What's new

Some say True and some say false...

treasure1822

Hero Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2010
Messages
591
Reaction score
262
Golden Thread
0
There are some that say the Beale Papers are true and some say a hoax...What if they are both right? What if a actual treasure exist in a fictional story? What if there is some truth within those words and lies to confuse..."Man can be lead down bad or false paths, and I know man"...Assumption is mans greatest downfall, and will lead to his failure..."A man is like a wheelbarrow, more effective when pushed". January 4th 1822...January 5th 1822...why two letters 1 day apart?
 
Sounds like it would give me a headache if ya think about it too much.. :laughing7:
 
Sounds like it would give me a headache if ya think about it too much.. :laughing7:
Haven't you ever watched a Sherlock Homes move and found the answer before it's revealed...All the clues are before you, you just need to solve...Elementary my dear Watson...
 
There are some that say the Beale Papers are true and some say a hoax...What if they are both right? What if an actual treasure exist in a fictional story? What if there is some truth within those words and lies to confuse..."Man can be lead down bad or false paths, and I know man"...Assumption is mans greatest downfall, and will lead to his failure..."A man is like a wheelbarrow, more effective when pushed". January 4th 1822...January 5th 1822...why two letters 1 day apart?
This is 100% correct and I have used this exact logic to formulate my entire hypothesis. I believe the Beale letter is an allegory. A highly sophisticated one that uses human nature and misdirection to feed the public a narrative while the truth in the lie is laid bare for the initiated (the heirs) to see. Unfortunately it was so clever that it’s remained a mystery for 140-200 years.
 
What Legend or story do these Papers refer to ? Whereabouts is it assumed to be?
 
I’ll put that in print soon. Submitting it to a historical review board. For the purposes of now, it’s centered in St. Louis, MO

How about you?
 
I’ll put that in print soon. Submitting it to a historical review board. For the purposes of now, it’s centered in St. Louis, MO

How about you?
I am NE of you. North Chicagoland to be precise and I am a pendulist.
I can triangulate a small/ mini treasure in very little time. As little as 4 hours.
And that includes the random walking through vast unknown area.
The size is not always easy to infer through my method or other dowsing analyses.
But as the physicists, spiritualists and other dowsers have discussed here before, almost every treasure is guarded by " evil forces " , spells, the desire of the now dead owner who buried it ,never to be found.....
I have penetrated the protective " sheath " of several treasures, but again i don't got " Green light " from above yet.
 
I am more concerned about the price of eggs in india...
 
Haven't you ever watched a Sherlock Homes move and found the answer before it's revealed...All the clues are before you, you just need to solve...Elementary my dear Watson...

False. You’ve been watching too many movies. Holmes never said either of those phrases in Conan Doyle’s original stories. They’re later inventions by script-writers. He frequently said "Exactly, my dear Watson" and also came close with "You see, but you do not observe. The distinction is clear" in “A Scandal in Bohemia”. In that same book he also said: "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts."
 
False. You’ve been watching too many movies. Holmes never said either of those phrases in Conan Doyle’s original stories. They’re later inventions by script-writers. He frequently said "Exactly, my dear Watson" and also came close with "You see, but you do not observe. The distinction is clear" in “A Scandal in Bohemia”. In that same book he also said: "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts."
But it is you who twist the "facts" to suit the theory...you have just given the "clue", a script writer. Why did TJB go to so much detail on where he didn't hide the treasure but vague enough not to give it's name?
 
But it is you who twist the "facts" to suit the theory...you have just given the "clue", a script writer. Why did TJB go to so much detail on where he didn't hide the treasure but vague enough not to give it's name?
Laugh all you want but answer the question...
 
But it is you who twist the "facts" to suit the theory...you have just given the "clue", a script writer. Why did TJB go to so much detail on where he didn't hide the treasure but vague enough not to give it's name?

Laugh all you want but answer the question...

Because the whole thing is a historical hoax and there is no treasure.
 
That wasn't the question, why did he say it was a place where farmers store their sweet potatoes? What is another name for that? In a excavation or vault six feet below the surface of the ground...
 
That wasn't the question, why did he say it was a place where farmers store their sweet potatoes? What is another name for that? In a excavation or vault six feet below the surface of the ground...

My answer would be the same nevertheless. That none of it leads to treasure because the whole thing is a historical hoax of made-up nonsense.

Another common name for a potato store is a root cellar. Depending on the context and region, it can also be referred to as a potato cellar, potato house, potato barn, or an underground potato clamp (or grave). [ref: Wikipedia]
 
Beales codes are nothing more than fiction.

From Franklin:

B-1.webp
 
Root cellar is correct...but you are wrong, that nonsence leads to a treasure...man can be lead down bad or false paths...

I'm only proven wrong if any treasure actually surfaces... and, of course, nothing has ever been found.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom