The Strange World of LRLs

Status
Not open for further replies.
aarthrj3811 said:
Gee Carl..We know that you work for White’s..so we have to assume that you are an "Electrical Engineers" even though your web site does not prove that. The rest of the Clown skeptics that have been assigned to this web site it is a mystery ..Are they "Electrical Engineers"?.. Who knows...Art

It's all about the embellishments, Art. Skeptics don't have to make this stuff up, you guys do it for us. At least when Chuckie fabricated his engineering degrees he used a real university, so it seemed slightly believable. But that's a two-edge sword, cause that University happened to have a telephone number.

Dell, are Chuckie and Vernon your role models for "engineers who build LRLs?"
 

Since eveyone is asking questions, I will do it too...

1 - Is a degree in 'electrical or electronics engineering' really required to turn someone more 'knowledgeable' than others who also work in the same
field?

2 - And, assuming the answer above is yes, then why Charlie who... take note, supposedly, has a degree in this field being an employee at whites for
some time now is incapable of helping manufacturing better quality ordinary detectors compared to Minelabs for instance? If his 'knowledge' is
sufficient, then why did they need to infringe Minelab's patents?
 

~Carl~
It's all about the embellishments, Art. Skeptics don't have to make this stuff up, you guys do it for us. At least when Chuckie fabricated his engineering degrees he used a real university, so it seemed slightly believable. But that's a two-edge sword, cause that University happened to have a telephone number.
Gee Carl...I bought two LRL’s from a gentleman who retire from NASA as a Physicist. So are you telling me that he faked his degree and worked for 35 years and no one noticed. I bought another from a gentleman who claims to be a Mathematics’ Professor..so are you now claiming that all LRL manufactures and treasure hunters are fake?...Art
 

Art, things that aren't fraudulent aren't called LRL's.

Regarding your supposed NASA friend etc, your stories in this forum have no credibility, and usually one can't tell (as in this case) what the actual story actually is, regardless of whether it's real or entirely fiction or something in between.

That having been said, LRL's aren't rocket science. Everyone who's spend some time on this forum knows how to design and sell an LRL. I could design one a heck of a lot better than the silly stuff that Dell and Chuckie market, although I admit that when it comes to the marketing I probably couldn't do as well as Chuckie who appears to be well on his way to Twelve Disciples willing to go broke themselves out of loyalty. Lucky for gullibillies that there's still enough distance between my navel and my backbone that the temptation to sell my soul to the devil in order to feed my face isn't there.

Heck, when it comes to better LRL's, I have posted in this very forum ways to make them better, ways that are in principle even patentable without any need for patent fraud like you see in other LRL patents. The means can be disclosed, can be reproduced by others, and represent identifiable improvements in the LRL art of swingy thingy physics and physiological deception. Since I have not been interested in filing on those inventions myself, perhaps Signal or Dell or Chuckie will do so.

How ironic it is that right here in this very forum, I have done more to further the LRL art than all of the LRL manufacturers' apologists put together, and all they know how to do is to complain and deny!

Thus is the curtain pulled, so that those on whom the curtain was pulled can reveal to the world what they are.

--Toto
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom