Some my stones with test data

[Naukoveckiy]

Hi.. they did an analysis on some of my stones.. below is a photo and a test.
What do you think?

sorry. I don't know how to put it in order..
in general, one set is two photos.. stone and analysis. that is, photos 1 and 2 are the 1st stone. Photos 3 and 4 are the 2nd stone. The last stone has two test photos

Damn, I can see it normally on the preview. But on the website you display the 9th photo from the 1st photo.
photo with stone 9 refers to the last two spectral measurements

18:46 - I figured out how to organize photos


and today (30.11) I noticed that the 9th stone and the 4th are either the same or the same thing. and it has nickel.
and 6 and 8 were thought to be either copper-based or nickel-based. Neither one nor the other

old topic about these stones with photos etc.:

Very strange samples

Hello. Haven't visited the forum for a long time But I didn’t stop looking in my spare time For beginners - if you want to know more, make a cut of your findings and look inside it) Meteorites are not always magnetic. my some beautifull stones, maybe some from space maybe some after great...

www.treasurenet.com

 

[Naukoveckiy]

Hi.. they did an analysis on some of my stones.. below is a photo and a test.
What do you think?

sorry. I don't know how to put it in order..
in general, one set is two photos.. stone and analysis. that is, photos 1 and 2 are the 1st stone. Photos 3 and 4 are the 2nd stone. The last stone has two test photos

they look different... they are the same in composition but in different proportions.
considering that the one with the black veins is shaped like a bullet... I'll try to take a photo like that later

🔎 UNIDENTIFIED - Chrysocolla or the Moon? Ukraine

Oh, hello to the people of this forum thread)... I thought maybe this would be easier. I thought maybe it was extraterrestrial, and for example shock veins of olivine. But there was also an opinion that it was Chrysocolla.

www.treasurenet.com

 

[Naukoveckiy]

Hi.. they did an analysis on some of my stones.. below is a photo and a test.
What do you think?

sorry. I don't know how to put it in order..
in general, one set is two photos.. stone and analysis. that is, photos 1 and 2 are the 1st stone. Photos 3 and 4 are the 2nd stone. The last stone has two test photos

I used to think he looked like that Gourara 003

Gourara 003
Classification: HED achondrite (Eucrite, monomict)
History:...
Physical characteristics: Fragments of the single broken stone display an extremely fresh, black glossy fusion crust. Certain fragments display radial flowlines, rollover lip, and regmaglypts. A slice of the interior reveals a brecciated sample with an assortment of light and dark clasts set in a finer-grained matrix.
Petrography: (D. Sheikh, FSU) Specimen is a monomict breccia consisting of eucrite lithic clasts exhibiting primarily diabasic textures (grain size 800 µm, up to 3 mm) set in a fine-grained clastic matrix of similar lithology with approximately 50% pyroxene, 45% plagioclase, 4% opaques, and 1% shock-melt veins. Mineral phases include pigeonite (most displaying exsolution lamellae of varying width; some inverted to orthopyroxene), augite (some exsolved from pigeonite), orthopyroxene, calcic plagioclase (display both polysynthetic and carlsbad twinning under cross-polarized light), ilmenite, chromite (some Ti-rich), and SiO2-rich glass.
Geochemistry: Orthopyroxene (Fs51.5±1.9Wo4.9±0.7, range Fs48.5-55.0Wo3.6-5.7, FeO/MnO = 31±4, n=15), Pigeonite (Fs50.7±1.3Wo7.4±1.2, range Fs47.9-53.3Wo6.1-10.8, FeO/MnO = 32±4, n=26), Augite (Fs27.7±3.4Wo37.7±4.6, range Fs21.3-33.9Wo27.1-42.3, FeO/MnO = 28±4, n=8), Calcic Plagioclase (An91.6±1.2, range An88.7-94.2, n=42).
Classification: HED Achondrite (Eucrite, monomict breccia).
Specimens: ...

Meteoritical Bulletin: Entry for Gourara 003

 

[Naukoveckiy]

Hi.. they did an analysis on some of my stones.. below is a photo and a test.
What do you think?

sorry. I don't know how to put it in order..
in general, one set is two photos.. stone and analysis. that is, photos 1 and 2 are the 1st stone. Photos 3 and 4 are the 2nd stone. The last stone has two test photos

Damn, I can see it normally on the preview. But on the website you display the 9th photo from the 1st photo.
photo with stone 9 refers to the last two spectral measurements

18:46 - I figured out how to organize photos


and today (30.11) I noticed that the 9th stone and the 4th are either the same or the same thing. and it has nickel.
and 4 and 6 were thought to be either copper-based or nickel-based. Neither one nor the other

response from our meteoritic institute:
We sincerely thank you for your interest in meteorites and the data you sent, but we have to disappoint you. All the analyses were performed incorrectly, because for such samples it is necessary to do a chemical analysis taking into account oxygen. Therefore, unfortunately, we will not be able to use them for diagnostics.

 

[Naukoveckiy]

Hi.. they did an analysis on some of my stones.. below is a photo and a test.
What do you think?

sorry. I don't know how to put it in order..
in general, one set is two photos.. stone and analysis. that is, photos 1 and 2 are the 1st stone. Photos 3 and 4 are the 2nd stone. The last stone has two test photos

Damn, I can see it normally on the preview. But on the website you display the 9th photo from the 1st photo.
photo with stone 9 refers to the last two spectral measurements

18:46 - I figured out how to organize photos


and today (30.11) I noticed that the 9th stone and the 4th are either the same or the same thing. and it has nickel.
and 6 and 8 were thought to be either copper-based or nickel-based. Neither one nor the other

old topic about these stones with photos etc.:

Very strange samples

Hello. Haven't visited the forum for a long time But I didn’t stop looking in my spare time For beginners - if you want to know more, make a cut of your findings and look inside it) Meteorites are not always magnetic. my some beautifull stones, maybe some from space maybe some after great...

www.treasurenet.com

hi. it's clear that this is all indirect... BUT here are a few hints:
- 3:48 min. -1st foto
compare with sample 4(2nd foto) and 9 etc.

- 10:42 min. -3nd foto
compare with sample 4 and 9 etc.