Signal Lines

While I appreciate the rather backhanded compliment here, I must disagree with your assumption that I'm here seeking attention. I could care less who pays attention to me.
What I'm seeking are answers.

Look, I cannot reconcile in my head, logically, how dowsing is supposed to work, and even less so how LRL's are supposed to work. The technology makes no sense, the scientific terms I've seen make no sense, and in some cases don't even exist. I am completely befuddled as to how a group of people in the age we live in today can believe in such nonsense.

Now, if every single dowser here gave the same explanation, then I could see where some of this is coming from. But, as you have seen, each dowser has a different story. This tells me that dowsing is not something that can be defined, which tells me, logically, that dowsing is not a real thing/trait/ability, but simply a mind game one plays with oneself.

Sorry Charlie.. that we are so more advanced mentally than you are. All in all it comes down to one thing. We find what we are looking for…..You can not explain why we locate what we are seeking….Sorry about but we do not look for Chad or pull tabs…Art

P.S...You are now back on "IGNORE"
 

I've read there are some people called "energy vampires". They suck your energy just by being around them. Most of these people do it unconsciously. Either way, don't be their vicitm.
 

Dell Winders said:
The answers have been provided, but are useless to a closed mind that chooses to supply your own interpretation, instead of practicing , and learning for your self.
Answers have been provided?!? Everyone gives different answers to the same question, most using patently incorrect scientific terms to somehow back their explanations up.

Dell Winders said:
If you believe you aren't capable of learning the techniques of this mental exercise, or don't want to learn, then you are doomed to failure before you try.
This is also patently incorrect. I have explained more than once here about my attempts to dowse. In fact (something else I have explained over and over) my very first post in the dowsing forum was quite inquisitive and open-minded. It was only after many posts that I began to realize that no one here had any idea what they were talking about.

And why do you guys insist on labeling everyone who doesn't believe in dowsing "close-minded?"

Dell Winders said:
There is no logical rationale, or excuse, for your continuous heckling and asinine remarks about Dowsers. If you don't wish to accept the answers that have been provided on this forum over the years, you certainly have had the option of looking elsewhere for the answers you seek, or keeping your antagonist comments about Dowsers to yourself.
I thought you guys hated using logic? That's what everyone here keeps telling me......

And again, why should I look for answers somewhere other than this place, where dozens of self-proclaimed "enlightened" dowsers hang out?

Dell Winders said:
LRL, and Directional Locators, which employ physics in their use, is Not a subject that is permitted to be discussed on TNET forums.
So why bring them up?? :icon_scratch:

Dell Winders said:
AF, If you wish to remain befuddled by the controlled use of your own sub-conscious mind to aid you in providing information to your conscious mind, that is your prerogative.
You can't control your subconscience mind, Dell, no matter what your new-agey friend Mike says....

Dell Winders said:
As one member of this forum, to another, I am asking respectively that you curb your disrespectful exercise of your right to free speech stop trying to harass and antagonize members of this forum who go out of their way to share their Dowsing experiences with you.
Once you guys can give me some rational explanation as to why dowsing could possibly be a real thing, I will....

You do realize, of course, that if everyone here would post in the "Dowsers Only" forum, you would never hear from me? But you don't......why is this? It's there just for you! And, as far as I can tell, you're the only group at Treasurenet that's been afforded this privilege. Why? Who knows, but I know that particular area was here before I ever showed up. Could it be, perhaps, because dowsers have a tendency to draw people like me? People that think rationally and can't bear to stand aside and watch people make up scientific-sounding terms and bandy them around like they had a right to do so?


Wait, you do have the right to do so! In fact, it's the same right you spoke of earlier, that one about free speech? Remember that one? So, it stands to reason that if you have the freedom to pull stuff straight out of the air and try to pass it off as a fact, then I also have the right to dispute what I know is incorrect.
 

Mike(Mont) said:
I've read there are some people called "energy vampires". They suck your energy just by being around them. Most of these people do it unconsciously. Either way, don't be their vicitm.
No, there is no such thing as an energy vampire.....

No, they don't suck energy.....

No, you can't be their victim.....

Where do you get this cr@p from, Mike?? ???
 

Dell Winders said:
LRL, and Directional Locators, which employ physics in their use, is Not a subject that is permitted to be discussed on TNET forums.
So why bring them up?? icon_scratch
Af, I see you have been busy editing and deleting remarks in your posts to deny responsibility for your actions. My LRL answer above was in direct reply to your comment about LRL.
I've done nothing of the sort, Dell, and you know it. Can you ever just tell the truth?
Dell Winders said:
Look, I cannot reconcile in my head, logically, how dowsing is supposed to work, and even less so how LRL's are supposed to work. The technology makes no sense, the scientific terms I've seen make no sense, and in some cases don't even exist. I am completely befuddled as to how a group of people in the age we live in today can believe in such nonsense.
For you to be dishonest of infering you never posted the comment about LRL is to show disrespect, and try to make me appear foolish, then I seem to have wasted my time posting answers for you.
Well, there's one of my quotes about LRL's right there, Dell! Didn't you just finish telling me I've edited my posts? Apologize now.

And the questions I've been directing towards you were referring almost completely to dowsing, not LRL's. Read the questions, Dell. Think before you speak.

Dell Winders said:
So tell me, how many months of daily practice have you devoted to learning to Dowse accurately that now makes you an expert to critize what others on this forum have trained their minds to do?
Not months, Dell, sessions. And I felt nothing. And these were sites where silver coins were found later with a detector. Again, if you don't read my posts then you can't very well comment on them, now can you?
Dell Winders said:
You can't control your subconscious mind, Dell
There you go, calling me a liar.
The conscious mind, has the ability to train the sub-conscious mind to our benefit, or ignore the comprehensive information it contains, as it appears to be your case. The unknown answers you seek can be found within your self, if you learn to consciously communicate with your sub-conscious. It's not new age ability. It's as old as mankind.
I'm not calling you a liar, science is. Read before you speak, Dell.
Dell Winders said:
And again, why should I look for answers somewhere other than this place, where dozens of self-proclaimed "enlightened" dowsers hang out?
That should be as obvious to you as it is to the rest of us? Because you complain you are not getting the answers you want to hear from us on this forum. So, if you want to learn, as you claim, why try to waste our time, and yours, with asinine remarks about dowsing, and folks who have learned to dowse, that are apparently intended to antagonize, and be disruptive.That's irrational. Is that the kind of behavior you call logical?
Again, read the posts, Dell. Everyone jumps all over my when I use logic. Not to mention the fact that (again, if you'll read) I tend to chime in when I see something that is clearly incorrect and ask for an explanation. Which I never get, by the way. It's been this way from the beginning. Someone would make a statement, I would ask for clarification, and they would just get all up-in-arms because they thought I was making fun of them. The truth is, they didn't have an explanation, because they didn't use logic or research in their answer in the first place.
Dell Winders said:
Once you guys can give me some rational explanation as to why dowsing could possibly be a real thing, I will....
O.K. Here's a rational explanation. Dowsing is real because it is being learned and exercised successfully by rational, intelligent people, of all educations, occupations, and walks of life, for thousands of years. What has already been done by man, can be done.
Seriously, Dell, do you have any other lines? This one is becoming quite meaningless. And you just saying that dowsing can be learned is not a rational explanation. Really, what don't you understand about the question? Why do you say dowsing is a real thing? What makes it work? What principle is it working under? Any real thing can be explained, Dell. Try it for yourself. Point to anything you see and research it. That object or idea has a history and an explanation behind it as to how it works. But not dowsing, as far as anyone here can tell......

Do yourself a favor. Mike wrote a couple of posts that I have responded to. In my responses, I have pointed out his incorrect information. Read them, and you can see the fallacies that fill these pages. I didn't know for certain that he was incorrect, but I did have an idea he was incorrect, so I simply did a few minutes of research and found that every source I ran into disagreed with his post, so I pointed this out to him.

Will he respond? Probably not. Will he modify his post because he was incorrect? Doubtful. Is he incorrect? Yes, but he will refuse to believe this since I wrote it and then he will refuse to do research of his own. He will stay willfully unaware of his mistakes, as will any other dowsers here that are corrected by anyone, but convince themselves that anyone who doesn't believe their "facts" are simply close-minded. You guys should be thanking me for trying to save you from believing incorrect information.
 

You can't control your subconscious mind, Dell

There you go, calling me a liar.
The conscious mind, has the ability to train the sub-conscious mind to our benefit, or ignore the comprehensive information it contains, as it appears to be your case. The unknown answers you seek can be found within your self, if you learn to consciously communicate with your sub-conscious. It's not new age ability. It's as old as mankind.

I'm not calling you a liar, science is. Read before you speak, Dell.

Please AF, give us some web sites that you keep referring to. Where does Science call us liars? I have asked for these sites for years and you tell me you don’t have to prove your statements. …Art
 

Dell Winders said:
Thank you for your apoogies. Perhaps you'll be more careful next time before you jump to conclusions??.....probably not, huh......

Not months, Dell, sessions. And I felt nothing. And these were sites where silver coins were found later with a detector. Again, if you don't read my posts then you can't very well comment on them, now can you?

WOW! I never realized in all my 75 years of life experience that you were supposed to "feel" something when you applied the mental use of your sub-conscious mind. What did you think you were supposed to "feel"? :D :D
There you go again, jumping to conclusions.

Ask Art, ask Mike, ask any other number of dowsers here who go on and on about the feelings they get when dowsing. I understood that I was to feel something when dowsing by reading the posts of members here. I didn't just make this up, Dell, as you like to do. This came straight from other dowsers. If you want to mock someone, mock them.

Dell Winders said:
You can't control your subconscious mind, Dell

There you go, calling me a liar.
The conscious mind, has the ability to train the sub-conscious mind to our benefit, or ignore the comprehensive information it contains, as it appears to be your case. The unknown answers you seek can be found within your self, if you learn to consciously communicate with your sub-conscious. It's not new age ability. It's as old as mankind.

I'm not calling you a liar, science is. Read before you speak, Dell.

Science is calling me a liar? How irresponsible. Are you crazy? The post calling me a liar has your name on it.
I don't think you can actually be this obtuse, Dell....... Maybe you can...... Go ahead, pretend you don't understand whay I'm saying. Ign0rance is bliss, right?

Dell Winders said:
Again, read the posts, Dell. Everyone jumps all over my when I use logic.

What logic are you using? I haven't seen any from you on the subject of the abilities and uses of the human mind? Dowsing/meta physics.
All I've seen is your prejudiced attitude and personal insults towards dowsers.
Here's a pretty common definition of logic:
Logic is the study of the principles of valid demonstration and inference. The word derives from Greek λογική (logike), fem. of λογικός (logikos), "possessed of reason, intellectual, dialectical, argumentative", from λόγος logos, "word, thought, idea, argument, account, reason, or principle".

I have consistently used reason in my thoughts towards dowsing. I rely on basic scientific principles in these arguments. I've always hoped to see a valid demonstration of dowsing, but this has never materialized. Does all of this scare you, Dell, because....welcome to the wonderful world of Logic!!

Dell Winders said:
Seriously, Dell, do you have any other lines? This one is becoming quite meaningless. And you just saying that dowsing can be learned is not a rational explanation. Really, what don't you understand about the question? Why do you say dowsing is a real thing? What makes it work? What principle is it working under? Any real thing can be explained, Dell. Try it for yourself. Point to anything you see and research it. That object or idea has a history and an explanation behind it as to how it works. But not dowsing, as far as anyone here can tell......

Well that's not true. The workings of the human mind, or brain, has yet to be explained with definitive answers. I have not studied the human brain, so I cannot explain what makes Dowsing work, but it does indeed work for those who devote the time and practice to learn. That's a true fact of my life's experience.

No one here is is qualified, or equipped to seriously study brain wave activity so it's only logical that no one here can answer the questions you demand we answer. So, do your own research elsewhere to find the answers you seek, and quit complaining because we don't tell you what you want to hear. You are not being realistic in your expectations of others.
The term true fact is so very overused by dowsers.....why is this Dell?

And if you truly believe everything you've written above, then how can you claim that the conscience mind can control the subconscience mind? Also, how can you claim that I've been told exactly how dowsing works if no one here is qualified to tell me?

Wow, three posts and I already have you contradicting yourself..... :tard:

Dell Winders said:
Do yourself a favor. Mike wrote a couple of posts that I have responded to. In my responses, I have pointed out his incorrect information. Read them, and you can see the fallacies that fill these pages. I didn't know for certain that he was incorrect, but I did have an idea he was incorrect, so I simply did a few minutes of research and found that every source I ran into disagreed with his post, so I pointed this out to him.

Will he respond? Probably not. Will he modify his post because he was incorrect? Doubtful. Is he incorrect? Yes, but he will refuse to believe this since I wrote it and then he will refuse to do research of his own. He will stay willfully unaware of his mistakes, as will any other dowsers here that are corrected by anyone, but convince themselves that anyone who doesn't believe their "facts" are simply close-minded. You guys should be thanking me for trying to save you from believing incorrect information.

You are so full of pompous BS, and as much of a contributor of mis-information and questionable fact as anyone. Who gives a rats a$$ about your complaints about Mike.

This is the last I hope to respond to your replies. I suggest that when you try to lump everybody together as, "You guys", that you add a disclaimer that excludes Dell Winders, from your prejudiced inferences as I am no longer tolerant of your inferences that I am untruthful. Dell
You just love to think this, don't you Dell? Do you have low self-seteem, is that it?

You didn't bother to look at those posts, so you'll never know that Mike was the one contributing mis-information, and I was the one giving the correct information. You'll never know this, because it frightens you to think that you might be wrong. God forbid a dowser say something wrong, huh? They're all so enlightened and open-minded, there's no possible way.

It's a good thing you're in Florida, Dell. There's a ton of sand there to bury your head in.
 

aarthrj3811 said:
You can't control your subconscious mind, Dell

Please AF, give us some web sites that you keep referring to. Where does Science call us liars? I have asked for these sites for years and you tell me you don’t have to prove your statements. …Art
Show me one time you've asked for a link to a website about the subconscience mind, and I'll oblige your request, Art. Also, please show me where I've told you I don't have to prove my statements.
.
.
.
.
....wait, how did you even read my post? You had me blocked, remember? :tard: :tard: :tard: :tard: :tard: :tard:
 

Show me one time you've asked for a link to a website about the subconscience mind, and I'll oblige your request, Art. Also, please show me where I've told you I don't have to prove my statements.
.
.
.
.
....wait, how did you even read my post? You had me blocked, remember?

Just had to see what you were arguing about….I ask you to prove your statement..Same as always you ask us for the prove…..Art
 

aarthrj3811 said:
Show me one time you've asked for a link to a website about the subconscience mind, and I'll oblige your request, Art. Also, please show me where I've told you I don't have to prove my statements.
.
.
.
.
....wait, how did you even read my post? You had me blocked, remember?

Just had to see what you were arguing about….I ask you to prove your statement..Same as always you ask us for the prove…..Art
Regardless of why you were reading my posts, can you please point out where you have asked for this information before? I only ask because, I honestly don't remember discussing the subconscience mind with you before.
 

You look as I am tired of wasting my time…Art
 

aarthrj3811 said:
You look as I am tired of wasting my time…Art
So you want me to prove your statements for you, Art? Seriously? You want me to go back and look for something that I don't remember saying to prove your point for you? Are you truly that lazy??
 

Dell Winders said:
I have consistently used reason in my thoughts towards dowsing. I rely on basic scientific principles in these arguments. I've always hoped to see a valid demonstration of dowsing, but this has never materialized. Does all of this scare you, Dell, because....welcome to the wonderful world of Logic!!
O.K. Af, if you are the Scientific expert on Dowsing, show me the conclusive Scientific studies that state that humans are not capable of psychic ability, and that psychic ability is not centered within the sub-conscious part of our brain?
I've proven many times in front of witnesses the positive results of Mental, meta-physical Dowsing from great distances.. I posted true examples for you to see. Yet, you continue to infer that I am not doing as I say I am doing? Why is that?
If you can't accept this established fact, then your wonderful world of imaginary logic is seriously flawed. Dell

Now, didn't you, or some other dowser here, once tell me that dowsing is not psychic? So it is a psychic ability? Really?

Then you'll have to take that up with Art and Mike and the rest of the guys here, since they all claim that dowsing happens when a material in the ground somehow transmits it's location to their dowsing rods. Or their heads, or something. This whole thing is so convoluted it's tough to remember how many times each of you has contradicted yourselves and your fellow dowsers.

And you call me a "Scientific expert on Dowsing" do you? But, earlier, didn't you say that no one here understands the subconscience so we can't possibly explain dowsing? Which includes you, I assume? That is what you meant when you said this, "I have not studied the human brain, so I cannot explain what makes Dowsing work..." right?

But, oddly enough, you have attempted to explain dowsing many times. How could you have done this, when you don't understand it at all?? :icon_scratch:

And as far as you telling me stories about your great dowsing adventures, you can't tell anyone what's actually happening when you dowse, which causes your stories to be a bit unbelievable. How can stories like this be taken with more than a grain of salt when you have dowsers giving you explanations about dowsing like these:

Inert metals in the ground decay and sends out a signal that the dowsing rod responds to.
Your body gives off waves of energy that bounce off gold in the ground and reflect back to a dowsing rod.
Dowsing is a psychic ability.
If you stick a film canister with a silver dime in it on your dowsing rod, the rod will point to other silver miles away.
The Earth itself is resonating, which in turn causes gold in the ground to resonate, which in turn makes a signal that a dowsing rod can sense.

I'm not calling you a liar, no matter what you want everyone reading this to believe. You're only trying to discredit me. It's a trait common among dowsers; something I've discovered. Discredit the naysayers so the incredulous tales the dowsers tell seem more believeable. But if you call someone a liar without proof, you're no better for it, trust me.

You've really gotten down to the meat of this subject. No one understands dowsing, right? You've said this so I'll take you at your word. But, if this is true, and you never lie or stretch the truth so it must be, then why do so many people attempt to explain how it works? And in their explanations they use scientific terms, terms which are without fail used incorrectly. But when they do this, it discredits the dowsers, because the terms they've used are invariably used incorrectly, and proof of this is available to anyone who takes the time to do any reading.

Of course, when this is pointed out to a dowser, they simply revert back to the old standbys of "close-minded" and "science will prove me right someday" and "you don't understand because you're a negative person." When, in fact, all this other person did was to show then that they were using scientific terms incorrectly.

Dowsers have given themselves a negative reputation by doing this. You can't tell me you're surprised by this, though, can you Dell? You've proven this yourself with the post I'm responding to. When you've run out of false explanations, you just ask for proof that you are well aware doesn't exist to justify your point of view. I could show you psychic studies all day long that show humans aren't capable of psychic abilities, but you'll just tell me that the studies were flawed because they chose the wrong people, or they performed the wrong type of test. Then you'll produce a test by some group with dubious credentials. A group, most likely, that has some stake or will profit from, producing a test that show positive results. The irony of the fact that this study has never been duplicated will miss your limited field of vision, and you'll go on thinking that you're absolutely correct.

Do you want to know what you really believe you're correct, Dell? It's because your mental blinders keep you from seeing anything you don't want to see. I could produce hundreds of studies and you'll ignore them all, because you don't want to see them.
 

The term subconscious is defined as existing or operating in the mind beneath or beyond conscious awareness. The word was coined by the psychologist Pierre Janet, who credited it with a hidden level of awareness and automatism. In the strict psychological sense, the adjective is defined as "operating or existing outside of consciousness". The term also appears in Sigmund Freud's very early work, to denote the unconscious mind but was soon eliminated due to its ambiguity. It may also be used to describe the preconscious, information contained in the mind, which although not presently in the conscious, may be recalled by "directing attention to them", such as memories not being recalled at present, but still available to be recalled at will. Use of the term "subconscious" is avoided in academic settings despite remaining popular in common use.

Operating beneath or beyond concious awareness.......hmmmmm......
______________________________________________

In a recent experiment, psychologists at Yale altered people’s judgments of a stranger by handing them a cup of coffee.

The study participants, college students, had no idea that their social instincts were being deliberately manipulated. On the way to the laboratory, they had bumped into a laboratory assistant, who was holding textbooks, a clipboard, papers and a cup of hot or iced coffee — and asked for a hand with the cup.

That was all it took: The students who held a cup of iced coffee rated a hypothetical person they later read about as being much colder, less social and more selfish than did their fellow students, who had momentarily held a cup of hot java.


The subconcious mind can make erroneous conclusions.....hmmmmm.......
______________________________________________

sub·con·scious /sʌbˈkɒnʃəs/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[suhb-kon-shuhs] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective
1. existing or operating in the mind beneath or beyond consciousness: the subconscious self. Compare preconscious, unconscious.
2. imperfectly or not wholly conscious: subconscious motivations.
3. the totality of mental processes of which the individual is not aware; unreportable mental activities.


Apparently a person is unaware of subconscious thought.......hmmmmm......
______________________________________________

Of course, there are plenty of sites that want you to believe you can control your subconscious mind, but they were all trying to sell something, so I immediately discounted them. There are also plenty of sites that offer to teach you how to manipulate someone else's subconscious thinking. Since others aren't in control of their subconscious mind, these sites were more believeable.

Bottom line, you can't control your subconscious mind, although others can direct it without your knowledge.

And, oddly enough, any of you could have done this before incorrectly stating that you can control your subconscious mind, but you didn't. Yet another example of how speaking without thinking can prove troublesome.
 

Dell, please read this entire post. I give you the respect of reading yours completely, please do the same for mine.
Dell Winders said:
Af, After reading your confusing narrative, I have to agree that you are totally befuddled. What a difficult challenge in understanding dowsing it must be for you. I accept that you are confused, and have tried to provide some insight from my own dowsing experience. but failed to communicate.

I'll not waste any more time arguing with you, and any further inferences and innuendo's you make about the character of folks who enjoy, and practice Dowsing, will only be discussed with the moderator. Dell
I wrote it as plainly as I could, Dell. It's in English, I didn't use very many big words. Is it because I spoke logically? Is that what confuses you?? Or is it the fact that I used so many terms I have learned from the other dowsers here? Because, trust me, they are confusing, apparently to both of us.

But to speak of inferences and innuendos, this is comething you can hardly accuse me of. Read your own posts, Dell. You refer to skeptics as close-minded, unintelligent, incapable of learning, etc, etc. And why? Because skeptics don't believe that metals put off signals that coat hangers can receive, or that all dowsers are psychic......?

That's the real reason behind of all this, isn't it? We don't just blindly believe you?

No one, in all the time I've been posting here, has been able to explain dowsing without using real scientific terms incorrectly, or by using pseudoscientific terms. Why is this necessary? If dowsing is a real science, a real ability, any dowser should be able to explain what it is they are doing.

If you're tired of my questions, Dell, you have plenty of options. You can stop answering me, you could post in the pro-dowsing forum, or you could supply a reasonable explanation.

I shall reiterate for your edification. I came here looking for answers, and I got answers. But, the answers didn't make sense to my rational, logical mind. So, after I got a few answers, I started doing some research and found that a lot of the information I was given was scientifically incorrect. So, I started to question this information, and people got angry with me. No one explained to me why they were angry I was questioning these illogical answers. Instead they started to call me close-minded because I was confused by the contradictory information I was being given.

In a way, it's your own fault that I'm even here. If anyone right up front would have said that dowsing was just a fun way to pass the time, it would have stopped there. But I was told that people are able to find tiny gold nuggets that are buried 2 feet deep and are 300 feet away, and then they tried to use scientific-sounding terms which I already knew to be incorrect.
 

This forum is limited to the discussion of simple, inexpensive (or FREE!) devices and techniques. That means NO discussion of electrical devices of any kind.? Feel free to discuss L-rods, Spanish dip needles, map dowsing, and other dowsing related subjects.

Because of past experience with similar forums, I will not have much patience in the forum, so if you veer off topic you just might find your post deleted and your permissions restricted. If you have some constructive information to share about dowsing then great, feel free to post!!? ?If you want to post just to toot your own horn or to sneak in links to your long range locator website, then beware - I am ready to ban you! PERMANENTLY!

Thanks,
Marc Austin
webmaster@treasurenet.com
Discussion
part of Software Engineering for Internet Applications by Eve Andersson, Philip Greenspun, and Andrew Grumet; revised February 2005
________________________________________
A discussion forum is one of the most basic tools for computer-supported cooperation among human beings. User A can post a question. User B can post an answer. User C can view both question and answer and learn from the exchange. In a threaded forum, User D has the choice of posting a response to User A's question or to User B's response. In a Q&A format forum, Users D, E, and F can post responses to User A's question, and the responses will simply be presented in the order that they were submitted. With minor tweaks to the presentation layer, a discussion forum system can function as a personal commentable weblog.
In this chapter you'll prototype a discussion forum, conduct a usability test, and then refine your system based on what you learned from observing the users.
 

Hey bigm…..I don’t know where the signal lines come from or how they were created. I just know how to find them and find what they come from. I do know that it is a fact when the space weather is in the red, my rods respond to the signal line with greater force than they do normaly…All information is greatly appreciated…Art
 

Bigm, that's the same article I read when I made the "Magnetic Portals" thread post. The whole thing about solar magnetic energy is it disrupts the earth's magnetic field. Usually it will squeeze it so the flux lines move closer together. What happens is anything conductive that is in the path of these moving flux lines will produce a charge. Iron in particular takes on a charge that will overpower most dowsing devices. So yes, the rods will move but they move to iron as well as gold, and there's a lot more iron.

In the past, many people believed you could just get a solar wind forecast as the solar wind takes three days to get to earth. Not so with the magnetic portals. They can arrive at any time and distrupt things. For years Dell haas talked about disruptions caused by solar energy. Many people did not believe him. Also remember that the dowser has an electrical field around his/her body and it acts as a sensor.

Solar magnetic activity can also affect the brain. It can mimick brain wave frequencies and this only takes extremely small amounts of energy, like one-thousandth the earth's field. These can produce psychic events within the person. Massive amounts of solar energy actually have less of an effect on the mental dowsing.

As for the magnetic portals working to produce signal lines on a micro level, most dowsers know that the energy travels along the flux lines as a carrier wave. Nothing new here.
 

Mike
Maybe that was why back in the eighties I could do lrd (over twen ty miles and go right to a river rock (mostly iron) which was giving me a gold signal, and oncew it was unearthed the reading went away
bigm
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom