So how old is planet Earth today?

Duckshot

Silver Member
Sep 8, 2014
4,455
9,643
trapped on the earthly plane of causation
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

DizzyDigger

Gold Member
Dec 9, 2012
5,853
11,603
Concrete, WA
Detector(s) used
Nokta FoRs Gold, a Gold Cube, 2 Keene Sluices and Lord only knows how many pans....not to mention a load of other gear my wife still doesn't know about!
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
12.5 billion is close to age of the Universe itself, as it has been calculated
to be roughly 13.8 billion years old.

The Earth and our Solar System is considered to be about 4.5 Billion years old.
 

newnan man

Gold Member
Aug 8, 2005
5,281
16,626
Beautiful Florida
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
I wonder how they come up with those figures & is the scientific community on board? Smarter people than myself that's for sure.
 

DizzyDigger

Gold Member
Dec 9, 2012
5,853
11,603
Concrete, WA
Detector(s) used
Nokta FoRs Gold, a Gold Cube, 2 Keene Sluices and Lord only knows how many pans....not to mention a load of other gear my wife still doesn't know about!
Primary Interest:
Prospecting

Charlie P. (NY)

Gold Member
Feb 3, 2006
13,004
17,108
South Central Upstate NY in the foothills of the h
Detector(s) used
Minelab Musketeer Advantage Pro w/8" & 10" DD coils/Fisher F75se(Upgraded to LTD2) w/11" DD, 6.5" concentric & 9.5" NEL Sharpshooter DD coils/Sunray FX-1 Probe & F-Point/Black Widows/Rattler headphone
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Depends at what point you consider a planet "born". It was a ring of material orbiting the Sun that separated into what accreted and compressed into the current planets; though at least one appears to have failed and become the asteroid belt.

DizzyDigger's 4.5 billion years is the age we can tell the molten planet was basically sable enough to start cooling. 4.4 billion years ago it is thought something smacked the Earth and that is what led to the formation of our single moon.

How do they come up with the age? Once molten rock crystalizes the isotopes in it start to decay at known rates. Some, like Rubidium 87 have a VERY long half life. In the order of 49,000,000,000 years. Rb 86 has a half-life of days so that decays rapidly. But Rubidium 85 is stable. So if you compare the amount of Rb 87 to the amount of Rb 85 in a matrix you can estimate the age of the sample.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldest_dated_rocks
 

jeff of pa

Super Moderator
Staff member
Dec 19, 2003
85,892
59,682
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
approximately 65 years 5 months 28 days old according to my calculations.

the rest is all conjecture and taking other peoples word for it
 

Last edited:

Red-Coat

Gold Member
Dec 23, 2019
5,253
16,472
Surrey, UK
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
The generally accepted estimate for the age of Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years. However, as already said, planetary formation is an evolutionary process over a period of time and this date probably corresponds to the accretion/core formation of the nebular material from which Earth as we know it evolved.

We don’t rely completely on isotopic analysis of the materials available to us on Earth. Most samples are unable to give us a direct date for formation because our Earth has undergone subsequent differentiation into core, mantle and crust followed by mixing and unmxing through plate tectonics, weathering and hydrothermal circulation

Those processes can skew isotopic dating mechanisms, for which you need a ‘closed system’ where the parent or daughter nuclide (characterised by the number of neutrons and protons an atom contains) has been unaffected through time. Probably the closest we can come to that are samples of Archaean lead ore (galena) which are the earliest homogeneous lead-lead isotope systems that we know of on our planet. Those have returned dates of 4.54 billion years ± 1%

In addition to multiple sampling on Earth, we also use evidence from meteorites to corroborate our estimates. Certain meteorite types represent undifferentiated and pristine material from which the accreting solar disk was formed and consequently yield dates with higher degrees of scientific reliability.

