow UN inspectors in, he refused.

I have no issue with our taking Saddam out, even if only based on a 50/50 chance he had WMD.



Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

[bevo]

I repeat
I had a friend in intel. at the time, he couldnt give me details, but told me he believed there were wmd's.