The Questions LRLers Refuse to Answer

[aarthrj3811]

That is the price one pays for ignoring the truth.

What truths have I ignored ?

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Upgraded Night Vision Monocular Digital Infrared Monocular Telescope for 100% Darkness with 8X Zoom - Grab it through Amazon!

[EE THr]

That is the price one pays for ignoring the truth.

What truths have I ignored ?

1st truth you have ignored: You proved that LRLs are the claim, in your own post.

2nd: You, as the claimant, have the burden of showing the proof of your claim.

3rd: The LRL makers claim that anyone can succeed with their LRL, but that's a lie.

4th: If the LRL ads weren't fraudulent, they would pass Carl's test immediately.

5th: You shouldn't make claims that you can't back up.

6th: LRLs don't transmitt a signal that will detect things at Long Range.

7th: There is no receiver in LRLs, so they can't Locate anything better than dowsing rods.

8th: Selling LRLs is a ripoff.

9th: Promoting LRLs is misleading people.

10th: Fake videos don't convince anybody.

11th: Positioning yourself with LRL maker frauds, makes you a part of their fraud.

12th: Accepting gratuities from LRL makers, then promoting their LRLs, makes you an accomplice in their crimes.

13th: Being an accomplice makes you liable in any civil suit against LRL makers, if the plaintiff names you also.

Good luck, you're gonna need it.

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

Ee, why do you keep insisting that aa take a test when you specifically and repeatedly refuse to take one? hmmmm

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI mi canuck buddy sat: you posted -->I also pre-suppose that you can't fly simply by
flapping your arms. How'd I do ? Was I right ?
***********
Nah, but since you use a mechanical device to find your treasures, so I can use a mechanical
device to fly, I can and have for almost 2000 hrs ehhehe

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[EE THr]

Ee, why do you keep insisting that aa take a test when you specifically and repeatedly refuse to take one? hmmmm

Don Jose de La Mancha

The answer to that is very, very, simple. I have made no claims about anything astrological, so I don't need to prove anything astrologically.

 

[aarthrj3811]

Quote from: Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp on Yesterday at 09:13:38 PM
Ee, why do you keep insisting that aa take a test when you specifically and repeatedly refuse to take one? hmmmm

Don Jose de La Mancha

~EEER~

The answer to that is very, very, simple. I have made no claims about anything astrological, so I don't need to prove anything astrologically.

What’s that noise I hear Real Deal.?...Sounds a little like a limb cracking


http://www.astrology.com/
Astrology is a system of divination founded on the notion that the relative positions of celestial bodies are signs of or—more controversially among astrologers—causes of destiny, personality, human affairs, and natural events.[1][2] The primary astrological bodies are the sun, moon, and planets; although astrology is commonly characterized as "reading the stars", the stars actually play a minor role. The main focus is on the placement of the seven planets relative to each other and to the signs of the zodiac, though the system does allow reference to fixed stars, asteroids, comets, and various mathematical points of interest as well. As a craft, astrology is a combination of basic astronomy, numerology, and mysticism. In its modern form, it is a classic example of pseudoscience.

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI EE: A scientific mind is always asking questions, while many of the answers may be of no practical use at the moment, but ? As for astrological psychological profile tests, what do you have to fear? Who knows, perhaps one day it may provide the missing step towards a breakthrough and advancement.

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[EE THr]

In its modern form, it is a classic example of pseudoscience.

artie---

You seem to have a special talent for contradicting yourself in your own posts.

Keep up the good work!






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

HI EE: A scientific mind is always asking questions, while many of the answers may be of no practical use at the moment, but ? As for astrological psychological profile tests, what do you have to fear? Who knows, perhaps one day it may provide the missing step towards a breakthrough and advancement.

Don Jose de La Mancha

RDT---

Once again you have tried to sneak a false premise into your "logic." I have stated why I don't participate in astrology. And you very well know that.

As for "astrological psychological" profiles, this is not mathematics, so two negatives do not make a positive. It just makes it more negative. If you keep trying to push pseudosciences, you will find yourself in the same category as the LRL makers and promoters. And who's fault will that be?

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI EE you posted --> If you keep trying to push pseudosciences, you will find yourself in the same category as the LRL makers and promoters. And who's fault will that be?

****************
This is precisely why I am pushing it, let me prove that while it isn't 100%, it is NOT a pseudoscience. I.e. open and broaden your mind.

You, I trust to give an honest answer.

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[EE THr]

RDT---

All the open mindedness and broadening will still not change conjecture into fact. Only standard Scientific proof will establish something as fact.

If you want to state "maybes," with broadmindedness, that's great; as long as you don't swerve off the path of reality and start trying to use "ifs" as facts. That will take you over the edge and into the abyss of confusion and failure.

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE THr~

That will take you over the edge and into the abyss of confusion and failure.

Gee Real Deal..have you went over the edge of the abyss ? Has EE got you confused and made you a Failure ?...He seems to think that you should bow and respect his logic..and not post any questions that a 5th grader should be able to answer..Art

"The door to Knowledge & Understanding, is never open to a closed, or prejudiced mind”

 

[EE THr]

~EE THr~

That will take you over the edge and into the abyss of confusion and failure.

Gee Real Deal..have you went over the edge of the abyss ? Has EE got you confused and made you a Failure ?...He seems to think that you should bow and respect his logic..and not post any questions that a 5th grader should be able to answer..Art

"The door to Knowledge & Understanding, is never open to a closed, or prejudiced mind”

artie---

Mentioning that a 5th grader should be able to answer questions is not a very shrewd thing to do on this thread, considering the topic title.

You've done yourself in, again, artie!





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

Umm,,,Ahh, Judy, you know that mentioning that aversion to psychology has deeper roots and will cause an immediate attack.

 

[EE THr]

Big J---

Conjecture is simply to venture an unproven idea. All scientific facts began as conjecture.
Science is the only field of human endeavour that operates wholly on objects that are not real in a physical sense, but are negotiated and constructed via social processes in the scientific community. In other words, they are ‘intellectually constructed’. Everything you know as Science was determined by practitioners of a scientific 'discipline' making judgements about arguments within their disciplines. Judgements affected by socioeconomic factors such as political power, scarcity of resources, and so on, but ... in the end ... cognitive events. Thus, by definiton, psychological in nature. It is a discipline with its own unique objects of inquiry that are both the results and the tools of a research process intellectually constructed via social interaction of it's practitioners.
Scientific facts are sociological artifacts.
For someone who displays such an aversion to Psychology, yet relies so heavily on "scientific definitions and methods" to make their case.....that must be extremely uncomfortable and unsettling to know. The very basis of your arguments is founded in a discipline you deny.

What you are inferring is that "Reality" is a figment of imagination. That indicates that yours is. That is entirely your own problem, so don't try to project it onto others.

As for psychology being a real science, I guess you missed the video about that. So here it is, remember to click on to all 10 parts---




I know you see yourself as some kind of amateur psychiatrist, so you probably agree with all things which the videos expose, so it's nothing new to you anyway.

But what you would learn if you really studied Science is The Scientific Method, not whatever you call the BS that you are preaching.

And if you ever do actually get an LRL---



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

Big J---

Since you apparently don't own or use an LRL, it seems that your ad hominem attacks are all you are here for.

That's a consistant #16, in the link below.

Since that is all you seem to do here, it looks like you qualify for the #24, bigtime.

You should get an LRL.

But get that dictionary first.

And, most of all, be sure and see that video, here!





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

Big J---

Although you seem to think that the topic is ad hominem attacks, and how to change the subject, it's actually not.

You can see what the topic actually is, at the top of the page. Don't worry, a little more experience on the Internet, and on forums in general, and maybe you'll get the hang of it.

Just sayin'...

P.S. It would help you stay on topic if you actually had an LRL. Then you could actually say something relevant. (You will need to look that up, when you get your dictionary.)




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

Since someone got desperate and pulled the discussion off topic, I'll put a little reminder here---

The Questions LRLers Refuse to Answer


1. Why don't you take Carl's test?

2. What do you feel is wrong with Carl's test?

3. What do you think is a fair test?


Number one leads to number two, and two leads to three.

They won't, under any circumstances, answer number three; because then they would have to take that test! Because if it were their idea, they can't disagree with it!

When asked #3, they immediately turn to insults or purely nonsensical posts about anything besides the subject at hand. So obvious!


But, here is their big chance, nonetheless....



ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

The inability for LRL promoters to rationally answer these questions is proof that they cannot pass a double-blind test.

And therefore LRLs are a fraud.

The topic question was asked 10 days ago.

Maybe they need to make up some more Science Fiction before they can answer it?





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[Saturna]

Big J---


P.S. It would help you stay on topic if you actually had an LRL.

I don't suspect, for a second, that Judy would do something as silly as spend 1000's of $$$ for a calculator on a box, and then go out in the field waving it around expecting it to find gold.

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

good morming EE: you posted --> P.S. It would help you stay on topic if you actually had an LRL. Then you could actually say something relevant
*************

May I ask which model do you have??

Don Jose de La Mancha