The most primitive meteorites also help us to date the solar system itself. Some primitive carbonaceous meteorites contain what are known as ‘calcium–aluminium-rich inclusions’ (CAIs). These are the oldest known materials to have existed in solid form following the solar nebula that generated the building blocks for our planetary systems. We don’t have a huge amount of data but analyses so far have given a weighted mean age for CAIs of 4.567.30 billion years ± 0.004% and that’s currently taken to be the age of our Solar System prior to planetary accretion.
 

OP
OP
D

Duckshot

Silver Member
Sep 8, 2014
4,455
9,643
trapped on the earthly plane of causation
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
approximately 65 years 5 months 28 days old according to my calculations.

the rest is all conjecture and taking other peoples word for it

That's actually a good answer IMO, so long as you don't get caught up is solipsism.

The thing is a million years is long time. A billion is a thousand million.

I found an intersting article on dark matter, in ScientificAmerican iirc. The recent data collected suggest that the therory of relativity needs tweaking.

There are a bunch of assumptions made in the estimates of age from radiologic dating. One of these is that the physics found on earth is constant throughout both galaxy. Another is that decay of isotopes is constant over enormous spans of time. Kind of arrogant assumptions IMO. The estimate might be correct. But it could be totally wrong.
 

Charlie P. (NY)

Gold Member
Feb 3, 2006
13,004
17,108
South Central Upstate NY in the foothills of the h
Detector(s) used
Minelab Musketeer Advantage Pro w/8" & 10" DD coils/Fisher F75se(Upgraded to LTD2) w/11" DD, 6.5" concentric & 9.5" NEL Sharpshooter DD coils/Sunray FX-1 Probe & F-Point/Black Widows/Rattler headphone
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
And the beauty of science is that whatever solution is best supported will be the revised version.

We have no evidence that physics and natural law is a local phenomena so it's a safe bet it works through-out our solar system, if not this whole spiral-arm region of the galaxy. Nearer the galactic core - all bets are off until we get more data and that's where the elegant theories start filling in.

Astonishingly Voyager 1 (launched in 1977) is still transmitting data back to Earth. New info this month on interstellar density fluctuations in the "vacuum" of space. Its the furthest we have physically probed away from "home". Just over 14 billion miles away and still going.

The nearest non-solar orbit planet is 24,900,000,000,000 miles away (Proxima Centauri). So, if Voyager 1 was headed that way it would take 78,257 years (assuming no deceleration) to reach our nearest neighbor.

Kind of sad we'll likely never leave our solar-system . . . unless someone figures how to achieve and survive alternative travel methods.
 

Last edited:

Tony in SC

Gold Member
Jun 8, 2006
6,113
8,465
Upstate South Carolina
Detector(s) used
Whites, Minelab, Tesoro, and custom machines
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
A young couple came out to the farm the other day. When they were leaving the lady said I love your place have you lived here all your life? My answer was. "I don't know yet".
approximately 65 years 5 months 28 days old according to my calculations.

the rest is all conjecture and taking other peoples word for it
 

Trezurehunter

Gold Member
Mar 22, 2003
17,886
21,512
Illinois / Oklahoma
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
8
Detector(s) used
Minelab Equinox 800 - Fisher CZ 5
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
If those numbers are true, then I feel like I'm as old as Planet Earth !
 

TooManyHobbies

Bronze Member
Dec 24, 2007
1,935
2,015
CT
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
2
Detector(s) used
Whites MXT,
DetectorPro HH Underwater
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
approximately 65 years 5 months 28 days old according to my calculations.

the rest is all conjecture and taking other peoples word for it

Then it's at least 10 years older than I can confirm.
 

Clad2Silver

Bronze Member
Jul 17, 2018
2,059
5,683
Eastern Connecticut
Detector(s) used
Garrett AT Max/ Garrett AT Pro/ Garrett Ace 400/ Garrett Pro Pointer 2 / Garrett Z-Lynk AT Propointer
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
What difference does it make?
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top