1320
Silver Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2004
- Messages
- 3,436
- Reaction score
- 2,311
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- East Central Kentucky
Paleo: Man and animal co-exist. Animal doesn't fear man. Man occaisonally harvests an animal by hand and can do so at close range with a tool hafted to a stick.
Archaic: Man needs to hunt more animal to sustain himself. Animal starts to wisen up, keeps a little distance from man. Man has to throw his stick for harvest (atl atl).
Woodland: More and more man hunting animal. Animal begins to associate man with death, distances get farther. Man has to reach out even more, puts stick on bow.
Present: Many men hunting animal. Animal associates sight, smell, etc., with man. Man puts tool into a barrel and fires it from great distances.
So, what do you think? Was Paleo man at a technological disadvantage because of his limited thinking ability or did he just get by with what he had to do to make a harvest?
I've been in a few protected Wildlife Management Areas where hunting has been off limits for years....deer will practically eat out of your hand.......
Archaic: Man needs to hunt more animal to sustain himself. Animal starts to wisen up, keeps a little distance from man. Man has to throw his stick for harvest (atl atl).
Woodland: More and more man hunting animal. Animal begins to associate man with death, distances get farther. Man has to reach out even more, puts stick on bow.
Present: Many men hunting animal. Animal associates sight, smell, etc., with man. Man puts tool into a barrel and fires it from great distances.
So, what do you think? Was Paleo man at a technological disadvantage because of his limited thinking ability or did he just get by with what he had to do to make a harvest?
I've been in a few protected Wildlife Management Areas where hunting has been off limits for years....deer will practically eat out of your hand.......
Amazon Forum Fav 👍
Upvote
0