Strange Head Stamp. What is it?

winslow

Sr. Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2004
Messages
436
Reaction score
1,493
Golden Thread
1
Location
Oregon, No Cal Border
🥇 Banner finds
1
Detector(s) used
Garrett AT Pro, Garrett AT Max, Equinox 800

Attachments

  • tomahawk headstamp.webp
    tomahawk headstamp.webp
    151.4 KB · Views: 157
  • tomahawk headstamp  45.webp
    tomahawk headstamp 45.webp
    48.7 KB · Views: 150
  • tomahawk head case vs 45.webp
    tomahawk head case vs 45.webp
    49.8 KB · Views: 141
Maybe im just lost, but no primer on that "casing" maybe not a shell casing at all? maybe a small cap to an old lipstick tube?
 

Upvote 0
Looks to me like a rim fire that has been fired. The head stamp is weird though.
 

Upvote 0
I do know it was fairly common that people would carve stuff into their bullets, not sure about the casings though, its a neat one though. I hope we get an answer on this one
 

Upvote 0
I've never seen a shell with a base like that, it's not a stamp, it just looks like defects in the metal.... Can you get us a diameter in 100ths of an inch? And a length?
 

Upvote 0
Maybe some type of metal match container? They put the texture on the cap so you know which side to pull off when it's dark?
 

Upvote 0
Compared to the .45 ACP, it looks like about a .50 cal. There were a few different .50 cal rimfires that were made around the time of the Civil War, including the celebrated Spencer rifle.

Hard to say what's going on with that surface finish - but I'd say that was done after the cartridge was fired, unless the breech face of the rifle had some sort of pattern that was impressed into the thin brass of the cartridge. I'd say that was unlikely, given the low pressures that these cartridges operated at.
 

Upvote 0
It's a large bore RF casing that was "played" with. It appears to be quite a common thing to do back in that era, when boredom set in around camp. Rimfire calibers up into the .50 caliber size were common in the 1860's...and many of those calibers were loaded for along time after they became considered obsolete because of the quantity of guns out there in working order. 44 Rimfire (think Henry rifle) was loaded all the way into the 1920's by the big manufacturer's...just a point made about dating locations where rimfires are found. That particular casing is too short to be a Spencer, I believe, but definately appears 50 cal. I will try and remember to dig out dimensions of the 2 different Spencer chamberings (both 50 cal, but different length casings if I recall correctly), and some of the other 50 calibers.

I observe here in AZ that I can rely on the casings to pretty accurately date campsites, based on the idea that this region was considered very hostile up into the early 1900's, so people armed themselves with the "latest and greatest." So if i find a bunch of large bore rimfires, I'm confident it dates to 1860's to early 1870's...when centerfire primers became more widespread. Even after "rimfire" died out in bigger calibers, "inside" priming and Benet priming confuses the issue on dates.
I have posted pics before of some unusual casings that were played with...smaller caliber casings pushed/pounded inside larger ones, and have found MANY 1860's era casings here in AZ that are cut into pieces, have holes drilled through, made into little "ornaments", even initials scratched on them.
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0
If a match safe, maybe the head was scuffed up to strike a match on.
 

Upvote 0
Looks roughly like a Spencer 56/56 rimfire case. But I'm at a loss for the markings.

Maybe someone reworked a fired case for a cane-tip or match case?
 

Upvote 0
I've never seen a shell with a base like that, it's not a stamp, it just looks like defects in the metal.... Can you get us a diameter in 100ths of an inch? And a length?

Length is approx 7/8 of an inch. Rim diameter approx .65 of an inch. Base diameter is about .55 of an inch.

Weird thing about the markings is that they are not scratched in but seem to be raised.
 

Upvote 0
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Upvote 0
If the internal diameter at the throat is .55, I think it's not a cartridge at all, unless there is a .55 cal rimfire I've never heard of.... I'm leaning more toward lipstick tube top, which would explain the strange pattern on it.
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0
The indentation on the rim from the firing pin is obvious....and consistent with identical casings I have...time to dig some things out and take pics/measurements for comparison.
 

Upvote 0
Well, I looked and your measurements are pretty much right on for a 56-60 Spencer cartridge, I have no idea what's up with that base though, it just looks like some kind of defect in the metal.... You might send measurements and a pic to this site Headstamp Codes - International Ammunition Association and see if they know anything about it
 

Upvote 0
The first pic is of 2 CONFIRMED 56-50 Spencer's, with J.G. (Joseph Goldmark) headstamps....one was a "drop"(unfired), the other (obviously) fired.These were only made from 1864-66'
2nd pic is the first two Spencers with two unidentified casings....the last one I believe is identical to yours.
3rd pic shows all 4 case heads...BOTh of the unidentified ones have a recessed H...indicating Winchester. You can't see the last one in the pic, but its there.
next 3 pics show overall CASE length of all three different cartridges...the last pic shows the rim diameter, which was consistent with all three cartridges.
What I screwed up was not taking a pic of the case RIM diameter...the Spencer runs .53 unfired, .54 FIRED (completely normal for brass to expand when fired), and the casing that I believe is identical to what you have is .56....the other one had a deformed case mouth, so didn't bother.

I never researched enough to positively ID those two oddballs, and I have a few others (identical) somewhere....so now I guess I have a new obsession.....as well, I have several other largebore rimfires....so it goes to show that at the time of the first metallic cartridges, and with the help of the Civil War, inventors were in a race to come up with "bigger and better."

The Spencer and Henry were the common rimfire REPEATERS....but I would bet there were MANY obscure calibers in single shot rifles at that time.
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0
Some of you right on, others didn't look good. It WAS FIRED in a Spencer gun indicated by the firing pin mark.
 

Upvote 0
SpencerAmmo2_zps6192af17.webp

Could it have been FIRED in a Spencer Carbine?? Possibly...just like you can fire the shorter 38 special in the 357 mag, you could possibly fire this shorter cartridge in the longer chambered Spencer, if dimensionally similar enough. Ballard and Joslyn Carbines also were chambered in Spencer chamberings...and I bet other similar ones.

BUT...I do NOT believe it's a Spencer Cartridge......and if anyone is going by WIKIPEDIA dimensions for the 56-56....I consider them wrong, because the shown .875 case length is too short, this is per a long time collector that will forget more about this stuff than I will ever know, and my own research with this confusing cluster of similar large bore RF's.

This chart reflects ONE specific Spencer chambering....but they are all pretty similar in OAL and case length...because the biggest difference between them involved bullet diameter and case taper.

ETA: Ran across a more diverse list I had of other Spencer dimensions..it show for case length: 56-46: 1.075" 56-52: 1.02" 56-56: .95"

Now to spend some time with my examples that I believe are identical to Winslows.

and if anyone has any data/dimensions concerning these big rimfires....please post it. I would rather be told I'm wrong and find out what they really are than go along labeling my finds incorrectly, or sharing wrong info......I get excited about finding these things like some guys get excited finding coins!
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom