Sarah Palin & one for the good guys :)

At least get the quote right.

"There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." ::)

And 10 years ago you believed there were Weapons of Mass Destruction. The same hate machine that told you that is telling you this. You were wrong then and you are wrong now.

You ever heard this: Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me.

I'm thinking you haven't.

Why do you still listen to those who mislead you?

Geez, you think people would learn.

That said O's looking a little like an empty chair right now! Agreed!
 

NO WMDs! None, not one!

Coily girl about the WMDs -try this - 60 days before the attack some Jr Army intel officer noticed that there was no unit within the invasion force tasked with finding and dealing with WMDs. He was, in so many words told, that the grown ups had it under control. But it did catch the attention of some higher ups who decided something needed to be done. What was done is a unit of truck mechanics were repurposed as WMD specialist. This unit recieved no special training and wasn't forward deployed. So CG, whadaya think? Strange that the purpose for war was because the of the deadly threat these weapons presented, but yet an untrained unit to deal with them? A unit renamed as an afterthought? This is what is called a tell. And what it tells us is that Bush and company knew darn well there were no WMDs. Going to war over WMDs without a highly trained unit that could deal with these weapons? Isn't that little like going fishing without a pole? No rod, no reel, no hooks, no bait, no net, no hope of the truth.

Tell #2 - unlike the Gulf war where we put together a coalision of allies to ride along with us, on this round most of the world told us to get lost. England joined us readily but past them our major allies joined us reluctantly or not at all. Remember how pissed we were at France and Germany? Both said there were no WMDs. We were pissed but they were right. Ann Coulter wasn't going to convince them to send their bravest to their deaths. They did right.

tell#3 Richard Clarke - Richard told the Bush admin that Saddam had nothing to do with 911. he also told them if they attacked Iraq that it would be turned into a war against Islam by the extremist and that it would become a terrorist magnet. We would be mired down there for years. I'd say Richard knew what he was talking about, you agree? Bush didn't. He fired him and then scape goated him for 911. The only man in our country who knew 911 was coming, couldn't get anyone to listen, got tarred as a disgruntled govt employee. Of course they had to do that, Richard was the smoking gun who could finger the Bush admin for 911. He had'em by the short and curlies and they knew it.

Getting rid of Saddam, a good thing? Of course, but not the reason we went to war. We went to war for a lie.

Is it sad or funny that you believe everything the Bush admin told you?
 

Last edited:
N.F How can you still bring up WMD's You say there was none (Do you really think Sadam was that dumb?) There was talk he could have moved them to Syria (Maybe that's why we don't offer help there fear of finding them and proving Bush right.

Besides that didn't both sides agree they had them? The Bush thing is getting so old you need a better train.

Either your one of the 3.5 Floridians on food stamps or your one of the 47% Romney slipped about. Which is o.k. we still have 3% over that.

Americans died because of a lie. That will never get old. It will become Bush's legacy.

Do i think Saddam was that dumb? No!

What did Saddam do? Wave his hand and make not only the weapons disappear, but all traces of their production, transportation and storage? We were watching him with the best equipment on the planet. We missed that? The truck mechanics couldn't find the stuff? Just what half assed explanation has gotten you through the night over the past ten years?


As soon as it became obvious that there were no WMDS the Bush admin started back pedalling. WMDS were no longer the reason we went to war. That might have worked in Abe Lincoln's time but today we've got video tape.

As for my financial status, I'm on food stamps! Busted! So what, it doesn't devalue my voice!
 

Last edited:
NF, fact still remains Saddam had WMD, he used them and he refused to allow the United Nations full access to check for WMD......It was his refusal that was the final trigger for the war.

Fact... Saddam had and used Iraqi chemical weapons on his own people killing 10's of thousands of them.
Fact.....Saddam invaded Iran, fact they used gas extensively in that war.
Fact....Saddam invaded a defenceless country.... Kawait.
Fact....Saddam fired missiles at Israel.

NF, you are saying we should have waited until we have had an attack physically on this country before we did something, what kind of uproar would there have been if a WMD was smuggled into this country and used on our people, what uproar would there have been about why we did not take the weapons out when we knew they had them?



Here is another fact......

War On Terror: As the regime of Bashar Assad disintegrates, the security of his chemical arsenal is in jeopardy. The No. 2 general in Saddam Hussein's air force says they were the WMDs we didn't find in Iraq.
King Abdullah of neighboring Jordan warned that a disintegrating Syria on the verge of civil war puts Syria's stockpile of chemical weapons at risk of falling into the hands of al-Qaida.

"One of the worst-case scenarios as we are obviously trying to look for a political solution would be if some of those chemical stockpiles were to fall into unfriendly hands," he said.

The irony here is that the chemical weapons stockpile of Syrian thug Assad may in large part be the legacy of weapons moved from Hussein's Iraq into Syria before Operation Iraqi Freedom.

If so, this may be the reason not much was found in the way of WMD by victorious U.S. forces in 2003.

In 2006, former Iraqi general Georges Sada, second in command of the Iraqi Air Force who served under Saddam Hussein before he defected, wrote a comprehensive book, "Saddam's Secrets."

It details how the Iraqi Revolutionary Guard moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria in advance of the U.S.-led action to eliminate Hussein's WMD threat.

As Sada told the New York Sun, two Iraqi Airways Boeings were converted to cargo planes by removing the seats, and special Republican Guard units loaded the planes with chemical weapons materials.


There were 56 flights disguised as a relief effort after a 2002 Syrian dam collapse.

There were also truck convoys into Syria. Sada's comments came more than a month after Israel's top general during Operation Iraqi Freedom, Moshe Yaalon, told the Sun that Saddam "transferred the chemical agents from Iraq to Syria."

Both Israeli and U.S. intelligence observed large truck convoys leaving Iraq and entering Syria in the weeks and months before Operation Iraqi Freedom, John Shaw, former deputy undersecretary of defense for international technology security, told a private conference of former weapons inspectors and intelligence experts held in Arlington, Va., in 2006.

According to Shaw, ex-Russian intelligence chief Yevgeni Primakov, a KGB general with long-standing ties to Saddam, went to Iraq in December 2002 and stayed until just before the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003.

Anticipating the invasion, his job was to supervise the removal of such weapons and erase as much evidence of Russian involvement as possible.

The Russian-assisted "cleanup" operation was entrusted to a combination of GRU and Spetsnaz troops and Russian military and civilian personnel in Iraq "under the command of two experienced ex-Soviet generals, Colonel-General Vladislav Achalov and Colonel-General Igor Maltsev, both retired and posing as civilian commercial consultants."

Washington Times reporter Bill Gertz reported on Oct. 30, 2004, that Achalov and Maltsev had been photographed receiving medals from Iraqi Defense Minister Sultan Hashim Ahmad in a Baghdad building bombed by U.S. cruise missiles during the first U.S. air raids in early March 2003. Apparently they did their job well.

An article in the fall 2005 Middle East Quarterly reports that in an appearance on Israel's Channel 2 on Dec. 23, 2002, Israel's prime minister, Ariel Sharon, stated: "Chemical and biological weapons which Saddam is endeavoring to conceal have been moved from Iraq to Syria." According to the article, about three weeks later, Israel's foreign minister repeated the accusation.

Syria has long had its own chemical weapons program, but the extent it may have been aided by weapons and materials transferred by Iraq before the war has only been the source of conjecture.

We may soon find out what happened to much of Saddam's WMD.

Many Of Syria's Chemical Weapons May Have Come From Saddam Hussein's Iraq - Investors.com


Ask any service man why they serve, most will tell you it is for a love of country and to protect our country and our families, they would also tell you they would rather fight the enemy on our enemies soil than on our soil...
 

sorry, but gas wmds have a shelf life. and it's not 10 years th. Just for giggles , google LtCol Karen Kwatowski, The office of Special Plans, Sybil Edmunds, the Doefler report, also google who pulled the weapon inspectors out of Iraq.

Then after you do all that and reconvince yourself that the invasion was a great thing, ask yourself, WHY DID WE INVADE A SOVERIEGN COUNTRY TO FIND A SINGLE PERSON THAT WAS LIVING IN THE TORA BORA REGION OF AFGANISTAN.

you certainly have a lot of suppostions, but none are backed by fact.

You might also check what bush senior had to say to saddam prior to saddam invading Kuwait.
 

NF, fact still remains Saddam had WMD, he used them and he refused to allow the United Nations full access to check for WMD......It was his refusal that was the final trigger for the war.

Fact... Saddam had and used Iraqi chemical weapons on his own people killing 10's of thousands of them.
Fact.....Saddam invaded Iran, fact they used gas extensively in that war.
Fact....Saddam invaded a defenceless country.... Kawait.
Fact....Saddam fired missiles at Israel.

NF, you are saying we should have waited until we have had an attack physically on this country before we did something, what kind of uproar would there have been if a WMD was smuggled into this country and used on our people, what uproar would there have been about why we did not take the weapons out when we knew they had them?

Here is another fact......

War On Terror: As the regime of Bashar Assad disintegrates, the security of his chemical arsenal is in jeopardy. The No. 2 general in Saddam Hussein's air force says they were the WMDs we didn't find in Iraq.
King Abdullah of neighboring Jordan warned that a disintegrating Syria on the verge of civil war puts Syria's stockpile of chemical weapons at risk of falling into the hands of al-Qaida.

"One of the worst-case scenarios as we are obviously trying to look for a political solution would be if some of those chemical stockpiles were to fall into unfriendly hands," he said.

The irony here is that the chemical weapons stockpile of Syrian thug Assad may in large part be the legacy of weapons moved from Hussein's Iraq into Syria before Operation Iraqi Freedom.

If so, this may be the reason not much was found in the way of WMD by victorious U.S. forces in 2003.

In 2006, former Iraqi general Georges Sada, second in command of the Iraqi Air Force who served under Saddam Hussein before he defected, wrote a comprehensive book, "Saddam's Secrets."

It details how the Iraqi Revolutionary Guard moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria in advance of the U.S.-led action to eliminate Hussein's WMD threat.

As Sada told the New York Sun, two Iraqi Airways Boeings were converted to cargo planes by removing the seats, and special Republican Guard units loaded the planes with chemical weapons materials.

There were 56 flights disguised as a relief effort after a 2002 Syrian dam collapse.

There were also truck convoys into Syria. Sada's comments came more than a month after Israel's top general during Operation Iraqi Freedom, Moshe Yaalon, told the Sun that Saddam "transferred the chemical agents from Iraq to Syria."

Both Israeli and U.S. intelligence observed large truck convoys leaving Iraq and entering Syria in the weeks and months before Operation Iraqi Freedom, John Shaw, former deputy undersecretary of defense for international technology security, told a private conference of former weapons inspectors and intelligence experts held in Arlington, Va., in 2006.

According to Shaw, ex-Russian intelligence chief Yevgeni Primakov, a KGB general with long-standing ties to Saddam, went to Iraq in December 2002 and stayed until just before the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003.

Anticipating the invasion, his job was to supervise the removal of such weapons and erase as much evidence of Russian involvement as possible.

The Russian-assisted "cleanup" operation was entrusted to a combination of GRU and Spetsnaz troops and Russian military and civilian personnel in Iraq "under the command of two experienced ex-Soviet generals, Colonel-General Vladislav Achalov and Colonel-General Igor Maltsev, both retired and posing as civilian commercial consultants."

Washington Times reporter Bill Gertz reported on Oct. 30, 2004, that Achalov and Maltsev had been photographed receiving medals from Iraqi Defense Minister Sultan Hashim Ahmad in a Baghdad building bombed by U.S. cruise missiles during the first U.S. air raids in early March 2003. Apparently they did their job well.

An article in the fall 2005 Middle East Quarterly reports that in an appearance on Israel's Channel 2 on Dec. 23, 2002, Israel's prime minister, Ariel Sharon, stated: "Chemical and biological weapons which Saddam is endeavoring to conceal have been moved from Iraq to Syria." According to the article, about three weeks later, Israel's foreign minister repeated the accusation.

Syria has long had its own chemical weapons program, but the extent it may have been aided by weapons and materials transferred by Iraq before the war has only been the source of conjecture.

We may soon find out what happened to much of Saddam's WMD.

Many Of Syria's Chemical Weapons May Have Come From Saddam Hussein's Iraq - Investors.com

Ask any service man why they serve, most will tell you it is for a love of country and to protect our country and our families, they would also tell you they would rather fight the enemy on our enemies soil than on our soil...

Applauding truth .
 

here's a question that has bugged me for years.
If W thought there were wmd's ( poison gas we know of) in Iraq, ok.
But everyone has known for years that north korea has some nuclear weapons, so why didn't W go after those? Why invade over a gnat, yet ignore a hornet?
 

Jeff that's an easy one - NK actually has WMDs. There is a real threat they could be used on us or nearby allies if we tried to disarm them. IOW, they could hurt us. Above that, though we aren't neighborly, there is that Sovereign nation thing. We have no right to invade them.

That could change with the new kid. As he tries to consolidate power he's a bit of a loose cannon.
 

that's my point, Iraq was a sovereign nation too, but it's perceived weapons caused W to go in. NK is more of a threat to the US and allies. I get the 'they can hurt us point' but I would like to see whatever policies evenly used. ( sheesh what am I talking about? they are ALL politicians)
 

North Korea ?? didn't we try that once? And lost. Lets see who was in office then?

NF you talked about France and Germany, didn't $$$$ have a lot to do with them telling us to pound sand?
Still didn't answer the Question If both sides of the aisle agreed there were WMD's why is it W fault??
You can believe if Bush was a community organizer every one would believe it.
 

Americans died because of a lie. That will never get old. It will become Bush's legacy.

Do i think Saddam was that dumb? No!

What did Saddam do? Wave his hand and make not only the weapons disappear, but all traces of their production, transportation and storage? We were watching him with the best equipment on the planet. We missed that? The truck mechanics couldn't find the stuff? Just what half assed explanation has gotten you through the night over the past ten years?


As soon as it became obvious that there were no WMDS the Bush admin started back pedalling. WMDS were no longer the reason we went to war. That might have worked in Abe Lincoln's time but today we've got video tape.

As for my financial status, I'm on food stamps! Busted! So what, it doesn't devalue my voice!

War does not determine who is right - only who is left.
 

North Korea ?? didn't we try that once? And lost. Lets see who was in office then?

NF you talked about France and Germany, didn't $$$$ have a lot to do with them telling us to pound sand?
Still didn't answer the Question If both sides of the aisle agreed there were WMD's why is it W fault??
You can believe if Bush was a community organizer every one would believe it.

because the "evidence" was manufactured, kinda like the out of the blue bull that has been going on about Bengahzi where a certain party took the liberty to manufacture "quotes" in emails that aren't really there. Why would a certain party do something like that?

Again, read the Doefler report, find out why the weapon inspectors were recalled and who recalled them. BTW, the only thing bush could organize was a beer party and a way to avoid the VietNam War
 

Excuse me David was it not your King who tried to throw a BEER party??
 

So, TH, just to to see if i have this straight, you are telling me that Saddam moved all his WMDs to Syria before we invaded? Is that it? Cause that makes no sense! Saddam had all these weapons not to use on us, but to use on the Iranians and minority factions within his own country. It was his way of keeping these factions in line. On top of that, the previous times that Saddam's rule came under threat he used those weapons on the factions within his own country. of course in his war with Iran he used them mercilessly. lastly, these moved WMDs were Saddam's last line of defense.

So, what you are saying here is that Saddam willingly gave up these WMDs, his last line of defense against us? A weapon he has long and proven history of using against those who go against him? And, you are saying that he instead of using these WMDS as a terror weapon against us, or to help defend his regime, he gave them to the Syrians? The same Syrians who were Iran's closest ally? Those Syrians? Yeah, that makes sense!

You are aware that Colin Powell has said that His UN presentation justifying war based on WMDs was a miserable failure. he gets mad when bloggers accuse him of knowingly lying. He didn't know the information was false. He believed as he had been told, that the briefing had been prepared by the NSC. In fact it had been prepared by Scooter Libby. the point is, he admits that the information was false. he points to Cheney, Libby's boss as the reason.

You are aware that the Downing Street Memos, British intel from July 2002 called war between The united States and iraq was inevitable. That Bush was intent on removing Hussein and that the pretext for war was being constructed around 911 and WMDs. Though British intel seriously doubted the weapons existed.

And you are araware that no serious dicussions of war took place within our own administration. it was never debated.

And you are aware, that today the drumbeat of war with syria is building. And, that again we need a pretext to war. And, though Syria has had it's own WMD program in place for years, that "moved WMDs" supports that pretext for war?

And no i'm not Ok with a WMD or any attack in this country or on this country. All I'm saying is that for as upset as you are over all the lies of obama hillary and the rest of the left you give a pass to biggest lie of our times. One that cost tens of thousands of lives. And here you are, ten years later still defending the lie. That is what i'm not Ok with.
 

Last edited:
Here you go again NF and Davest, you must have missed it.........................FACTS!


NF, fact still remains Saddam had WMD, he used them and he refused to allow the United Nations full access to check for WMD......It was his refusal that was the final trigger for the war.

Fact... Saddam had and used Iraqi chemical weapons on his own people killing 10's of thousands of them.
Fact.....Saddam invaded Iran, fact they used gas extensively in that war.
Fact....Saddam invaded a defenceless country.... Kawait.
Fact....Saddam fired missiles at Israel.

NF, you are saying we should have waited until we have had an attack physically on this country before we did something, what kind of uproar would there have been if a WMD was smuggled into this country and used on our people, what uproar would there have been about why we did not take the weapons out when we knew they had them?



Here is another fact......

War On Terror: As the regime of Bashar Assad disintegrates, the security of his chemical arsenal is in jeopardy. The No. 2 general in Saddam Hussein's air force says they were the WMDs we didn't find in Iraq.
King Abdullah of neighboring Jordan warned that a disintegrating Syria on the verge of civil war puts Syria's stockpile of chemical weapons at risk of falling into the hands of al-Qaida.

"One of the worst-case scenarios as we are obviously trying to look for a political solution would be if some of those chemical stockpiles were to fall into unfriendly hands," he said.

The irony here is that the chemical weapons stockpile of Syrian thug Assad may in large part be the legacy of weapons moved from Hussein's Iraq into Syria before Operation Iraqi Freedom.

If so, this may be the reason not much was found in the way of WMD by victorious U.S. forces in 2003.

In 2006, former Iraqi general Georges Sada, second in command of the Iraqi Air Force who served under Saddam Hussein before he defected, wrote a comprehensive book, "Saddam's Secrets."

It details how the Iraqi Revolutionary Guard moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria in advance of the U.S.-led action to eliminate Hussein's WMD threat.

As Sada told the New York Sun, two Iraqi Airways Boeings were converted to cargo planes by removing the seats, and special Republican Guard units loaded the planes with chemical weapons materials.


There were 56 flights disguised as a relief effort after a 2002 Syrian dam collapse.

There were also truck convoys into Syria. Sada's comments came more than a month after Israel's top general during Operation Iraqi Freedom, Moshe Yaalon, told the Sun that Saddam "transferred the chemical agents from Iraq to Syria."

Both Israeli and U.S. intelligence observed large truck convoys leaving Iraq and entering Syria in the weeks and months before Operation Iraqi Freedom, John Shaw, former deputy undersecretary of defense for international technology security, told a private conference of former weapons inspectors and intelligence experts held in Arlington, Va., in 2006.

According to Shaw, ex-Russian intelligence chief Yevgeni Primakov, a KGB general with long-standing ties to Saddam, went to Iraq in December 2002 and stayed until just before the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003.

Anticipating the invasion, his job was to supervise the removal of such weapons and erase as much evidence of Russian involvement as possible.

The Russian-assisted "cleanup" operation was entrusted to a combination of GRU and Spetsnaz troops and Russian military and civilian personnel in Iraq "under the command of two experienced ex-Soviet generals, Colonel-General Vladislav Achalov and Colonel-General Igor Maltsev, both retired and posing as civilian commercial consultants."

Washington Times reporter Bill Gertz reported on Oct. 30, 2004, that Achalov and Maltsev had been photographed receiving medals from Iraqi Defense Minister Sultan Hashim Ahmad in a Baghdad building bombed by U.S. cruise missiles during the first U.S. air raids in early March 2003. Apparently they did their job well.

An article in the fall 2005 Middle East Quarterly reports that in an appearance on Israel's Channel 2 on Dec. 23, 2002, Israel's prime minister, Ariel Sharon, stated: "Chemical and biological weapons which Saddam is endeavoring to conceal have been moved from Iraq to Syria." According to the article, about three weeks later, Israel's foreign minister repeated the accusation.

Syria has long had its own chemical weapons program, but the extent it may have been aided by weapons and materials transferred by Iraq before the war has only been the source of conjecture.

We may soon find out what happened to much of Saddam's WMD.

Many Of Syria's Chemical Weapons May Have Come From Saddam Hussein's Iraq - Investors.com


Ask any service man why they serve, most will tell you it is for a love of country and to protect our country and our families, they would also tell you they would rather fight the enemy on our enemies soil than on our soil...
 

[SIZE=+1]2003 UN Report: Iraq Sulfur Mustard Gas Chemical Weapons Have High Quality After 12 years of Storage[/SIZE]
March 2003 UN Iraq WMD Report ^ | June 22 2006 | jveritas
Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 2:38:34 PM by jveritas

Since the story broke yesterday about finding 500 Shells of Chemical Weapons in Iraq, shells that contain Sulfur Mustard Gas or Sarin Gas, the Left and their media were quick to dismiss this extremely important find by using the lame excuse that these Chemical weapons Shells were produced before 1991 and hence its not effective anymore because it has much lower quality”. However in March 2003 UN report about Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction there is the following on page 77 (Page 79 of the pdf file), paragraph 1 of the report http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/documents/6mar.pdf :

“ The Sulfur Mustard contained in artillery shells that had been stored for over 12 years, had been found by UNMOVIC to be still of high purity. It is possible that viable filled artillery shells and aerial bombs still remain in Iraq.
The above form the United Nations inspectors and the darling of the Left Hans Blix totally destroy the stupid lies that the Left and their media has been spewing since the breakings new of yesterday. First the UN clearly state in March 2003 that the Mustard gas shells they found are of HIGH QUALITY even it had been STORED FOR OVER 12 YEARS. Second the UN admit that there may still VIABLE i.e. EFFECTIVE Mustrad filled artillery shell hidden in Iraq, and yesterday we learned for a fact that there were indeed 500 Mustard gas artillery shells that were found in Iraq since the removal of Saddam. Also it is safe to conclude that the Mustard Gas shells found after the war are still in high quality and highly effective Chemical weapons. Another very important fact to add is that Saddam had LIED to the UN inspectors and the world when he said that he had destroyed ALL his Chemical Weapons and other WMD. It does not matter whether these weapons were produced before or after 1991, his job was to destroy it ALL and not hide anything not a one ounce of these WMD, he DID NOT.
 

I get an error message when I tried to go to that site.

Now as I was saying. If 500 artillery shells filled with sarin gas or mustard gas were discovered in Iraq, George "the dumber" bush, dick cheney, and don Rumsfeld would have been photographed dancing on the pile of them while smoking Cuban cigars and singing Glory, Glory Hallelujah. But alas, no such photograph exists although upon further research a picture of an f-16 being uncovered in the desert of Iraq is available. Condosleeza Rice took no time claiming it was such a weapon that she spoke of during her 12 minutes of fame.

TH, take the time and read the report Hans Blix gave to the security council, you'll find it way different than the one you are presenting. Don't forget to delve into the thought of "WHO REMOVED THE WEAPON INSPECTORS FROM IRAQ BEFORE THEIR JOB WAS FINISHED".
 

TH, we are headed to war with Syria. Today, a pretext for war is being layed. The Moved WMDs theory has been trotted out and is being given new life. The problem for all of us is that it's *******. The problem for you is that people you don't like , starting with obama are going to start quoting the moved WMD theory as a reason to invade Syria.

if nothing else, Bush proved that large segments of the American people can be fooled. He even deceived his own Secretary of State.

You are going to have to make a choice - back the president or believe the truth.
 

NF,

I have a major problem with any country having chemical and biologicial weapons, but even more so when it is an Arab country with ties to terrorists..... As I have said many times, I would rather be fighting a war there than here or one of their weapons denoated here and I support our government taking out WMD held by those countries...

Syria is in a civil war, if Asad falls the potential for those weapons to fall in terrorist hands are greatly increased...

From WIKI
"On July 23, 2012 Syria admitted to possessing a stockpile of chemical weapons which it claims are reserved for national defense against foreign countries.[SUP][1][/SUP] During the Syrian civil war in August 2012, the Syrian military restarted chemical weapons testing at a base on the outskirts of Aleppo.[SUP][2][/SUP][SUP][3][/SUP] Chemical weapons were a major point of discussion between the Syrian government and world leaders, with military intervention being considered by the West as a potential consequence of the use of such weapons.[SUP][4]"


(CNN) -- The Syrian Foreign Ministry said Monday the country has chemical or biological weapons, but would never use them against its citizens -- only against foreign attackers.

"Any stocks of (weapons of mass destruction) or any unconventional weapon that the Syrian Arab Republic possesses would never be used against civilians or against the Syrian people during this crisis at any circumstance, no matter how the crisis would evolve," ministry spokesman Jihad Makdissi told reporters.

"All the stocks of these weapons that the Syrian Arab Republic possesses are monitored and guarded by the Syrian army. These weapons are meant to be used only and strictly in the event of external aggression against the Syrian Arab Republic," he said Monday.

The United States called for Syria to never use the weapons and keep them safely stored.

Syria says it has weapons of mass destruction in case of foreign attack - CNN.com

[/SUP]
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom