What's new

slim pickins this year

Pipster

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2007
Messages
177
Reaction score
26
Golden Thread
0
Location
Quinlan TX
Detector(s) used
Whites MXT, CTX 3030
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
so though i have not had a lot of time to run through halves this year i have managed to do 13 boxes and for that effort i have 1-90% and 2 40% not as good this year for me hope ya'll are killing it
PIP
 
Upvote 0
hey PIP, I feel your pain here too... 20 boxes or so searched this year, 4 silvers to show for it.
 
for the first time EVER! a bank today had halves - 20$ worth MWR skunk :( atleast i got to touch halves
 
Better than me. I haven't even touched a roll this year. Had a baby on the 9th of jan. and been way to busy.
 
Well I got my first box of halves and got skunked. Maybe I will have better luck with 2 boxes of dimes. Good luck to all
 
I think its been rough for all of us. But by the grace of God we are persevering!
 
A lot less here too. I'm too lazy to be hitting the dimes like I used to. Besides that, I'm having fun buying small silver collections and accumulating so much more than I could by roll hunting alone.
 
Well I got my first box of halves and got skunked. Maybe I will have better luck with 2 boxes of dimes. Good luck to all

Why revive this older thread?
 
Why revive a 5 day old thread to ask why revive an old thread?

I don't see a problem with 5 day old threads. But a month old, I would not revive unless there is good reason.
 
Is that the TOS?
 
Come on now Sagittarius, please don't jump on people for reviving older threads, it's a privately owned forum by TNET, They have no rules against bumping old threads...
I don't see a problem with 5 day old threads. But a month old, I would not revive unless there is good reason.
 
I don't have problems with reviving a month old thread; I've been out of the country for longer than that, and would need time to catch up. Six months or a year is excessive IMO.
 
Why revive this older thread?

from this thread: http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/c...6-sold-899-40-halves-monday-roll-hunting.html

New Members should be restrained from bringing up topics that are six years old.....:BangHead:

I disagree. If something constructive is to be said, than it could be beneficial. All of us were New Members at one time, and you can see who some of us became, veterans, or just people with great advice. Also, you don't suddenly change after having 10 posts, so it really wouldn't have to just be New Members, but also Tenderfoots, which restricts the freedom of posting here on Tnet.

:laughing7::laughing7::laughing7:
 
Last edited:
I was trying to say that new members shouldn't be banned from reviving threads, since it may serve a purpose. However, many times it is pointless.

After all, when do you say that a member is no longer "new?" 50 posts, 100 posts?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom